Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T14:26:45.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic Groups : an Application to Foreign and Domestic Firms in Spain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

M.P. Donsimoni  and
V. Leoz-Arguelles
Get access

Extract

The theory of Industrial Organization has traditionally assumed that firms in an industry are alike in all important dimensions except for their market share. In this context, a large body of the literature posits that some long run structural features on an industry such as the size distribution of sellers, the nature of the product and of technology and the existence of barriers to entry generate market power. Above normal profits are the manifestation of this market power and firms are assumed to benefit from it in proportion to their market share.

This theory of industry-wide profit determination has recently been challenged by several authors (Hunt (1972), Newman (1978), Porter (1979), Caves and Pugel (1980), Encaoua and Franck (1980), Encaoua and Jacquemin (1981)). In particular, they have emphasized differences among firms’ strategies within an industry, indicating that these differences appear to be rather stable in the long run. Hence, strategic groups, i.e., groups of firms highly symmetrical in their strategies have been introduced as an additional element of market structure. The resulting hypothesis states that industries with substantial heterogeneous strategic groups should not fit the traditional structure-performance paradigm as well as industries with homogeneous strategic groups. Empirical support for this hypothesis can be found in Newman (1978) and Encaoua and Franck (1980).

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3-4 , September 1981 , pp. 291 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

**

C.R.I.D.E., Université Catholique de Louvain.

*

The authors are particularly grateful to Paul Geroski whose comments induced a drastic rewritting of this paper. Previous criticisms have also improved the actual presentation, they emanated from A. Cardani, R. Caves, D. Encaoua, A. Jacquemin, J.P. Lemaître, T. Pugel, R. Shakotko, E. de Souza, and S. Wellicz. The remaining errors are clearly only the authors’ doing.

References

REFERENCES

Caves, R. and Pugel, T. (1980), Intraindustry Differences in Conduct and Performance: Viable Strategies in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, Monograph 1980–2, New York University, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Caves, R., Porter, H., Spence, M. and Scott, J. (1980), Competition in an Open Economy: a Model Applied to Canada, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J.M. (1969), The Problem of Control in Large American Corporations, The Antitrust Bulletin.Google Scholar
De Vroey, M. (1973), Propriété et pouvoir dans les grandes entreprises, CRISP, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Donsimoni, M.P. and Leoz Arguelles, V. (1980), Profitability and International Linkages in the Spanish Economy, Institut des Sciences Economiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Working Paper n ° 8003. Google Scholar
Encaoua, D. and Franck, D. (1980), Performances sectorielles et groupes de société, Revue Economique, 3.Google Scholar
Encaoua, D. and Jacquemin, A. (1981), Organizational Efficiency and Monopoly Power: the Case of French Industrial Groups, Institut des Sciences Economiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Working Paper n° 8110.Google Scholar
Horst, T. (1972), Firms and Industry Determinants of the Decision to Invest Abroad, Review of Economics and Statistics, 54.Google Scholar
Hunt, H. (1972), Competition in the Major Home Appliance Industry, 1960–1970, unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica en España, 1972–1975, Estadistica Industrial de España, Madrid.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A., De Ghellinck, E. and Huveneers, C. (1980), Concentration and Profitability in a Small Open Economy, Journal of Industrial Economics, 29.Google Scholar
Khalizadeh-Shirazi, J. (1974), Market Structure and Price-Cost Margins in U.K. Manufacturing Industry, Review of Economics and Statistics, 56.Google Scholar
Knickerbocker, F. (1973), Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise, Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Industria (1976), Las Grandes Empresas Industriales Españolas en 1975, Madrid.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Industria (1973, 1974, 1975), La Industria en España in 1972, Madrid.Google Scholar
Newman, H. (1978), Strategic Groups and the Structure-Performance Relationship, Review of Economics and Statistics, 60.Google Scholar
Porter, M. (1979), The Structures within Industries and Companies’ Performance, Review of Economics and Statistics, 61.Google Scholar
Pugel, T. (1978), International Market Linkages and U.S. Manufacturing: Prices, Profits, and Patterns, Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Tabb, W. (1976), Ownership and Control of Large Corporations Revisted, Antitrust Bulletin.Google Scholar