Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:41:15.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modifications de comportement précédant la défaillance d’entreprise: l’impact des cessions d’actifs sur la relation de crédit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Régis Blazy
Régis Blazy*
Affiliation:
CERPEM, Université Paris Dauphine, France
Get access

Résumé

Le processus de défaillance d’une entreprise, lorsqu’il résulte d’une dégradation de ses performances économiques, est affecté par les règles de partage qui prendront place en cas de liquidation. Il existe notamment, en cas de dégradation continue des résultats, des incitations conduisant l’entreprise à réduire son potentiel de croissance, par cession prématurée des actifs, afin de préserver la confiance de ses partenaires. Ce type de comportement, en retardant le défaut de paiement, risque d’accroître l’insuffisance d’actif et, par voie de conséquence, réduire le taux de recouvrement des créances. Néanmoins, en cas de difficultés temporaires, la politique de cession prématurée des actifs peut constituer un outil stratégique efficace contre le refus de prèt. Les résultats d’une enquète menée auprès du Tribunal de Commerce de Paris entre 1993 et 1995 (données de 1991) confirment l’existence de telles cessions d’actifs : en retardant le déclenchement de la procédure collective, elles constituent un obstacle au redressement des entreprises.

Summary

Summary

Priority rules, prevailing under liquidation, affect the corporate bankruptcy process, especially when this process is due to a decrease of economic performances. In case of lasting difficulties, there are incentives for the firm to liquidate its own assets in order to preserve creditors’ confidence. This modification of behaviour, which postpones financial distress, may deepen the gap between liabilities and assets, and reduce the recovery rate. Nevertheless, in case of temporary difficulties, this strategy may avoid credit rationing. Results from a survey conducted between 1993 and 1995 (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris, 1991 data), confirm the existence of such liquidations of assets. By postponing the initiation of bankruptcy, they are impediments to firms’ reorganization.

Keywords

G33D82D21G33D82D21
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , 1999 , pp. 225 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

