Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:22:27.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to offer real help to grammar learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Johan Vanparys  and
Lut Baten
Johan Vanparys
Affiliation:
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Belgium
Lut Baten
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses strategies for creating a supportive grammar learning environment, which have been implemented in CALL packages for Dutch. They stem from recent advances in cognitive psychology and cognitive linguistics, as well as our own experience. The basic metaphor behind our conception of the ideal CALL package is that of a toolbox rather than a set of instructions. Users select a tool from a range of available instruments because they think it is the one that suits their purpose best. Different learners may pick out different tools and use them in different ways, even if their goals are the same.

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 1999 , pp. 125 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, J. (1987) Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon, Oxford: Basil Black-well.Google Scholar
Baten, L. & Vanparys, J. (1995) “Is 't weer op de computer? – Over niet-ingeloste verwachtingen met computer-ondersteund taalonderwijs”. In Janssens, G., Hiligsmann, P. & Theissen, S. (eds.), Leermiddelen voor het Nederlands als Vreemde Taal, Liège: Liège Language and Literature, 143–157.Google Scholar
Baten, L., De Coutere, B., Schoenmakers, R., Albrecht, A. & Vanparys, J. (1996) Stepln, Tilburg: Escape. (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
Baten, L. & Van der wijst, P. (1994) “Guidelines for the development of the EuroGram computer programs”. Internal EuroLing report.Google Scholar
Bull, S. (1997) “Promoting effective learning strategy use in CALL”, Computer Assisted Language Learning 10, 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., Albrecht, A. & Waumans, W. (1995) “Foreign language learning by computer: Principles, fundamentals and instructions for the setting up of a database”. In Dirven, R. & Vanparys, J. (eds.) Current Approaches to the Lexicon, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 463–490.Google Scholar
Engels, L.K. (1978) “Pedagogical grammar as applied semiotics”. Trier: L.A.U.T. (Series B, n° 38).Google Scholar
Engels, L.K., van Beckhoven, B., de Bisschop, T., Goethals, M., Kortmann, B. & Dirven, R. (1989) “Time, tense and aspects”. In Dirven, R. & Geiger, R.A. (eds.) A user's grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction. Part B: The structure of sentences, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 311–354.Google Scholar
Heidemann, A. (1996) The visualization of foreign language vocabulary in CALL, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (1997) “The TELL Consortium – Formative evaluation report”, Hull: CTICML, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Narcy, J.P. (1990) Apprendre une langue étrangère, Paris: Editions d'Organisation.Google Scholar
Oostdam, R. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1995) Towards Strategic Language Learning, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood, Smith M. (1995) “Language awareness, consiousness raising and the enhancement of input”. Lecture given at the symposium “Grammatica Opnieuw Bekeken” (Grammar Reconsidered) at the University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
s.n. (1995) The Windows® interface guidelines for software design, Redmond (WA): Microsoft Press.Google Scholar
Vanparys, J. (1995) “Introduction: Coming to grips with the lexicon”. In Dirven, R. & Vanparys, J. (eds.) Current Approaches to the Lexicon, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, xi–xix.Google Scholar
Vanparys, J. (1996) Categories and complements of illocutionary verbs in a cognitive perspective, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vanparys, J., Baten, L., Claes, M.T. & Dieltjens, L. (1996) Interactief Nederlands 2 – Multimediamethode Nederlands op basis van de Woordenschat, Brussels: Didacta (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Vanparys, J., Baten, L., Dirven, R., Meijers, G. & Vander, Wijst P. (1996) EuroGram Dutch, Tilburg: Escape (courseware).Google Scholar
Vanparys, J., Callut, J.P., Claes, M.T., Pétré, R., Sirjacobs, G. & Thys-Frère, S. (1996) Interactief Nederlands – Multimediamethode Nederlands op basis van de Grammatica.Google Scholar
Vanparys, J., Zimmer, C., Xinghua, L., & Kelly, P. (1997) “Some salient and persistent difficulties encountered by Chinese and Francophone students in the learning of English vocabulary”, ITL – Review of applied linguistics (115–116), 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vekemans, L. (1994) “The sad tale of Grammareila”, Info ILT September (1994) 4–6.Google Scholar
Verlinde, S (1993) “Use approche alternative de la grammaire”, Info-Frans 20 (3), 7–17.Google Scholar