Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:17:58.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cosmogonic Myth and ‘Sacred History’1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Mircea Eliade
Affiliation:
Chairman of the History of Religions Field, University of Chicago

Extract

It is not without fear and trembling that a historian of religion approaches the problem of myth. This is not only because of that preliminary embarrassing question: what is intended by myth? It is also because the answers given depend for the most part on the documents selected by the scholar. From Plato and Fontenelle to Schelling and Bultmann, philosophers and theologians have proposed innumerable definitions of myth. But all of these have one thing in common: they are based on the analysis of Greek mythology. Now, for a historian of religions this choice is not a very happy one. It is true that only in Greece did myth inspire and guide epic poetry, tragedy and comedy, as well as the plastic arts; but it is no less true that it is especially in Greek culture that myth was submitted to a long and penetrating analysis, from which it emerged radically ‘de-mythicised’. If in every European language the word ‘myth’ denotes a ‘fiction’, it is because the Greeks proclaimed it to be such twenty-five centuries ago. What is even more serious for an historian of religion: we do not know a single Greek myth within its ritual context. Of course this is not the case with the paleo-Oriental and Asiatic religions; it is especially not the case with the so-called ‘primitive’ religions. As is well known, a living myth is always connected with a cult, inspiring and justifying a religious behaviour. None of this of course means that Greek myth should not figure in an investigation of the mythical phenomenon. But it would seem unwise to begin our kind of inquiry by the study of Greek documents, and even more so to restrict it to such documents. The mythology which informs Homer, Hesiod and the tragic poets represents already a selection and an interpretation of archaic materials, some of which had become almost unintelligible. In short, our best chance of understanding the structure of mythical thought is to study cultures where myth is a ‘living thing’, where it constitutes the very ground of the religious life; in other words, where myth, far from indicating a fiction, is considered to reveal the truth par excellence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 173 note 1 See especially The Myth of the Eternal Return (translated from the French by Willard R. Trask (New York and London, 1954); Myth and Reality (New York and London, 1963).Google Scholar

page 175 note 1 The book has recently been translated into English by Needham, Rodney, Ngaju Religion. The Conception of God among a South Borneo People (The Hague. Martinus Nijhoff, 1963).Google Scholar

page 176 note 1 Schärer, Hans, Ngaju Religion p. 34.Google Scholar

page 176 note 2 Ibid. p. 85.

page 176 note 3 Ibid. p. 87.

page 177 note 1 Schärer, Hans, Ngaju Religion pp. 94 ff.Google Scholar

page 177 note 2 Ibid. p. 97.

page 178 note 1 See particularly Myth and Reality pp. 92 ff.

page 179 note 1 Especially his Aranda Traditions (Melbourne, 1947)Google Scholar and his recent article ‘Personal Monototemism in a Polytotemic Community’ in Festschrift für Ad. E. Jensen (Müchen 1964) pp. 723–54;Google Scholar cf. also ‘La gémellité de I'âme humaine’ in La Tour Saint-Jacques (Paris, 1957) nos. 11–12, pp. 1423.Google Scholar

page 181 note 1 Cf. ‘Personal Monototemism in a Polytotemic Community’ p. 730.

page 181 note 2 Ibid. p. 729. Cf. also Aranda Traditions pp. 36 ff. on the ‘Golden Age’ of the totemic ancestors.

page 182 note 1 See Eliade, M., ‘Australian Religions: An Introduction’ in History of Religions, VI, 19661977.Google Scholar