Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:22:25.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Farrell Measures of Technical Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Get access

Extract

In this paper we consider the problem of evaluating the performance of production units in terms of their technical efficiency. Several attempts have been made to solve this problem and a number of different measures appear in the economic literature : the technical efficiency, here used, is defined to be the ability of a productive organization to operate close to, or on the boundary of its production set; the problem will be analyzed only in terms of physical input and output quantities, without any references to prices or costs structures. This concept of technical efficiency is inspired from the work by Koopmans (1951); it received a first empirical application in Farrel (1957). An interesting survey on this topic may be formed in Førsund, Lovell and Schmidt (1980). Measuring efficiency of this kind for any data set requires first to determine what the boundary of the unknown production set can be; and then, to measure the distance between any observed point and this boundary. In this paper, we concentrate on the Farrel method of estimating technical efficiencies. There the production set is typically a convex polyhedron generated from the observed data with small modifications in view of the assumptions on disposabilities of input and/or on disposibilities of outputs. The distances from the efficient frontier are then measured in a radial sense, i.e. with fixed technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

SMASH, Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Brussel, Belgium and CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Comments of J.J. Gabszewicz and L. Phlips on a previous version are gratefully acknowledged. Discussions on the subject with H. Tulkens and E. Loute were also helpful.

References

REFERENCES

Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, P. (1977), «Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models», Journal of Econometrics, 6, 2137.Google Scholar
Deprins, D. (1983), «Estimation de frontière et mesure d’efficacité: approches descriptive et économétrique», Revue Belge de Statistique, d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, 23, 1, 1962.Google Scholar
Deprins, D., Simar, L. and Tulkens, H. (1983), « Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices» to appear in The Performance of Public Enterprises, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Färe, R. and Lovell, C.A.K. (1978), «Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production», Journal of Economic Theory, 19, 150162.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. (1957), «The Measurement of Productive Efficiency», Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A, general), 120, part 3, 253281.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. and Fieldhouse, M. (1962), « Estimating Efficient Production Functions under Increasing Returns to Scale», Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A, general), 125, part 2, 252267.Google Scholar
Førsund, F.R., Lovell, C.A.K.and Schmidt, P. (1980), «A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of Their Relationships to Efficiency MeasurementJournal of Econometrics, 13, 525.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (1951), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. (1976), «On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions», The Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, 238289.Google Scholar
Shephard, R.W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar