Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:08:03.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bishop Robinson and Christology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

S.J. Robert Butterworth
S.J. Robert Butterworth
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Christian Doctrine, Heythrop College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘A book’, says Lichtenberg, ‘is a mirror. If an ape looks into it, then obviously what looks back out is not an apostle.’ It may be hoped that these reflections on looking into Dr Robinson's book on Christology will not entirely obscure either the sound points he frequently makes in criticism of traditional Christology, or still less, the good intentions that have led him to write his book. I shall simply be trying to point the way towards how God's human face might possibly be revealed still more clearly in Jesus than it is in Dr Robinson's Christ.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 73 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 73 note 2 Robinson, J. A. T., The Human Face of God, London, SCM Press, 1973.Google Scholar Unless otherwise stated, page–references in the text are to this book.

Page 76 note 1 Cf. e.g., History of Dogma, II, pp. 203, 207 f, 218.Google Scholar

Page 80 note 1 Cf. DrRobinson's, contribution to Christ, Faith and History, edd. Sykes, S. W. and Clayton, J. P., Cambridge, 1972, esp. p. 42.Google Scholar

Page 82 note 1 It is significant that it is a first–rate exegete who has taken a saner (but still very tentative) line in this matter among Roman Catholic theologians—see: Brown, Raymond E., Jesus, God and Man, London-Dublin, Chapman, 1968.Google Scholar

Page 82 note 2 E.g., Hebert, A. G. and Torrance, T. F., as criticised by J. Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Language, O.U.P., 1961, pp. 161–205.Google Scholar

Page 82 note 3 ‘The Faith of the Messiah’, in the Heythrop Journal 10 (1969) pp. 363–70, with substantial biblio–graphy.Google Scholar

Page 82 note 4 ‘Jesus and Faith’, in Studies of the Historical Jesus (Studies in Biblical Theology, 42), London, SCM Press, 1964, pp. 48–64.Google Scholar

Page 82 note 5 ‘Jesus and Faith’, in Word and Faith, London, SCM Press, 1963, pp. 201–46Google Scholar; see also ‘The Question of the Historical Jesus and the Problem of Christology’, Ibid., pp. 288–304. Further: The Nature of Faith, London, Collins–Fontana, 1966.

Page 83 note 1 The Body (Studies in Biblical Theology, 5), London, SCM Press, 1957, p. 63, n. 1.Google Scholar

Page 83 note 2 E.g., Panikkar, R., ‘Faith—a Constitutive Dimension of Man’, in Journal of Ecumenical Studies 8 (1971) PP. 223–54.Google Scholar

Page 85 note 1 Word and Faith, p. 205.Google Scholar