Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:37:40.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The language learner and the software designer

A marriage of true minds or ne'er the twain shall meet?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Susan Myles  and
Graham Davies
Susan Myles
Affiliation:
Middlesex University
Graham Davies
Affiliation:
Thames Valley University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When Susan presented this paper at EUROCALL 97 she was extremely ill. As Susan's PhD supervisor, I knew only too well what she was going through when she mounted the rostrum and nervously organised her notes, but I could not have imagined that in two short months her life would come to an end. Such was Susan's courage in her struggle against cancer that she gave few outward indications of her suffering and only looked to the future, continuing to teach, to research and to give her attention to her home and family.

My last conversation with Susan centred on this paper and the trials she was about to conduct with her students in the new academic year. The paper is published here with the minimum of editing. It stands as a tribute to Susan's research but represents only a short summary of the vast amount of data that she had collected so meticulously, and it only hints at the interesting findings that were beginning to emerge. It is likely, however, that the mass of notes that Susan has left behind will yield further results.

Susan is greatly missed by her colleagues and students at Middlesex University and by all her friends and family.

Type
Special Tribute
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 38 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.The German Master, Version 2.0 (1993), Kosmos Software Ltd: Dunstable, Beds.Google Scholar
2.Vocab (Wortspielerei), Version 2.0 (1994), Wida Software: London.Google Scholar
3.Fun with Texts, Version 2.1e, (1992), Camsoft: Maidenhead, Berks.Google Scholar
4.Travel Talk (1994), Libra Multimedia Ltd: Windsor, Berks.Google Scholar
5.Gapkit (1996), Camsoft: Maidenhead, Berks.Google Scholar
6.Meara, P. M. (1983) ‘Word associations in a foreign language’, Nottingham Linguistics Circular 11 (2), 29–38.Google Scholar
7. Ibid, 5.Google Scholar
8. Ibid, 35.Google Scholar
9.Shillaw, J. (1996) ‘The application of Rasch modelling to yes/no vocabulary tests’, Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group Virtual Library, University of Wales, Swansea.Google Scholar
10.Wesche, M. and Paribakht, T. S. (1996) ‘Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: depth versus breadth’, The Canadian Modern Language Review 53 (1), 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Meara, P. M. and Sanchez, I. R. (1997) ‘Matrix models of vocabulary acquisition: an empirical assessment’. Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group Virtual Library, University of Wales, Swansea.Google Scholar
12.Ellis, N. (1995) ‘Vocabulary acquisition: psychological perspectives’, The Language Teacher 19 (2), 13.Google Scholar
13.Op. cit.Google Scholar
14.Ibid.Google Scholar
15.Liddell, P. (1994) ‘Learners and second language acquisition: a union blessed by CALL?', CALL 7 (2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Goodfellow, R. and Powell, C. (1994)‘Approaches to vocabulary learning: Data from a CALL interaction’, ReCALL 6 (1), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Laurillard, D. (1991) ‘Principles of computerbased software design for language learning’, CALL 4 (3), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Tinkham, T. (1993) ‘The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary’, System 21 (3), 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Crowderl, R. G. (1976) ‘Principles of learning and memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
20.Hunt, R. R. and Mitchell, D. B. (1982) ‘Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 8 (1), 81–97.Google Scholar
21. See for example: Clarke, J. A. (1994) ‘Cognitive style and computer-assisted learning: problems and a possible solution’, Alt-J 1 (1), 47–59;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, P. (1993) ‘Methodological considerations for the design of CALL programs’. In Hall, A. and Baumgartner, P. (eds.). Language learning with computers, WIL. 76–101.Google Scholar
22.Op. cit., 167.Google Scholar
23.Language learning with computers, 168.Google Scholar
24.Ellis, , op. cit., 14.Google Scholar
25.Language learning with computers, 15.Google Scholar
26.Language learning with computers, 16.Google Scholar
27.Saragi, T., Nation, I. S. P. and Meister, G. (1978) ‘Vocabulary learning and’, System (6),70–78.Google Scholar
28.Grace, C. (1996) ‘Effects of the first language on the retention of second language vocabulary’, CALICO 96 unpublished conference paper.Google Scholar