Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:26:41.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le problème de la coordination dans la controverse Hayek-Keynes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Abdallah Zouache
Abdallah Zouache*
Affiliation:
CREUSET, Université de Saint-Étienne
Get access

Résumé

Notre analyse de la coordination inter-individuelle dans la controverse Hayek-Keynes nous permet de distinguer deux types de problème de coordination. Le problème de coordination au sens de Hayek est temporaire. II est la conséquence de chocs informationnels exogènes perturbant les interactions entre les individus. II implique un concept de chômage temporaire. Le problème de coordination au sens de Keynes est permanent. II est le résultat endogène des interactions entre les individus évoluant au sein de marchés interdépendants. II conduit au concept de chômage involontaire au sens de Keynes.

Summary

Summary

Our analysis of inter-individual coordination in the Hayek-Keynes controversy allows us to distinguish two coordination problems. First, Hayek's coordination problem is a temporary one. It is the result of exogenous informational shocks perturbing the interactions between individuals. It leads to the concept of temporary unemployment. Second, Keynes's coordination problem is a persistent one. It results from endogenous interactions between individuals evolving in interdependant markets. It leads to Keynes's concept of involuntary unemployment.

Keywords

HayekKeynescoordinationB22E12E32HayekKeynescoordinationB22E12E32
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , 2003 , pp. 459 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

L'auteur remercie Michel Belief et trois rapporteurs pour leurs remarques qui ont permis d'améliorer la version finale de l'article. L'auteur reste seul responsable des incompréhensions et erreurs.

**

Université de Saint-Étienne, 6, rue Basse des Rives, 42023 Saint-Étienne. Tél: 04-77-42-19-61. Fax: 04-77-42-19-50. Email: [email protected]

