Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:46:26.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Big shock, slow growth and the dynamics of aggregate labour demand with firing costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Marianne Chambin  and
Franck Portier
Marianne Chambin
Affiliation:
MAD-Paris I
Franck Portier
Affiliation:
CEPREMAP-MAD-University of Rouen
Get access

Summary

This paper studies the dynamic properties of the labour demand model with non convex adjustment costs proposed by Bentolila and Bertola [1990]. With this model we evaluate the importance of the firing costs, following a great shock, for the dynamics of adjustment of the aggregated labour demand of a stationary state to an other. The model is calibrated on the French economy, and studies the transition following the shock of 1973-74,–i.e. a shock on the price of oil as well as the transition from a rapid and stable growth to a slow and uncertain one. We show that in this case, a drastic reduction of the firing costs when the shock occurs does not allow to modify substantially the path of the economy.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article étudie les propriétés dynamiques du modèle de demande de travail avec coûts d’ajustement non convexes proposé par Bentolila et Bertola [1990]. Nous évaluons avec ce modèle l’imortance des coûts de licenciement dans la dynamique d’ajustement de la demande de travail agrégée d’un état stationnaire à un autre, suite à un grand choc. Le modèle est étalonné sur l’économie française, et étudie la transition à la suite du choc de 1973-74, –i.e. un choc sur le prix du pétrole ainsi que le passage d’une croissance rapide et peu variable à une croissance lente et incertaine. Nous montrons que dans ce cas, une réduction drastique des coûts de licenciement au moment du choc ne permet pas de modifier sensiblement la trajectoire de l’économie.

Keywords

J23E27J23E27
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 62 , Issue 3-4 , 1996 , pp. 357 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

We thank without implications Jean-François Jacques, the participants at the CEPREMAP-Universitad Carlos III de Madrid-Université Catholique de Louvain SPES workshop, the MAD Université de Paris I workshop, the 1993 MAD international workshop on “Labor Market Dynamics and Aggregate Fluctuations” and three anonymous referees.

References

Bentolila, S, and Bertola, G. [1990], Firing costs and labour demand: How bad is eurosclerosis?, Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), pp. 381–402.Google Scholar
Bentolila, S, and Saint-Paul, G. [1992], A model of labour demand with linear adjustment costs, Working paper 92–05, DELTA.Google Scholar
Bentolila, S. [1987], The labor demand side of European unemployment: The role of adjustment costs, Mimeo, Massachusets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bertola, G. and Caballero, R. [1990], Kinked adjustment costs and aggregate dynamics, in Blanchar, O.J. and Fischer, S. (eds), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press,Google Scholar
Burda, M. [1987], Monopolistic competition, costs of adjustment and the behavior of European unemployment, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. and Engel, E. [1991], Dynamic (S, s) economics, Econometrica, 59(6), pp. 1659–1686.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. and Engel, E. [1993], Heterogeneity and output fluctuations in a dynamic menu-cost economy, Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), pp. 95–119.Google Scholar
Caplin, A. and Spulber, D. [1987], Menu costs and the neutrality of money, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(4), pp 703–725.Google Scholar
Caplin, A. [1985], The variability of aggregate demand with (S, s) inventory policies, Econometrica, 53(6), pp 1395–1409.Google Scholar
Chambin, M. and Portier, F. [1993], Aggregate labor demand dynamics with kinked hiring and firing costs, Working paper, Macroéconomic et Analyse des Déséquilibres, Université de Paris I, 1993.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. [1991], A simplified treatment of the theory of optimal regulation of brownian motion, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15(4), pp. 657–73.Google Scholar
Emerson, M. [1988], Regulation or deregulation of the labour market, European Economic Review, 32(4), pp. 775–817.Google Scholar
Hamermesh, D.S. [1989], Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs, American Economic Review, 79(4), pp. 674–689.Google Scholar
Leban, R. and Lesourne, J., [1980], The firm’s investment and employment policy through a business cycle, European Economic Review, 13(1), pp. 43–80.Google Scholar
Nickell, S.J. [1978], Fixed costs, employment, and labour demand over the cycle, Economica, 45(180), pp. 329–345.Google Scholar
Nickell, S.J. [1986], Dynamic models of labour demand, in Ashenfelter, O. and Layard, R. (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Scarf, H. [1960], The optimality of (S, s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem, in Arrow, K. Karlin, S. and Suppes, P. (eds), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Los Angeles, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheshinski, E. and Weiss, Y. [1977], Inflation and costs of price adjustment, Review of Economic Studies, 44(2), pp. 287–303.Google Scholar