No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Market Index Specification and Estimation of Risk on the Brussels Stock Exchange
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2016
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that the level of autocorrelation in the market index returns of the Brussels Stock Exchange depends on the number of securities which make up the index as well as their price adjustment delay. It also shows that the value of the systematic risk depends on both the choice of an index and the length of the differencing interval used to calculate the returns. Furthermore it highlights the fact that autocorrelation coefficients and systematic risk coefficients also exhibit seasonal fluctuations.
Cet article démontre que le degré d’autocorrelation dans les rendements des indices de marché de la Bourse de Bruxelles dépend du nombre de titres qui interviennent dans le calcul de ces indices ainsi que du délai d’ajustement du prix de ces titres à toute nouvelle information. Il examine également la relation entre la valeur du risque systématique, le choix d’un indice de marché et la longueur de l’intervalle utilisé pour calculer les rendements. De plus, les résultats obtenus révèlent l’existence de fluctuations saisonnières dans les coefficients d’autocorrelation et la valeur des coefficients betas.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1992 , pp. 85 - 107
- Copyright
- Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1992
References
REFERENCES
Atchison, M.D., Butler, K.C. and Simonds, R.R. (1987), Nonsynchronous Security Trading and Market Index Autocorrelation, Journal of Finance, 42, pp. 111–118.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M.S. (1946), On the Theoretical Specification of sampling Properties of Autocorrelated Time series, Journal of Royal Statistical Society , Ser.B8, 27.Google Scholar
Bertonèche, M. (1978), European Security Markets: Efficiency, International Diversification and Prospects, doctoral thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A..Google Scholar
Cohen, K.J., Hawawini, G.A., Maier, S.F., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K. (1980), Implications of Microstructure Theory for Empirical Research on Stock Price Behavior, Journal of Finance, 35, pp. 249–257.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.J., Hawawini, G.A., Maier, S.F., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K. (1983), Estimating and Adjusting for the Intervalling Effect Bias in Beta, Management Science, 29, pp. 135–148.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.J., Hawawini, G.A., Maier, S.F., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K (1983), Friction in the Trading Process and the Estimation of Systematic Risk, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, pp. 263–278.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.J., Maier, S.F., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K. (1979), On the Existence of serial Correlation in an Efficient Securities Market, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 11, pp. 151—168.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.J., Maier, S.F., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K. (1986), The Microstructure of Securities Market , New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Corhay, A. (1989) Essays in Financial Economics: Return Seasonalities and Systematic Risk Estimation on the Brussels Stock Exchange, Option pricing Models, doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Corhay, A. (1990), Daily Anomalies in the Brussels Equity Markets, Research paper n° 9001, CREDEL, Liège.Google Scholar
Dimson, E. (1979), Risk Measurement when Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, pp. 197–226.Google Scholar
Engle, R. (1982), Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK inflation, Econometrica 50, pp.987–1008.Google Scholar
Fama, E.F. (1965), The Behavior of Stock Market Prices, Journal of Business, 38, pp. 34–105.Google Scholar
Fowler, D.J. and Rorke, C.H.(1983), Risk Measurement when Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading : Comment, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, pp. 279–283.Google Scholar
Hawawini, G.A. (1980), Intertemporal Cross-dependence in Securities Daily Returns and the Short-Run Intervalling Effect on Systematic Risk, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15, pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
Levhari, D. and Levy, H. (1977), The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Investment Horizon, Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar
Perry, P.R. (1985) Portfolio Serial Correlation and Nonsynchronous Trading, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20, pp. 517–523.Google Scholar
Pogue, G.A. and Solnik, B.H.(1974), The Market Model Applied to European Common Stocks: Some Empirical Results, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9, pp. 917–944.Google Scholar
Roden, PF. (1985), Beta Sensitivity to Specification of the Market Index, Review of Business and Economic Research, 20/2, pp.101–110.Google Scholar
Roll, R. (1981), A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect, Journal of Finance, 36, pp. 879–888.Google Scholar
Saniga, E.M., Mcinish, T.H. and Gouldey, B.K. (1981), The Effect of Differencing Interval Length on Beta, Journal of Financial Research, 4, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar
Scholes, M. and Williams, J.(1977), Estimating Betas from Non Synchronous Data, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, pp. 309–328.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K. (1977), Evidence on the Presence and Causes of Serial Correlation in Market Model Residuals, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12, pp. 291–313.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New-York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Solnik, B. (1973), Note on the Validity of the Random Walk for European Stock Prices, Journal of Finance, 28, pp. 1151–ß1159.Google Scholar