Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:37:35.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Markets to Control Pollution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Théodore C. Bergstrom*
Affiliation:
(Washington University, St. Louis)
Get access

Extract

The primary purpose of this paper is to study the extent to which prices and markets can be employed as means towards efficient control of pollution. The model which is examined is, however, sufficiently general to apply to any sort of externalities among producers and consumers, including classical public goods. In the first section we consider the problem of efficient means of achieving a specified standard of environmental quality. We then briefly discuss the more difficult problem of choosing the environmental quality standards themselves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is based on research undertaken while the author was a visitor at CORE in Louvain, Belgium. The research was carried out whithin the project “Analyse économique de la lutte contre la pollution des eaux”, under contract between the Université Catholique de Louvain and the Belgium Ministry of Scientific Policy; the latter project is itself part of the “Premier programme national de Recherche et de développement sur l'environnement physique et biologique”, administered by Service de la Politique et de la Programmation Scientifiques. The notion of an isomorphism between an exchange economy and an economy with fixed levels aggregate externalities was first suggested to me by Professor Henry Tulkens of CORE who drew a very clever Edgeworth box. For this and many other stimulating conversations, I am most grateful to Professor Tulkens and his colleagues at CORE

References

Arrow, K.,(1970), “The Organization of Economic Activity,” in Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis, Haveman, R. and Margolis, J., eds. Markham, Chicago Google Scholar
Arrow, K. and Hahn, F.,(1971) General Competitive Analysis, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T.,(1970) Collective Choice and the Lindhal Allocation Method, mimeographed, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T., (1973a) Equilibrium in a Finite Economy with Bounded Non-Convexity, mimeographed, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T.,(1973b), Regulation of Externalities, mimeographed, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Coase, R.,(1960), “The problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law & Economics, October, 1960.10.1086/466560Google Scholar
Debreu, G.,(1956), “Market Equilibrium,”‘ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 42, 876878.10.1073/pnas.42.11.876Google Scholar
Debreu, G.,(1962), “New Concepts and Techniques for Equilibrium Analysis,” International Economic Review, 3, 257273.10.2307/2525394Google Scholar
Denzau, A.,(1974) Majority Voting and Competitive Equilibrium, Ph. D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Freeman, A., Haveman, R. and Kneese, A., The Economics of Evironmental Policy, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kohn, R., (1971) “Optimal Air Quality Standards,” Econometrica, 39, 983996.10.2307/1909671Google Scholar
Lindahl, E., (1964) “Just Taxation - A Positive Solution,” English translation, in Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, ed. by. Musgrave, R. and Peacock, A., St. Martin's Press, New York, 168196.Google Scholar
Newman, P., (1965) The Theory of Exchange, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Google Scholar
Quirk, J., and Saposnik, R., (1968) Introduction to General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Rader, T.,(1964) “Edgeworth Exchange and General Economic Equilibrium,” Yale Economic Essays, 4, 133180.Google Scholar
Ruff, L., (1970) “The Economic Common Sense of Pollution,” The Public Interest, 19, 6985.Google Scholar
Ruff, L.,(1972) “A note on Pollution Prices in a general Equilibrium Model,” American Economic Review, 62, 186192.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.,(1954) “The Pure Theory of Public ExpendituresReview of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387389.10.2307/1925895Google Scholar
Starrett, D.,(1972) “Fundamental Nonconvexities in the Theory of Externalities,” Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 180199.10.1016/0022-0531(72)90148-2Google Scholar