Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:08:20.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From action research to the implementation of ICT pedagogical tools: taking into account students’ needs to propose adjusted online tutorial practice*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2010

Cédric Brudermann
Cédric Brudermann*
Affiliation:
UPMC, Paris VI. Département des langues, Bâtiment S. 4, place Jussieu. 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper deals with the implementation of an “online pedagogical assistant” in a blended learning device for English for Special Purposes (ESP) students in a French university (UPMC, Paris VI). As it is now, it comprises a customized website designed to serve as a guide through the development of the students’ work.

The architecture of this website and the way it is meant to be used are parameters derived from the conclusions of action research carried out in 2007–2008 in another French university (Perpignan) amongst B1/B2 ESP students.1 The perspective of that study was to examine their needs when performing off site aural and written tasks. The data collected showed that the problems encountered were always the same – outlining a typology – and that most obstacles derived from A2/B1 elements they had already been through during their secondary education.

This application has been named an “online pedagogical assistant” because, by targeting the problems from the typology, it aims at leading students take care of their needs by themselves before emailing their productions to their tutor(s), particularly by pushing them into reflecting on a certain number of aspects they are already acquainted with but which they nonetheless tend to forget when working on their own.

From the typology of problems, a system of semi-automatic correction meant to help students proceed to self-corrections – notably through online references to relevant online help and exercises – has also been developed. In the correction phase of the students’ tasks, the purpose is therefore no longer for the tutor to correct their productions but to help them do it themselves.

Action research is in progress to evaluate the potential of those adjusted online tutorial practices in terms of second language (L2) acquisition.

Keywords

Blended learningonline tutoringICTtaskaction researchESP students
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 172 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R. W. (eds.) (1983) Pidginization and Creolization as Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1995) Working memory. In: Gazzaniga, M. S. (eds.) The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 755–764.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. (2004) L’approche par tâches dans l’apprentissage de l’anglais de spécialité: opérationnalisation contrôlée dans l’enseignement supérieur. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Nantes.Google Scholar
Brudermann, C. (in press) Analyse de l’efficacité des stratégies de travail des étudiants à distance dans un dispositif hybride – Etape d’une recherche-action. ALSIC.Google Scholar
Cárdenas-Claros, M.Gruba, P. (2009) Examining help options in CALL. CALICO Journal, 27(1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M.Lockhart, R. S. (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11: 671–684.Google Scholar
De Pietro, J.-F., Matthey, M.Py, B. (1989) Acquisition et contrat didactique: les séquences potentiellement acquisitionnelles de la conversation exolingue. In: Weil, D. and Fugier, H. (eds.) Actes du troisième colloque régional de linguistique. Strasbourg: Université des sciences humaines et Université Louis Pasteur, 99–124.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.Sinclair, S. G. (1996) Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1): 234–250.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2007) How Do We Know What Students Are Actually Doing? Monitoring Students’ Behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5): 409–442.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1977) The Theory of Affordances. In: Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 68–83.Google Scholar
Guichon, N. (2006) Langues et TICE. méthodologie de conception multimédia. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Guiora, A. Z.Acton, W. R. (1979) Personality and language behaviour: a restatement. Language Learning, 29(1): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narcy-Combes, J.-P.Narcy-Combes, M.-F. (2007) La tâche comme moyen d’optimiser l’enseignement/apprentissage en anglais pour les disciplines autres dans le contexte universitaire français. Français dans le Monde (le): recherches et applications, 42: 73–87.Google Scholar
Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2005) Didactique des langues et TIC: vers une recherche-action responsable. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Pernin, J.-Ph.Godinet, H. (2008) Rapport de recherche (2005–2007) du projet ACTEURS (Activités Collectives et Tutorat dans l’Enseignement Universitaire: Réalitiés, Scénarios et usages des TICE). Lyon: INRP http://eductice.inrp.fr/EducTice/projets/scenario/acteurs/RapportProjetACTEURS.pdfGoogle Scholar
Redding, T. R. (2001) High self–directed learning: A national imperative in the information age? In: Long, H. B. and Associates (eds.) Self-directed learning and the information age. Boynton Beach, FL: Motorola University, 44–61.Google Scholar
Rouet, J.-F. (2000) Cognition et technologies d’apprentissage: quelques questions et pistes de recherche. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 4(5): 21–32.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(3): 209–231.Google Scholar
Spear, G. E.Mocker, D. W. (1984) The organizing circumstance: Environmental determinants in self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Van Harmelen, M. (2006) Personal Learning Environments. Proceedings of the sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’06), Los Alamitos, CA, IEEE Computer Society, 815–816.Google Scholar
Young, D. J. (1992) Language anxiety from the foreign language specialist’s perspective: Interviews with Krashen, Omaggio Hadley, Terrell, and Rardin. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 157–172.Google Scholar