Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:12:58.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Approach to the Emergence of Heterodoxy in Mediaeval Islām

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

John Taylor
John Taylor
Affiliation:
Reader in Islamic Studies, Selly Oak Colleges, Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Self-righteousness and censoriousness are strong emotions. They exist in the claims of ‘orthodoxy’ as much as in the protests of ‘heterodoxy’. They lie behind claims of tolerance as often as behind displays of intolerance. These emotions should be disentangled in the motives of the men who make history, of those who write history, and of those who read history. The very designation ‘heterodox’ is both etymologically and conceptually structured in antithesis to ‘orthodox’. It is a word not only of doctrinal description, but also of inherent condemnation. The structure and the intention of words such as Shī‘a, comprising the whole sweep from bid‘a to ghulūww, direct the attention back to an opposite concept which originates, defines and prejudges these words. One corollary of this is that the movements and doctrines defined as ‘heterodox’ are fundamentally related to the ‘orthodox’ and cannot be understood in isolation. Another is that this relationship, by its very definition in terms of vindication and repudiation, is one of tension.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1967 , pp. 197 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

al-Baghdādī, , Al-Farq bain al-Firaq, tr. Halkin, A. S. (Tel Aviv, 1935).Google Scholar
Bausani, A., Persia Religiosa (Milan, 1959).Google Scholar
Browne, E. G., Literary History of Persia, 4 vols., 1st ed. (Cambridge, 1906–1924).Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., Christianity and History (London. Fontana Ed., 1957).Google Scholar
Corbin, H., Le livre réunissant les deux sagesses, introduction and text of Nasir-e Khosraw, Kitab-e Jami‘ al-Hikmatain (Teheran/Paris, 1953).Google Scholar
Corbin, H., Terre céleste et corps de résurrection (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
Donaldson, D. M., The Shi‘ite Religion (London, 1933).Google Scholar
Farūqī, I. R., ‘On the Ethics of the Brethren of Purity’ in Muslim World, vol. 50, 2–4; 51, 1, 1960–1961.Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R., ‘The Caliphate and the Arab States’ in A History of the Crusades, ed. Setton, and Baldwin, , vol. I (Philadelphia, 1958).Google Scholar
Goldziher, I., Streitschrift des Ghazālī gegen die Bātiniyya-Sekte (Leiden, 1916).Google Scholar
Hodgson, M. G. S., ‘How did the Early Shī‘a become Sectarian,’ in Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 75, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, M. G. S., The Order of Assassins (The Hague, 1955).Google Scholar
Ivanow, W., Brief Survey of the Evolution of Ismailism (Bombay/Leiden, 1952).Google Scholar
Ivanow, W., The Rise of the Fatimids (Oxford, 1942).Google Scholar
Lewis, B., The Origins of Ismā‘ilism (Cambridge, 1940).Google Scholar
Lewis, B., ‘Some Observations on the Significance of Heresy,’ in Studia Islamica, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Ma‘mūr, Prince, Polemics on the Origin of the Fatimi Caliphs (London, 1934).Google Scholar
Massignon, L., ‘L'umma et ses synonymes’ in Revue des Études Islamiques 1941–1946.Google Scholar
al-Narshakhī, , The History of Bukhara, tr. by Frye, R. N. (Cambridge, Mass., 1954).Google Scholar
Nöldeke, T., Sketches from Eastern History, tr. by Black, J. S. (London/Edinburgh, 1892).Google Scholar
O'Leary, de L., A Short History of the Fatimid Khalifate (London, 1923).Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., The Meaning and End of Religion (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
Articles in the Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam (Leiden, 1953), Bātinīya; Imām, Ismā‘īlīya; Ithnā ‘Asharīya; Karmatians; Khurramīya; Sab‘īya; Shī‘a; Takiya.Google Scholar
Article in the Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition (Leiden/London, 1954) Bātiniyya.Google Scholar