Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:35:39.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crossed Fingers and Praying Hands: Remarks on Religious Belief and Superstition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. J. Ray
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Extract

Picture the following scene. A minister takes communion to one of her elderly home-bound members. When she arrives she is met by her parishioner and two visiting friends. She invites both visitors to partake of communion with her and the parishioner. One woman happily agrees to do so. The other woman declines by giving a mini-sermon explaining that because she feels unworthy to partake of the Lord's Supper she would be guilty of sin if she did so. Furthermore, if she took communion in this unworthy state God would cause her to be sick. After communion, the minister inquires if she might wash the communion cups. The woman who participated in the sacrament with the pastor and church member asks if she might perform this function. But then she hesitates and asks with a sense of temerity, “Is it alright if I do so?” “I mean,” she continues, “may be I'm not supposed to wash them. They are holy cups and my hands are so tainted with sin. It might be wrong for me to handle them.” Finally, the shut-in who was the original object of the visit in the first place tells her young, and by now bewildered, pastor, “You know. Last month when you brought me communion my hip was killing me. After you served me the elements the pain just went away. I know the sacrament healed me.” The pastor offers a final prayer not knowing if her words will be heard as a prayer to God or as an incantation or spiritual good-luck charm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Phillips, D. Z., Religion Without Explanation (London: Basil Blackwell, 1976), p. 110Google Scholar. Hereafter RWE.

2 Ibid. p. 41.

3 Ibid. p. 110.

4 Phillips, D. Z., Faith and Philosophical Enquiry (New York: Schocken Books, 1970), p. 101.Google Scholar Hereafter FPE.

5 RWE, p. 111.

6 See Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, third edition. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M. (New York: Macmillan, 1958)Google Scholar, Part I, 664. Hereafter PI.

7 Kuitert, H. M., ‘Is belief a condition for understanding?Religious Studies, 17/2 (1981), 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 See PI, 1, 133.

9 See PI, i, 340.

10 RWE, p. 114.

11 FPE, p. 101.

12 Ibid. p. 98.

15 Ferreira, M. Jamie, ‘Universal Criteria and the Autonomy of Religious Belief’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 15/1 (1984), 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Phillips, D. Z., The Concept of Prayer (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965), p. 118.Google Scholar Hereafter CP.

17 CP, p. 119.

18 RWE, p. 110.

19 FPE, p. 107.

20 Ibid. p. 104.

21 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief, ed. by Barrett, Cyril (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), p. 72.Google Scholar Hereafter designated as ‘Lecture’.

22 FPE, p. 104.

24 See ‘Lecture’, pp. 53–64, 70–2.

25 See CP, p. 120.

26 FPE, pp. 102–3.

27 CP, p. 115.

28 RWE, p. 110.

29 Ibid. p. 118.

30 ‘Lecture’, p. 59.

31 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, ‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough’, translated by Miles, A. C. and Rhees, Rush, Human World, No. 3, 1971, 32.Google Scholar

32 Ibid. p. 31.

33 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Culture and Value. Translated by Winch, Peter (London: Basil Blackwell, 1980), p. 83.Google Scholar

34 Ibid. p. 72.

35 ‘Lecture’, p. 57.

36 Ibid. p. 59.

37 Hertzberg, Lars, ‘On the Attitude of Trust’, Inquiry 31:4 (1988), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The original quote is as follows: ‘The contrast between reliance and trust could be summed up as follows. In relying on someone I as it were look down at him from above. I exercise my command of the world. I remain the judge of his actions. In trusting someone I look up from below. I learn from the other what the world is about. I let him be the judge of my actions.’

38 Andrei Koncklovsky, ‘Shy People’, 1987.Google Scholar The dialogue is transcribed from the movie.

39 Phillips, D. Z., Death and Immortality (London: Macmillan, 1970), p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 RWE, p. 110.