Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:44:36.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Resistible Decline of European Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2015

Get access

Summary

Using a new data set that allows us to analyze precisely the research output in all fields of science, we show that the gap in scientific performance between Europe, especially continental Europe, and Anglo-Saxon countries, especially the USA, is large. We measure research quality by the number of highly cited researchers in nineteen selected scientific fields. After controlling for different variables, such as par capita GDP and outlays in R&D, the differences in productivity between Anglo-Saxon countries and other countries are explained, not surprisingly, by the importance of English proficiency, but also by the quality of institutions and of governance of the countries in the studied sample, the latter being in all likelihood highly correlated with the governance quality of research institutions.

Grâce à une nouvelle base de données qui permet une analyse précise de la production de recherche dans l'ensemble des disciplines scientifiques, nous montrons que l'écart de performance scientifique entre l'Europe, surtout continentale, et le monde anglo-saxon, surtout les USA, est considérable. Nous mesurons la qualité de la recherche par le nombre de chercheurs les plus cités dans chacune des dix-neuf disciplines retenues. Contrôlant pour différentes variables, telles que le PIB par habitant et les dépenses en R&D, les différences de productivité entre les pays anglo-saxons et les autres sont expliquées, sans surprise, par l'importance de la maîtrise de l'anglais, mais aussi par la qualité des institutions et de la gouvernance des pays étudiées, cette dernière étant vraisemblablement fortement corrélée à la qualité de la gouvernance des institutions de recherche.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

CORE and Department of Economics, Université catholique de Louvain. Email: [email protected]

**

Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics, CEPR, and CEP, UK. Email: [email protected]

***

CORE and Department of Economics, Université Catholique de Louvain, and CEPR. Email: [email protected]

The authors thank one referee, Kristian Behrens, Jacques Dreze, Gilles Duranton, Michel Lubrano, Gianmarco Ottaviano, and Matthew Turner for their comments They are also grateful to Rytis Bagdziunas for his assistance in collecting and preparing the data on highly cited researchers. The usual disclaimer applies

References

[1] Aghion, Ph., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A. and Sapir, A. (2007). Why Reform Europe's Universities? Bruegel Policybrief, Issue 2007/04.Google Scholar
[2] Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[3] Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M.M. (1994). The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country and Regional U.S. Data. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 143173.Google Scholar
[4] Bennedsen, M., Malchow-Møller, N. et Vintén, F. (2005). Institutions and Growth - A Literature Survey. Centre for Economic and Business Research, Copenhagen Business School, Report 2005-1.Google Scholar
[5] Brakman, S., Garretsen, H. and Marrewijk, Ch. van (2010) References Across the Fence: Measuring the Dialogue between Economists and Geographers, Journal of Economic Geography 10, 115.Google Scholar
[6] Ciccone, A., and Hall, R. (1996). Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity. American Economic Review 86, 5470.Google Scholar
[7] Farrell, J., and Klemperer, P. (2007) Co-ordination and Lock-in: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects. In Handbook of Industrial Organization (ed. Armstrong, M. and Porter, R.), volume III, pp. 19672072. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
[8] Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2004). The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review 94, 526556.Google Scholar
[9] Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577598.Google Scholar
[10] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. Working Paper No. 3106, World Bank.Google Scholar
[11] Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
[12] Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of Knowledge Flows and their Effects on Innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 308322.Google Scholar
[13] Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2006). Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change. CEPR DP5654.Google Scholar
[14] Prescott, E.C. (1998). Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity. International Economic Review 39, 525551.Google Scholar
[15] Santos Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 641658.Google Scholar
[16] Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2007) Introduction to Econometrics (2d edition). Pearson International Edition.Google Scholar
[17] Trefler, D. (1995). The Case of Missing Trade and Other Mysteries. American Economic Review 85, 10291046.Google Scholar
[18] Tulkens, H. (2007). Ranking Universities: How to Take Better Account of Diversity. CORE Discussion Paper 2007/42.Google Scholar
[19] van Raan, A.F.J. (2005). Challenges in Ranking of Universities. Invited paper for the First International Conference on World Class Universities, Shanghai Jaio Tong University, Shanghai, June 16-18, 2005.Google Scholar
[20] Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar