Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T15:17:47.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit tax co-ordination under repeated policy interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Marco Catenaro  and
Jean-Pierre Vidal
Marco Catenaro
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
Jean-Pierre Vidal
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
Get access

Summary

In the context of a stylised game theoretical framework of capital tax competition, we show that when repeated policy interactions are associated to a systematic punishment of the deviating policymaker, a co-ordinated outcome can be the solution to the non co-operative tax game. This result suggests that explicit forms of policy co-ordination, such as a centralised tax authority, could in fact be largely unnecessary.

Résumé

Résumé

Dans le cadre d'un modèle de concurrence fiscale, nous montrons qu'une coordination implicite des taux de taxation peut résulter des interactions répétées entre les autorités fiscales, lorsque l'autorité qui déciderait de poursuivre une stratégie non coopérative pendant une période est systématiquement punie par la suite. Ce résultat suggère que des formes explicites de coordination, comme l'instauration d'une autorité fiscale centralisée, pourraient bien être inutiles.

Keywords

Coordination de politiquematières fiscales internationalesE61H87policy co-ordinationinternational fiscal issuesE61H87
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , 2006 , pp. 5 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors are grateful to Bertrand Crettez, Luca Onorante, Pierre Pestieau, Ludger Schuknecht, Rolf Strauch, Emmanuelle Taugourdeau, Juergen von Hagen, an anonymous referee of the ECB Working Paper Series and three anonymous referees of this review for comments and constructive criticism. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 5th Banca d'ltalia Workshop on Public Finance (Perugia, 3-5 April 2003). Comments from Vieri Ceriani, David Heald, Michael Keen, Ranjana Madhusudhan and other workshop participants are also gratefully acknowledged. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank. [email protected][email protected]

References

Barro, R. and Gordon, D. (1983), “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, pp. 101–122.Google Scholar
Bucovetsky, S. (1991), “Asymmetric Tax Competition”, Journal of Urban Economics, 30, pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (1993), “Property Tax Competition in a repeated game”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
Cardarelli, R., Taugourdeau, E. and Vidal, J-P. (2002), “A Repeated Interaction Model of Tax Competition”, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. and Keen, M. (1996), “Tax Competition and Leviathan”, European Economic Review, 40, pp. 113–13.Google Scholar
Fourçans, A. and Warin, T. (2002), “Tax Harmonization in Europe : Do the Member States Give the Right Signal”, mimeo.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. (1971), “A Noncooperative Equilibrium for Supergames”, Review of Economic Studies, 38, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Krogstrup, S. (2003), “Are Capital Taxes Racing to the Bottom in the European Union”, HEI Working Paper No. 01/2003.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.G. (1992) “Repeated Games : cooperation and rationality”, in Advances in Economic Theory Sixth World Congress, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razin, A. and Sadka, E. (1994), “International fiscal policy coordination and competition”, in Handbook of International Macroeconomics, van der Ploeg, F. (Ed.), Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taugourdeau, E. (2002), “Is fiscal cooperation always sustainable when regions differ in size? Lessons for the EMU”, Cahiers de la MSE, no. 2002.27, University of Paris I.Google Scholar
Wildasin, D.E. (1988), “Nash Equilibria in Models of Fiscal Competition”, Journal of Public Economics, 35(2), pp. 229–240.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1991), “Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, pp. 423–451.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1999), “Theories of Tax Competition”, National Tax Journal, 52(2), pp. 269–304.Google Scholar
Zodrow, G. R. and Mieszkowski, P. (1986), “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods”, Journal of Urban Economics, 19, pp. 356–370.Google Scholar