References

Références

Butos, W. (1985), “Hayek and general equilibrium analysis”, Southern Economie Journal, vol.52, n°2, pp.332–343.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (éd.) (1995), Contra Keynes and Cambridge, the collected works of F. A. Hayek, vol.9, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (1998), “Why didn't Hayek review Keynes's general theory”, History of Political Economy, vol.30, n°4, pp.545–569.Google Scholar
Clower, R. (1989), “Keynes' general theory: the Marshall connection”, in Walker, D. (éd.), Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, Aldershot, Edward Elgar, vol. 2, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Cochran, J. et Glahe, F. (1994), “The Keynes-Hayek debate : lessons for contemporary business cycle theorists”, History of Political Economy, vol.26, n°1, pp.69–94.Google Scholar
Colonna, M. (1990), “Hayek on money and equilibrium”, Contributions to Political Economy, vol.9, pp.43–68.Google Scholar
De Vroey, M. (1999a), “Keynes and the Marshall-Walras divide”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol.21, n°2, pp.117–136.Google Scholar
De Vroey, M. (1999b), “The marshallian market and the walrasian economy, two incompatible bedfellows”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol.46, n°3, pp.319–338.Google Scholar
Dos Santos Ferreira, R. (1999), « Keynes et le développement de la théorie de l'emploi dans une économie monétaire », Working Paper n° 9905, BETA, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Dostaler, G. (1991), “The debate between Hayek and Keynes”, in Barber, W.J. (éd.), Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, Aldershot, Edward Elgar, vol.6, pp.77–101.Google Scholar
Dostaler, G. (1999), « Hayek, Keynes et l'économie orthodoxe », Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.109, n°6, pp.762–773.Google Scholar
Foss, N. (1994), “The intertemporal coordination of economic activities : the early debate between Hayek and Keynes”, in Foss, N., The austrian school and modern economics, Copenhagen, Handelshojskolensforlag, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1928), “Intertemporal price equilibrium and movements in the value of money”, in McCloughry, R. (éd.), Money, capital and fluctuations, early essays of F.A. Hayek, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984, pp. 71–117.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1931a), “A rejoinder to Mr. Keynes”, Economica, vol.11, November, pp.398–403.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1931b), « Correspondance avec J.M. Keynes », in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol.13, pp.257–259.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1931c), Prices and production, London, Routledge and Sons, édition 1935. Traduction française, Paris, Calmann-Levy, 1975.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1931d), “Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J.M. Keynes”, Economica, vol.11, August, pp.270–295.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1932a), « Correspondance avec J.M. Keynes », in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol.13, pp.260–264.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1932b), “Money and capital: a reply”, The Economic Journal, June, vol.42, n°166, pp.237–249.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1932c), “Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J.M. Keynes (continued)”, Economica, vol.12, February, pp.22–44.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1933a), Monetary theory and the trade cycle, New-York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1966.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1933b), “Price expectations, monetary disturbances and malin-vestment”, in Profits, interest and investment, Clifton, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1937), “Economics and knowledge”, in Hayek, F., Individualism and economic order, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1948, pp.33–56.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1939), Profits, interest and investment, Clifton, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1945), “The use of knowledge in society”, The American Economic Review, vol.35, n°4, pp.519–30. Trad, française, Revue Française d'Économie, 1986, vol.5, n°2, pp.117–140.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1966), “Personal recollections of Keynes and the ‘keynesian revolution’”, The Oriental Economist, vol.34, n°663, pp.78–80; in Caldwell, B. (éd.), The collected works of F.A. Hayek, contra Keynes and cam-bridge, London, Routledge, 1995, vol.9, pp.240–246.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1978), “Competition as a discovery procedure”, in New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas, London and Henley, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1983), “The Keynes centenary : the austrian critique”, The Economist, June 11, pp. 45–48; in Caldwell, B. (éd.), The collected works of F.A. Hayek, contra Keynes and Cambridge, London, Routledge, 1995, vol. 9, pp. 247–255.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1988), The fatal conceit, the errors of socialism, London and New York, Routledge. Traduction française, La présomption fatale, les erreurs du socialisme, 1993, Libre Échange, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1967), “The Hayek story”, in Critical essays in monetary theory, Oxford, Clarebdon Press, pp.203–215.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1982), “Introductory : LSE and the Robbins circle”, in Collected essays in monetary theory, vol. 2, money, interest and wages, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, pp.3–10.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1930), A treatise on money, 2 vols., in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol. 5–6.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1931a), « Correspondance avec F. Hayek », in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol.13, pp.257–260.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1931b), “The pure theory of money, a reply to Dr. Hayek”, Economica, voi.11, November, pp.385–397.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1932a), « Correspondance avec F. Hayek », in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol.13, pp.262–266.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1932b), « Lettre à J. Robinson », in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol. 13, pp. 269–270.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1934), “Poverty in plenty : is the economic system self-adjusting”, The Listener, in The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, London, Macmillan, 1973, vol.13, pp.485–492.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936), Théorie générale de l'emploi, de l'intérêt et de la monnaie, édition 1969, Paris, Bibliothèque Scientifique Payot.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1937), “The general theory of employment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.51, pp.209–223. Traduction française, Revue Française d'Economie, 1990, vol.5, n°4, pp. 141–156.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1973), The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, Moggridge, D. (éd.), London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kresge, S. (éd.) (1999), Good money: the new World, The collected works of F.A. Hayek, vol.5, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L.M. (1986), “Austrian economics under fire:the Hayek-Sraffa duel in retrospect”, in Grassi, W. et Smith, B. (éds.), Austrian economics, historical and philosophical background, New-York, New-York University Press, pp.225–242.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M.S. et Horn, B.L. (1992), “Notes on the Sraffa-Hayek exchange”, Review of Political Economy, vol.4, n°3, pp.314–340.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. (1981), Information and coordination, New-York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. (1998), “Comment : involuntary unemployment one more time”, in Backhouse, R. et al. (éds.), Economics and methodology, crossing boundaries, London, Macmillan Press, pp.225–236.Google Scholar
McCloughry, R. (éd.) (1984), Money, capital and fluctuations, early essays of F.A. Hayek, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mongiovi, G. (1990), “Keynes, Hayek and Sraffa : on the origins of chapter 17 of the general theory”, Économie Appliquée, vol.43, n°2, pp.131–156.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, G.P. (1977), “Spontaneous order and the coordination of economic activities”, Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol.1, n°2, pp.137–151.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. (1997), “The principle of effective demand”, in Harcourt, G. et Riach, P. (éds.), A ‘second edition’ of the general theory, London, Routledge, vol.1, pp.93–107.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1933), “A parable on savings and investment”, Economica, vol.13, February, pp.75–84.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. (1967), The years of high theory : invention and tradition in economic thought 1926–1939, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1932), “Dr. Hayek on money and capital”, Economic Journal, vol.42, n°165, pp.42–53. Traduction Française par Leonard, J. et Maurisson, P., Cahiers d'Économie Politique, 1984, n°9, pp.5–17.Google Scholar
Steele, G.R. (1993), “Philosophical perceptions and the precepts of political economy. Friedrich Hayek and John Maynard Keynes”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol.40, n°1, pp.89–103.Google Scholar
Tieben, B. (1994), “Misunderstandings and other coordination failures in the Hayek-Keynes controversy”, in Keizer, W. et al. (éds.), Austrian economics in debate, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1997), “An overview of the general theory”, in Harcourt, G. et Riach, P. (éds.), A ‘second edition’ of the general theory, London, Routledge, vol.2, pp.3–28.Google Scholar