Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:37:31.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Behaviour, the Technology of Demand, and the Pattern of International Trade between Identical Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

B. Lyons
B. Lyons*
Affiliation:
St Johns College, Cambridge
Get access

Extract

The aim of this paper is to clarify three issues relating to the empirical investigation of prices and import penetration when marginal costs are not increasing. The first is to demonstrate explicitly the simultaneous determination of industrial prices and import penetration. Second, to examine how oligopoly and/or product differentiation may lead to international trade between identical countries. Third, to emphasise the importance of the technology of demand when trying to explain price and trade. The technology of production is often mentioned in this context, yet the technology of demand, by which is meant the characterisation of the tastes of consumers, is usually ignored but is shown to be of some importance.

In order to simplify the discussion it is assumed that all firms in all countries have access to identical technologies and factor costs. Unlike in the usual textbook models, marginal costs are assumed to be nonincreasing. Furthermore, the consumption patterns in each country are taken to be identical. There is, however, one difference between selling on the home market, and selling abroad — there are trading costs. These may result from transport costs, tariffs, social, linguistic and legal factors, or anything else, but they are assumed to apply with equal magnitude to each country. These assumptions permit a clearer analysis of the effects of oligopoly and product differentiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3-4 , September 1981 , pp. 243 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, G.C. (1961), Chamberlin Versus Chicago, Review of Economic Studies 24.Google Scholar
Archibald, G.C. and Rosenbluth, G. (1975), The “new” Theory of Consumer Demand and Monopolistic Competition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89.Google Scholar
De ROSA, D.A. and Goldstein, M. (1981), Import Discipline in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector, I.M.F. Staff Papers, 28.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Norman, V. (1980), Theory of International Trade, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R.G. (1978), Freedom of Entry and the Existence of Pure Profit, The Economic Journal, 88.Google Scholar
Isard, P. (1977), How far can we push the “law of one price”?, American Economic Review, 67.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1980), Scale Economies, Product Differentiation and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review, 70.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K.J. (1980), Intra-Industry Trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition, Journal of International Economics, 10.Google Scholar
Lyons, B.R. (1981), International Trade in Spatially Differentiated Products, mimeo.Google Scholar
Lyons, B.R. (1982), Oligopoly and International Trade, in Markets and Firms: Essays in Honour of Basil Yamey, edited by Tucker, K.A. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Stern, Francis and Schumacher, (1976), Price Elasticities in International Trade, Macmillan.Google Scholar