Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:23:55.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The theory of labour supply and commodity demand with an endogenous marginal wage rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Alan A. Powell
Alan A. Powell*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Extract

The seventies have seen a burgeoning of an empirical literature on labour-leisure choice grounded in the work on the systems approach to the estimation of demand systems which flowered in the sixties. Working with the Klein-Rubin utility function, Betancourt (1973) extended Lluch’s ELES system (1970, 1973) to include the labour-leisure choice. Abbott and Ashenfelter (1976) analysed United States data on hours worked using both the Klein-Rubin and the indirect addilog utility functions (although, unlike Betancourt, they did not endogenize savings). Kiefer (1977) used a Bayesian approach to the estimation of a 7 commodity plus leisure system which imposed only classical restrictions on a Rotterdam model written in logarithmic differentials. He also explored the use of a quadratic indirect utility function as a second order Taylor approximation to an arbitrary nested indirect utility function in which Box/Cox transformations comprise the inner nests (Kiefer, 1975). Phlips (1978) has used an extended Klein-Rubin utility function, in which the real stock of money appears, to integrate the demand for commodities and leisure with the demand for money. Barnett (1979) has imbedded the commodity and leisure demand problem into a version of the Rotterdam model under relatively weak assumptions about preferences. Finally, recent empirical work using Betancourt’s TELES model on Australian data has been reported by Tulpulé (1978).

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 215 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to my colleagues Ashok Tulpulé and Richard J. Filmer who worked with me on the paper which begat the current paper. Richard Filmer also drew my attention to some relevant literature which I had overlooked. I benefitted from the opportunities to present that earlier paper to a workshop at C.O.R.E., Louvain, in October 1978, and to present a draft of the current paper to the Institute of Labour Studies at the Flinders University of South Australia in September 1979. I am especially indebted to Peter B. Dixon, who checked the mathematics underlying the major results of the paper, and as well offered helpful comments. Tony Lawson and Ken Clements kindly gave detailed comments on the manuscript. The research was supported, in part, by the IMPACT Project. All errors are the exclusive responsibility of the author.

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, M., and Ashenfelter, O. (1976), « Labour Supply Commodity Demand and the Allocation of Time », Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 43 (3), No. 135.Google Scholar
Barnett, W.A. (1979), « The Joint Allocation of Leisure and Goods Expenditure », Econometrica. Vol. 47, No. 3.Google Scholar
Barten, A.P. (1964), « Consumer Demand Functions Under Conditions of Almost Additive Preferences », Econometrica, Vol. 32, No. 1–2.Google Scholar
Betancourt, R.R. (1973), « Household Behaviour in a Less Developed Country : An Econometric Analysis of Cross Section Data », Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (mimeo).Google Scholar
Burtless, G. and Hausmann, J.A. (1978), « The Effect of Taxation on Labour Supply : Evaluating the Gary Negative Income Tax Experiment », Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 6.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A.S. (1967), « Functional Form and Utility : A Review of Consumer Demand Theory », University of Wisconsin, Social Systems Research Institute, Systems Formulation, Methodology and Policy Workshop Paper 6703 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1939), Value and Capital, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiefer, N.M. (1975), « Quadratic Utility Labour Supply and Commodity Demand », Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, Princeton N.J. (mimeo).Google Scholar
Kiefer, N.M. (1977), « A Bayesian Analysis of Commodity Demand and Labor Supply », International Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 1.Google Scholar
Lluch, C. (1970), « The Extended Linear Expenditure System », University of Essex, Department of Economics, Discussion Paper. No. 11 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Lluch, C. (1973), « The Extended Linear Expenditure System », European Economic Review, Vol. 4, No. 1.Google Scholar
Lluch, C., Powell, A.A. and Williams, R.A. (1977), Patterns in Household Demand and Saving, New York, Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
Phlips, L. (1978), « The Demand for Leisure and Money », Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 5.Google Scholar
Powell, A.A. (1974), Empirical Analytics of Demand Systems, Lexington, Mass., D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Powell, A.A.. Tulpulé, A. and Filmer, R.J. (1977), « Commodity Specific Subsidies, Demand Patterns and the Incentive to Work », IMPACT Project Preliminary Working Paper. No. BP-10, Industries Assistance Commission, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (mimeo).Google Scholar
Theil, H. (1971), Principles of Econometrics, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tulpulé, A. (1979), « Empirical Estimation of Labour Supply Elasticities ». IMPACT Project Preliminary Working Paper. No. BP-12, Industries Assistance Commission, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (mimeo).Google Scholar
Woodland, A.D. and Wales, T.J. (1979), « Labour Supply and Progressive Taxes », Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 46 (1), No. 142.Google Scholar