Je tiens à remercier pour leurs commentaires et leurs conseils Monsieur le Professeur Pierre-Marie Larnac, Madame le Professeur Jacqueline Pradel, Monsieur Jérôme Combier ainsi que les deux rapporteurs anonyrnes de la revue. Mes remerciements s’adressent également, pour son précieux soutien, à la Fondation Jean Bastin de la Namur - Assurances du Crédit. Je tiens enfin à exprimer ma reconnaissance envers Monsieur Jean-Louis Duplat, Président de la Commission Bancaire et Financière, et Messieurs les Professeurs Hubert Ooghe et Charles P. Van Wyrneersch. Je demeure seul responsable des erreurs ou omissions qui pourraient subsister.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Aghion, P. et Bolton, P. [1992], An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting, Review of Economic Studies, 59, pp. 473–494.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.W. et Sundaresan, S. [1996], Design and valuation of debt contracts, Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), pp. 37–68.Google Scholar
Ang, J.S., Chua, J.H. et McConnel, J.J. [1982], The administrative costs of corporate bankruptcy : A note, Journal of Finance, 37(1), pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
Baird, D.G. [1986], The uneasy case for corporate reorganizations, Journal of legal studies, 15, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
Bergman, Y.Z. et Callen, J.L. [1991], Opportunistic underinvestment in debt renegotiation and capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 29, pp. 137–171.Google Scholar
Black, F. et Scholes, M. [1973], The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 637–654.Google Scholar
Blazy, R., Charlety, P. et Combier, J. [1993], Les défaillances d’entreprises: des difficultés visibles plusieurs années à l’avance, Economie et Statistique, n° 268–269, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
Blazy, R. et Combier, J. [1997], La défaillance d’entreprise: causes économiques, traitement judiciaire et impact financier, coll. I.N.S.E.E. Méthodes, n° 72–73, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. et Schwartz, E. [1978], Corporate income taxes, valuation, and the problem of optimal capital structure, Journal of Business, 51, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
Campbell, T.S. et Marino, A.M. [1994], Myopic investment decisions and competitive labor markets, International Economic Review, 35(4), pp. 855–875.Google Scholar
Chen, A.H. [1979], A theory of corporate bankruptcy and optimal capital structure, in Bickler, J.L. [éd.], Handbook of Financial Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 275–291.Google Scholar
De Meza, D. et Webb, D.C. [1987], Too much investment : A problem of asymétrie information, Quarterly Journal of Economics, mai, pp. 281–292.Google Scholar
Delabruyère, D. et Pailler, P. [1994], Les procédures de redressement et de liquidation judiciaires de 1990 à 1992, Infostat Justice, n° 39.Google Scholar
Delaney, K.J. [1992], Strategic bankruptcy : How corporations and creditors use chapter 11 to their advantage, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dharan, B.G. [1992], Auditing as a signal in small business lending, Journal of Small Business Finance, 2(1), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Drukarczyk, J. [1991], Secured debt, bankruptcy, and the creditors bargain model, International Review of Law and Economics, 11, pp. 203–221.Google Scholar
Fourgeaud, C., Gourieroux, C. et Pradel, J. [1989], Sélection de clientèle et tarification de prêt bancaire, Cahiers de mathématiques de la décision n° 9009, Paris, Ceremade - Université Paris Dauphine.Google Scholar
Franks, J.R. et Nyborg, K.G. [1992], Workouts versus formal bankruptcy : Incentives and inefficiencies under different Bankruptcy Codes, Working Paper, mars, London Business School.Google Scholar
Franks, J.R. et Torous, W.N. [1991], How firms fare in workouts and chapter 11 Reorganization, Working Paper, London Business School and UCLA.Google Scholar
Gertner, R. et Scharfstein, D. [1991], A theory of workouts and the effects of Reorganization Law, Journal of Finance, 46(4), pp. 1189–1222.Google Scholar
Giammarlno, R.M. [1989], The resolution of financial distress, Review of Financial Studies, 2(1), pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Harris, M. et Raviv, A. [1991], The theory of optimal capital structure, Journal of Finance, 46(1), pp. 299–355.Google Scholar
Hart, O. [1993], Theories of optimal capital structure: A managerial discretion perspective, in Blair, M.M. (éd.), The Deal Decade - What Takeovers and Leveraged Buyouts Mean for Corporate Governance, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution, pp. 19–53.Google Scholar
Hart, O. et Moore, J. [1994], A theory of debt based on the inalienability of human capital, Quarterly Journal of Economics, novembre, pp. 841–379.Google Scholar
Hart, O. et Moore, J. [1997], Default andrenegotiation : a dynamic model of debt, Working Paper n ° 5907, N.B.E.R. Google Scholar
Haugen, R.A. et Senbet, L.W. [1978], The insignificance of bankruptcy costs to the theory of optimal capital structure, Journal of Finance, 33(2), pp. 383–393.Google Scholar
Haugen, R.A. et Senbet, L.W. [1988], Bankruptcy and agency coste: Their significance to the theory of optimal capital structure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(1), pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.C. et Meckling, W.H [1976], Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305–360.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Ramaswamy, K. et Sundaresan, S. [1993], Does default risk in coupons affect the valuation of corporate bonds ? : A contingent claims Model, Financial Management, automne, pp. 117–131.Google Scholar
Korobkin, D.R. [1991], Rehabilitating values : A jurisprudence of bankruptcy, Columbia Law Review, 91(4), pp. 717–789.Google Scholar
Leland, H.E. [1994], Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure, Journal of Finance, 49(4), pp. 1213–1252.Google Scholar
Leland, H.E. et Toft, K.B. [1996], Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads, Journal of Finance, 51(3), pp. 987–1019.Google Scholar
Mella-Barral, P. et Perraudin, W. [1997], Strategic debt service, Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp. 531–556.Google Scholar
Merton, R.C. [1973], A rational theory of option pricing, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, pp. 141–183.Google Scholar
Merton, R.C. [1974], On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates, Journal of Finance, 29, pp. 449–469.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. et Miller, M.H. [1958], The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment, American Economic Review, 48(3), pp. 261–297.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. et Miller, M.H. [1963], Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital : A correction, American Economic Review, 53(3), juin, pp. 433—443.Google Scholar
Ngend-Ngend, S. [1987], Un outil de sélection des crédits-clients : l’analyse en composantes principales, Economies et Sociétés, n° 12, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar
Ooghe, H. et Van Wymeersch, C.P. [1996], Traité d’analyse financière, tomes 1 et 2, 6e édition, Namur, Presses Universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
Petersen, M.A. et Rajan, R.G. [1994], The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships, Working Paper n° 4921, N.B.E.R. Google Scholar
Saint-Alary-Houin, C. [1995], Droit des entreprises en difficulté, Paris, Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Saporta, G. [1990], Probabilités, analyse des données et statistique, Paris, Technip.Google Scholar
Scott, J. [1976], A theory of optimal capital structure, Bell Journal of Economics, 7, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
Stein, J.C. [1989], Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms : A Model of myopie corporate behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics, novembre, pp. 655–669.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. et Weiss, A. [1981], Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information, American Economic Review, 71(3), pp. 393–410.Google Scholar
Webb, D.C. [1987], The importance of incomplete information in explaining the existence of costly bankruptcy, Economica, 54), pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
White, M. [1983], Bankruptcy costs and the new Bankruptcy Code, Journal of Finance, 38(2), pp. 477–487.Google Scholar