Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:33:38.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic Middlemen and the Neutralization of Monopoly Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Sherrill Shaffer
Sherrill Shaffer*
Affiliation:
Banking Studies Department
Get access

Abstract

This paper shows how a monopolist can be induced to produce at the optimal output level and price, by utilizing a strategic middleman to represent to the monopolist a synthetic demand curve such that perceived marginal revenue equals true (inverse) demand. Conditions are derived for insuring the financial viability of such a middleman, and the inability of an unregulated market to enforce these conditions is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 113 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This paper embodies the views of the author and does not represent the views or policy of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The author gratefully acknowledges helpful comments from anonymous referees.

References

REFERENCES

Chiang, A.C. (1974), Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Domar, E.D. (1974), On the Optimal Compensation of a Socialist Manager, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Finsinger, J. and Vogelsang, I. (1981), Alternative Institutional Frameworks for Price Incentive Mechanisms, Kyklos, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 388–404.Google Scholar
Finsinger, J. and Vogelsang, I. (1982), Performance Indices for Public Enterprises, in: Jones, L.P., ed., Public Enterprise in Less Developed Countries, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
Loeb, M. and Magat, W.A. (1979), A Decentralized Method for Utility Regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 399–407.Google Scholar
Mishan, E.J. (1979), Optimality: Where Competition Fails and Monopoly Succeeds, Economics Letters, Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 315–319.Google Scholar
Sappington, D. (1980), Strategic Firm Behavior under a Dynamic Regulatory Adjustment Process, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 360–372.Google Scholar
Tam, M.S. (1981), Reward Structures in a Planned Economy: The Problem of Incentives and Efficient Allocation of Resources, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, I. (1983), Effort Rewarding Incentive Mechanisms for Public Enterprise Managers, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 253–273.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, I. and Finsinger, J. (1979), A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 157–171.Google Scholar