Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:38:04.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Les implications macroéconomiques extérieures d’une monnaie unique en Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Gérard Kébabdjian*
Affiliation:
Université de Paris 8
Get access

Résumé

L’article analyse la coopération monétaire en Europe comme une coalition (au sens de la théorie des jeux) au sein de l’économie mondiale. Le modèle de Canzoneri et Henderson sert de point de départ; il est enrichi, notamment par la prise en compte d’une fonction de création de la monnaie internationale, pour répondre à trois questions: La coordination des politiques monétaires européennes contribuera-t-elle à améliorer l’équilibre mondial, spécialement du point de vue de l’emploi? Quelles implications associer au refus d’accorder à l’objectif d’emploi une place explicite dans la formulation de la politique monétaire européenne conformément au traité de Maastricht? Quelles implications associer à la promotion de l’euro comme une monnaie internationale concurrente du dollar?

Summary

Summary

This article analyses European monetary co-operation as a coalition—in its game theory meaning—in the context of the world economy. Starting with the Canzoneri and Henderson model, we add equations, particulary an international liquidity creation function, so as to adress the following questions. Can European monetary policy cooperation improve world equilibrium, particulary as far as employment is concerned? What will be the consequences of the absence of employment targets in European policy, as formulated in Maastricht treaty? What will be the implications of the promotion of an international currency in competition with the dollar?

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

Je dois remercier les deux rapporteurs anonymes, et plus particulièrement l’un des deux, pour la lecture attentive de la première version et les remarques qui m’ont permis d’améliorer grandement le contenu de cet article. Je reste bien sûr seul responsable des erreurs et imperfections qui peuvent encore demeurer.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Alesina, A. et Grilli, V. [1992], The European Central Bank: reshaping monetary politics in Europe, in Canzoneri, B.M., Grilli, V. et Masson, P. (éds), Establishing a Central Bank : Issues in Europe and Lessons from the US, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp.4977.Google Scholar
Barro, R. et Gordon, D. [1983], Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), pp.101122.Google Scholar
Benassy, A., Italianer, A. et Pisani-Ferry, J. [1993], Les implications extérieures de la monnaie unique, Economie et Statistiques, n° 262–263, pp.4962.Google Scholar
Canzoneri, B. et Henderson, D. [1988], Is sovereign policymaking bad?, in Brunner, K. et Meltzer, A.H. (éds), Stabilization Policies and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy n° 28, pp 93140.Google Scholar
Canzoneri, B. et Henderson, D. [1991], Monetary Policy in Interdependant Economies, Cambridge (Mass), The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. [1969], Macroeconomic policy adjustment in interdependent economics, Quaterly Journal of Economics, 83(1), pp. 124 Google Scholar
Currie, D., Holtham, G. et Hughes-Hallett, A. [1989], The theory and practice of policy coordination: does coordination pay?, in Bryant, R.C et al. (éds), Macroeconomic Policies in an Interdependent World, Brookings Institution, CEPR et FMI, pp. 1446.Google Scholar
Dolado, J., Griffiths, M. et Padilla, J. [1994], Delegation in international monetary policy games, European Economic Review, 38(5), pp. 10571069.Google Scholar
Emerson, M. et al [1991], Marché unique, Monnaie unique, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A.R. et Masson, P.R. [1991], Model uncertainty, learning, and the gains from coordination. The American Review, 81(3), pp.465479.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. [1993], The external dimension of EMU, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 59(1–2), pp.6580.Google Scholar
Hamada, K. [1976], A strategic analysis on monetary interdependence, Journal of Political Economy, 84(4), pp.677700.Google Scholar
Kenen, P.B. [1993], EMU, exchange rates and international monetary system, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 59(1–2), pp.257281.Google Scholar
Laskar, D. [1991], Une union monétaire européenne pourrait-elle être moins inflationniste qu’une zone mark? Un argument, Annales d’économie et de statistique, n° 24, pp. 155180.Google Scholar
Martin, P. [1994], Monetary policy and country size, Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(5), pp.573586.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R.I. [1963], Optimum currency areas, The American Economic Review, 53(4), pp.717725.Google Scholar
Miller, M. et Salmon, M. [1985], Policy coordination and dynamic games, in Buitter, W.H. et Marston, R.C. (éds), International Economic Coordination, NBER, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M. et Salmon, M. [1990], When does coordination pay?, Journal of Dynamics and Control, 14(1–2), pp.553570.Google Scholar
Mundell, R.A. [1961], A theory of optimum currency areas, The American Economic Review, 51(4), pp.657665.Google Scholar
Niehans, J. [1968], Monetary and fiscal policies in open economies under fixes exchange rates: An optimizing approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76(4), pp.893943.Google Scholar
Oudiz, G. et Sachs, J. [1985], International policy coordination in dynamic macroeconomic models, in Buitter, W.H. et Marston, R.C. (éds), International Economic Coordination, NBER, Cambridge University Press, pp.274319.Google Scholar
Rogoff, K. [1985a], Can international monetary policy coordination be counterproductive?, Journal of International Economics, 18(3/4), pp. 199217.Google Scholar
Rogoff, K. [1985b], The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target, The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 100(4), pp. 11691189.Google Scholar
Sterdyniak, H. et Villa, P. [1993], Régimes de Change et coordination des politiques économiques en Europe, Observations et Diagnostics économiques, n° 44, pp.307348.Google Scholar