Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:38:56.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards user/system collaboration in developing a student model for intelligent computer assisted language learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2011

Susan Bull
Susan Bull
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines research in the field of collaborative learning, concentrating on aspects suitable for use in an intelligent computer assisted language learning (ICALL) system. Current work on the project focuses on the construction of a student model, based on the notion that a model constructed and repaired through collaboration between the system and student will lead to a more accurate representation of the learner's beliefs, and is less likely to be regarded with suspicion by the student. Further, the act of collaboration should promote reflection on both the language to be learnt and the student's approaches to learning.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , May 1993 , pp. 3 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bierman, D, Breuker, J and Sandberg, J (eds), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Education, IOS, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar
Bouwhuis, D G (ed), Cognitive Modelling and Interactive Environments, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
Bowerman, C, CALL Systems. LICE: An Intelligent Tutoring System to Assist Writing in German, ReCall, No 3, 1990, pp 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, S A, Collaborative, Inspectable Student Model for Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning, PhD Thesis Proposal, Departmental Discussion Paper, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, 1992.Google Scholar
Caplan, N, Choy, M H and Whitmore, J K, Indochinese Refugee Families and Academic Achievement, Scientific American, Vol 266 No 2, 1992, pp 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T-W, Chan and Baskin, A B, “Studying with the Prince” - the Computer as a Learning Companion, Proceedings ITS, Montreal, Canada, 1988, pp 194–200.Google Scholar
Chanier, T and Pengelly, M, Knowledge Acquisition for Learner Modelling in Second Language Learning, in Bouwhuis, (ed), University of Lancaster: AI Group Technical Report no. 51, 1991.Google Scholar
Chi, M T H, Bassok, M, Lewis, M W, Reimann, P and Glaser, RSelf-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems, Cognitive Science, Vol 13, 1989, pp 145–182.Google Scholar
Collins, A and Brown, J S, The Computer as a Tool for Learning Through Reflection, in Mandl, and Lesgold, (eds), 1988, pp 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A, Brown, J S and Newman, S E, Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, in Resnick, (ed), 1989, pp 453–494.Google Scholar
Cumming, G and Self, J, Collaborative Intelligent Educational Systems, in Bierman, Breuker and Sandberg, (eds), 1989, pp 73–80.Google Scholar
Cumming, G and Self, J, Learner Modeling in Collaborative Intelligent Educational Systems, in Goodyear, (ed), 1991, pp 85–104.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P and Self, J, Designing Human-Computer Collaborative Learning, University of Lancaster: AI Group Technical Report no. 47, 1990.Google Scholar
Goodyear, P (ed), Teaching Knowledge and Intelligent Tutoring, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1991.Google Scholar
Mandl, H and Lesgold, A (eds), Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J M and Chamot, A U, Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, L B (ed), Knowing, Learning and Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.Google Scholar
Ridgway, J, Of Course ICAI is Impossible… Worse though, it might be Seditious, in Self, (ed), 1988c, pp 28–48.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J and Barnard, Y, Interviews on AI and Education: Allan Collins and Stellan Ohlsson, AI Communications, Vol 4 No 4, 1991, pp 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, A H (ed), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987a.Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, A H, What's All the Fuss About Metacognition? in Schoenfeld, (ed), 1987b, pp 189–215.Google Scholar
Self, J A, By passing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling, Proceedings ITS, Montreal, Canada, 1988a pp 18–24.Google Scholar
Self, J (ed), Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning, Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction, Chapman and Hall, London, 1988b.Google Scholar
Todd, R R, Self-Organized Learning within an Intelligent Teaching System, in Self, (ed), 1988c, pp 197–211.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L S, Mind in Society, The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.Google Scholar
Wenger, E, Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems, Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann Inc., CA, 1987.Google Scholar