Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:38:49.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Value of Living: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Charles Blackorby
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
David Donaldson
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. (1984), Social Criteria for Evaluating Population, Journal of Public Economies, 25, pp. 1333.Google Scholar
Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. (1991), Pigs and Guinea Pigs: A Note on the Ethics of Animal Exploitation, Discussion Paper N° 91–30, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1992), The Value of Living, in this issue.Google Scholar
Narveson, J. (1967), Utilitarianism and New Generations, Mind, 76,1, pp. 6272.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1982), Future Generation: Further Problems, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11, pp. 113172.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1991), Welfare Economics and Population Ethics, paper prepared for the Nobel Jubilee Symposium on “Population, Development, and Welfare” at Lund University, 5–7, December 1991.Google Scholar