Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:25:05.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aspects stratégiques d'une politique environnementale incitative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Get access

Résumé

Nous analysons une politique environnementale menée de façon unilatérale par un Pays Développé, destinée à lutter contre une pollution globale. Dans un cadre de concurrence internationale, nous étudions les conséquences d'une telle politique sur la répartition géographique des activités de production, sur les émissions globales, et sur la recherche de technologie propre de la part des firmes. Nous montrons principalement que des considérations stratégiques amènent les gouvernements à des politiques laxistes. Ce résultat de dumping écologique est robuste au type de concurrence puisque nous l'obtenons aussi bien pour une concurrence en prix que pour une concurrence en quantités.

Summary

Summary

We analyze an environmental policy initiated unilaterally by an industrial country which objective is to reduce a global pollution. In an international trade framework, we study the effects of such a policy on the geographical distribution of production, on the global level of emissions, and on the clean technology research by the firms. We mainly show that strategical considerations lead governments to laxist policies. This ecological dumping result is robust to the kind of competition since it can be obtained in a price competition as well as in a quantity competition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Je remercie les participants aux 3ièmes Journées du GREEN-CIRANO (Québec), au Séminaire de Microéconomie (Université de Montréal), au Séminaire du CATT (Université de Pau), ainsi que les rapporteurs anonymes de cet article pour leurs commentaires. Je reste responsable pour toute erreur ou omission.

**

Université de Toulouse (LEERNA-IDEI), Manufacture des Tabacs, bât. F, 21 allée de Brienne, 31042 Toulouse Cedex, France. Tél.: 05 61 12 86 32. Fax: 05 61 12 86 37. Courriel: [email protected].

References

Bibliographie

Barrett, S. (1994), “Strategic environmental policy and international trade”, Journal of Public Economics, 54, pp.325338.Google Scholar
Bouët, A. (2001), “Tariffs, voluntary export restraints and research and development”, European Economic Review, 45(2), pp.323336, February.Google Scholar
Bouët, A. (1999), « O.M.C, et accords de prix : quelques enseignements d'un modèle oligopolistique avec recherche et développement », Globalisation et politiques économiques: les marges de manœuvre, Bouët, A. et Le Cacheux, J. (éds), Economica, Paris.Google Scholar
Brander, J.A. and Spencer, B.J. (1985), “Export subsidies and market share rivalry”, Journal of International Economics, 18, pp.83100.Google Scholar
Bulow, J.I., Geanakoplos, J.D. and Klemperer, P.D. (1985), “Multimarket oligopoly : strategic substitutes and complements, Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp.488511.Google Scholar
Cavendish, W. and Anderson, D. (1994), “Efficiency and substitution in pollution abatement, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, pp.774799.Google Scholar
Conrad, K. (1995), “Choosing emission taxes under international price com-petition”, Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Carraro, C, Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.8598.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. (1984), “International trade policy for oligopolistic industries”, Economic Journal Conference Papers, 94, pp.116.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. and Grossman, G.M. (1986), “Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly”, Quaterly Journal of Economics, 101, pp.383406.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. and Krugman, P.R. (1992), Trade policy and market structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hiriart, Y. (2002), “Global pollution control : moral hazard and adverse selection in international trade context”, miméo, Université de Toulouse.Google Scholar
Rauscher, M. (1992), «Intégration économique internationale et environnement : le cas de l’Europe », dans Commerce mondial et environnement, Anderson, K. et Blackhurst, R. (éds), Economica, Paris.Google Scholar
Rauscher, M. (1994), “On ecological dumping”, Oxford Economie Papers, 46, pp.822840.Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1975), “Re-examination of the perfeetness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games”, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, pp.2555.Google Scholar
Spencer, B.J. and Brander, J.A. (1983), “International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy”, Review of Economie Studies, 50, pp.707722.Google Scholar
Tiróle, J. (1988), Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. (1994), “Environmental policy and international trade – A survey of recent economic analysis”, Nota di lavoro 53.94, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. (1995), “Strategie environmental policy and international trade: the role of market conduct”, Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Carraro, C, Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.99130.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1995), “Trade, strategic innovation and strategic environmental policy – A general analysis”, Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Carraro, C, Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 181208.Google Scholar
Vives, X. (1999), Oligopoly Pricing, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar