Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:14:31.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creation, Creativity and Necessary Being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Martin Hughes
Martin Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Durham, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Can the ontological and cosmological arguments (O and C) for the existence of God, whose complex relationship was discussed by Kant, achieve more together than they can achieve apart? Yes, but what they achieve is not necessarily a proof of monotheism.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 349 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kant, , Critique of Pure Reason A 609, B 637.Google Scholar

2 Hughes, M. ‘Absolute Rotation’, in British journal for Philosophy of Science, XXXII (1982), 359–66.Google Scholar

3 Hick, J. and McGill, A. (ed.), The Many Faced Argument (London, 1968), pp. 4–8.Google Scholar

4 Feuerbach, , Principles of the Philosophy of the Future, cited in Wartofsky, M. W., Feuerbach (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 362–3.Google Scholar

5 Wittgenstein, , Philosophical Investigations 242.Google Scholar

6 Lewis, D. K., Counterfactuals (Oxford, 1973), p. 16.Google Scholar

7 Rescher, N. and Brandom, R., The Logic of Inconsistency (Totewa, 1979), p. 139.Google Scholar

8 Meyer, R. K. and Lambert, K., ‘Universally Free Logic and Standard Quantification Theory’, journal of Symbolic Logic, XXXIII (1968), 8.Google Scholar

9 Hume, , Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part V.99.Google Scholar