Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:32:31.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monopole télévisuel et publiphobie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Nathalie Sonnac
Nathalie Sonnac*
Affiliation:
Université de Paris II et CREST/LEI
Get access

Résumé

L'analyse contenue dans cet article envisage une chaîne publique et une chaîne privée en monopole comme deux hypothèses alternatives concernant la structure du marché télévisuel. Nous comparons les tarifs et les valeurs publicitaires émergeants de ces hypothèses alternatives en supposant les téléspectatrices ont une aversion pour la publicité. Nous montrons que le tarif, sous l'hypothèse d'un monopole public excède le tarif qu'imposerait un monopole privé quel que soit le niveau des coûts fixes de production de la chaîne.

Summary

Summary

This paper examines the television industry assuming two alternative market structures : private or public monopoly. We compare the advertising tariffs resulting from these two situations under the assumption that TV-watchers are advertising averse. We find that a public firm always selects a higher advertising tariff than the tariff which would be proposed to advertisers by a private monopolist. As a consequence, a shorter period of emission time is devoted to advertising under public ownership of the TV-network.

Keywords

Monopole Télévisuel et PubliphobieD4L82M3TV BroadcastingMonopolyAdvertisingD4L82M3
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , 2002 , pp. 511 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Je remercie les professeurs Jean J. Gabszewicz, Victor Ginsburgh et les membres du CREST/LEI pour leurs remarques et commentaires, ainsi que les rapporteurs anonymes.

References

Références

Boiteux, M. (1949), «La tarification des demandes en pointe», Revue générale d’électricité.Google Scholar
Bonnel, R. (1996), La vingt-cinquième image, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
Brochand, C. (1996), Economie de la télévision, Nathan, Paris.Google Scholar
Brown, T.J. and Rothshild, MX. (1993), «Reassessing the Impact of Television Advertising Clutter», Journal of Consumer Research, June, 20, pp. 138–146.Google Scholar
Calmette, M.F., Cavagnac, M. et Crampes, C. (1994), «La tarification des publications périodiques», Revue d’économie industrielle, 0 (70), pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Danaher, P.J. (1995), “What happens to Television Ratings during Commercial Breaks”, Journal of Advertising Research, January-February, 37, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J.J, Laussel, D. et Sonnac, N. (1999), “TV-Broadcasting Competition and Advertising”, CORE Discussion Paper n°2000/6, Université catholique de Louvain et Lucarnes bleues n°9972 CREST/LEI.Google Scholar
Grilo, I. (1994), “Mixed Duopoly under Vertical Differentiation”, Annales d’économie et de statistiques, 33, pp. 91–112.Google Scholar
Ha, L. (1996), “Advertising Clutter in Consumer Magazines : Dimensions and Effects”, Journal of Advertising Research, July-August, pp.76–84.Google Scholar
IREP (1998), «Les TV avoiders : ils fuient les écrans publicitaires. Qui sontils? Comment les retenir?», Regards croisés sur la consommation des médias, séminaire.Google Scholar
James, W.L. et Arthur, J. (1992), “Do overall Attitudes toward Advertising Affect Involvement with Specific Advertisements?”, Journal of advertising research, September-October, pp. 78–83.Google Scholar
Kent, R.J. (1993), “Competitive Versus non Competitive Clutter in Television Advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research, March-April, pp. 40–46.Google Scholar
Owen, B.M. and Wildman, S.S. (1985), “Program Competition, Diversity and Multichanel Bundling in the New Video Industry”, in Eli, N. Noam, (ed.) Video Media Competition : Regulation, Economics and Technology, Columbia University Press, New-York, pp. 244–273.Google Scholar
Owen, B.M. and Wildman, S.S. (1992), Video Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).Google Scholar
Peltier, S. (1999), Commerce international et protection : le cas des programmes télévisuels, Thèse de doctorat es sciences économiques, Université de Paris I, non publiée.Google Scholar
Ray, M.L. and Webb, PH. (1986), “Three Prescriptions for Clutter”, Journal of Advertising Research, February-March, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. (1997), “Does Clutter degrade the Media Environment?”, Esomar, pp. 201–212.Google Scholar
Sonnac, N. (2000), “Readers’ Attitudes toward Press Advertising : are they Ad-Lovers or Ad-Averse?”, Journal of Media Economics, n° 13 (4), pp. 249–259.Google Scholar