Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T18:40:50.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Selling Immigration Rights Politically Sustainable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2015

Bertrand Crettez
Get access

Summary

This paper relies on Benhabib (1996)’s immigration model to analyze the political sustainability of selling immigration permits, an idea proposed by Gary Becker. To simplify the analysis, we focus on the effects of immigration flows on input prices. We find that immigration quotas almost always generate the highest capital-labor ratio (and thus the highest wage rate). We also provide an example in which immigration permits generate the lowest value of the capital-labor ratio when permits sales are wasted. Under this last assumption, we show that if the wealth of the median voter is low enough, immigration quotas will be chosen over immigration permits. If the median voter's wealth is high, then the issue of majority voting will be the system which delivers the lowest capital-labor ratio.

Cet article utilise le modèle d'immigration de Benhabib (1996) pour savoir si la vente de permis d'immigrer, une idée due à Gary Becjer, est politiquement possible. Pour simplifier l'analyse, nous nous ne prenons en considération que les effets de flux migratoires sur les prix des facteurs de production. Nous montrons que les quotas d'immigration engendrent presque toujours le plus haut ratio capital-travail (et donc la plus haute valeur des salaires). Nous proposons également un exemple où, sous l'hypothèse que le revenu de la vente des permis n'est pas réinvesti, la vente de permis d'immigrer permet de réaliser la plus petite valeur du ratio capital-travail.

Sous cette hypothèse, si la richesse de l'électeur médian est assez faible, le résultat des élections sera tel que les quotas d'immigration seront toujours préférés à la vente de permis d'immigrer. Si la richesse de l'électeur médian est au contraire plutôt élevée, alors le système qui sera choisi par une majorité d'électeurs est celui qui permet de réaliser le plus bas niveau de stock de capital par tête.

Keywords

Immigration quotasimmigration permitsrights to immigratequotas d'immigrationpermis d'immigrerdroits à immigrerF22J18F22J18
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 33 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris II, Laboratoire d'Économie du Droit, ERMES EAC 4441 CNRS, 26 rue des Fossés Saint-Jacques, 75005, Paris. Phone: (33) 01 44 41 89 61 Email: [email protected].

I am grateful to Susan Crettez and Jean-Pierre Vidal for very helpful comments on a previous version of this work. I also thank two anonymous referees for stimulating remarks.

References

Atsu Amegashie, J. (2004),. “A Political Economy Model of Immigration Quotas”, Economics of Governance, Vol. 5, Nov, 255–267.Google Scholar
Becker, G. and Becker, N. (1997). “Why Not Let Immigrants Pay for Speedy Entry”, pages 58–59, in The economics of Life.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary, (2005). “Sell the Right to Immigrate”, The Becker-Posner Blog, February 21.Google Scholar
Bellettini, G. and Ceroni, C. Berti (2008). “Can Unions Hurt Workers: A positive Analysis of Immigration Policy”, Economics and Politics, Vol. 20 (1), 106–124.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J. (1996). “On the Political Economy of Immigration”, European Economic Review, 40, 1737–1743.Google Scholar
Bilal, S., Grether, J.M. and de Melo, J. (2003), “Attitudes Towards Immigration: A Trade Theoretic Approach”, Review of International Economics, 11, 1, 253–267.Google Scholar
Boeri, T., Hanson, G. and McCormick, B. (2002). Immigration Policy and the Welfare System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borjas, (2003). “The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, (4), 1335–1374.Google Scholar
Borjas, (2009). “The Analytics of the Wage Effect of Immigration”, Working paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. (1964). The Meaning of the Twentieth Century, Harper and Row, New-York.Google Scholar
Card, D. (2005). “Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?”, Economic Journal, 115, (4), F300–F-323.Google Scholar
De la Croix, D. and Gosseries, A. (2007). “Procreation, Migration and Tradable Quotas”, in Population Aging, Intergenerational Transfers and the Macroeconomy, 227–249, R. Clark, A. Mason and N. Ogawa eds, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
De la Croix, D. and Gosseries, A. (2009). “Population Policy Through Tradable Procreation Entitlements”, International Economic Review, Vol. 50, 2, 507–542.Google Scholar
Docquier, F. and Marfouk, A. (2006). “International migration by education attainment”, in International migration, remittances and the brain drain, Ozden, Caglar and Schiff, Maurice Editors, Palgrave Macmillan: New York (2006) (available at: http://perso.uclouvain.be/frederic.docquier/oxlight.htm).Google Scholar
Dula, G., Kahana, N. and Lecker, T. (2006). “How to partly bounce back the struggle against illegal immigration to the source countries”, Journal of Population Economics, 933–1433.Google Scholar
Dustmann, C. and Breton, I. (2007). “Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration”, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Vol 7, 1 (Advances), article 62.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. S. and Nitzan, S. (2006). “The Struggle Over Migration Policy”, Journal of Population Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Facchini, G., Razin, A. and Willmann, G. (2004). “Welfare Leakage and Immigration Policy”, Cesifo Economic Studies, 50 (4), 627–645.Google Scholar
Facchini, G. and Willmann, G. (2005). “The Political Economy of International Factor mobility”, Journal of International Economics, 67, 201–219.Google Scholar
Felbermayr, G.J. (2003). “On the possibility of Sustainable Immigration Policy in a Democratic Society”, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X. (2009). “Power Laws in Economics and Finance”, Annual Review of Economics, 1, p. 255–93. (Available at: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/%7Exgabaix/).Google Scholar
Grether, J.M., de Melo, J. and Muller, T. (2001). “The Political Economy of Migration in a Ricardo-Viner Model”, in Djajic, S., ed., International Migration: Trends, Policy, and Impact, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Lundborg, P. and Segerstrom, P. S. (2002). “The Growth and Welfare Effects of International Mass Immigrations”, Journal of International Economics, 56, 177–204.Google Scholar
Magris, F. and Russo, G. (2004). “Voting on Mass Immigration Restriction”, Working Paper 2004-27, Delta.Google Scholar
Mayda, A. M. (2006). “Who is Against Immigration ? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes Toward Immigrants”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 510–530.Google Scholar
Ochel, W. (2001). “Selective Immigration Policies: Point System versus Auction Model”. CESifo Forum 2 (2), 48–52.Google Scholar
Ortega, F. (2005). “Immigration Quotas and Skill Upgrading”, Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1841–1863.Google Scholar
Ottaviano, G. and Peri, G. (2005). “Rethinking the Gains from Immigration: Theory and Evidence from the U.S”, N.B.E.R Working Paper 11672, October.Google Scholar