Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:22:20.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of data-driven learning upon vocabulary acquisition for secondary international school students in Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2015

Jacob Nolen Karras
Jacob Nolen Karras*
Affiliation:
Singapore International School, Vietnam (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the field of computer assisted language learning (CALL), scant literature exists regarding the effectiveness and practicality for secondary students to utilize data-driven learning (DDL) for vocabulary acquisition. In this study, there were 100 participants, who had a mean age of thirteen years, and were attending an international school in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. This particular milieu unsurprisingly comprised ‘third culture kids’ (TCKs) and ‘cross-cultural kids’ (CCKs). They were assigned to a control and experimental group; both had several intensive weeks of online-dictionary learning training, while the experimental group also experienced intensive DDL training. This was done prior to the start of the eight-week longitudinal study. Major findings included a significant longitudinal main effect for both groups, significantly overall higher results for the experimental group than the control, and a significant difference among subjects’ grade level was discovered. Furthermore, the experimental group exhibited a significantly marked increase in vocabulary results in the later weeks of the experiment. In general, these results show that DDL can be successful in the secondary school English as a foreign language (EFL) context and that it promotes significantly better vocabulary acquisition when used in conjunction with online-dictionary vocabulary learning methods, especially for a sustained longitudinal period of time.

Keywords

Corporadata-driven learningonline-dictionary learningsecond language vocabulary acquisition
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 166 - 186
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balunda, S. A. (2009) Teaching academic vocabulary with corpora: Student perceptions of data-driven learning. MA Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S. (2004) Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In: Sinclair, J. (ed.), How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 15–36.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (2001) Using corpus-based methods to investigate grammar and use: Some case studies on the use of verbs in English. In: Simpson, R. and Swales J. (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 symposium. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 101–115.Google Scholar
Bloch, J. (2009) The design of an online concordancing program for teaching about reporting verbs. Language Learning & Technology, 13: 59–78.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2008) Looking for empirical evidence of data-driven learning at lower levels. In: Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (ed.), Corpus linguistics, computer tools, and applications– state of the art. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 581–598.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2009) Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A. (2010a) Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3): 534–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A. (2010b) Learning outcomes from corpus consultation. In: Moreno Jaén, M., Serrano Valverde, F. and Calzada Pérez, M. (eds.), Exploring new paths in language pedagogy: Lexis and corpus-based language teaching. London: Equinox, 129–144.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2011a) What data for data-driven learning? The EUROCALL Review, 20: 23–27.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2011b) Data-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In: Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. (ed.), Explorations across languages and corpora. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 563–580.Google Scholar
Braun, S. (2007) Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora. ReCALL, 19(3): 307–328.Google Scholar
Brezina, V. and Gablasova, D. (2015) Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguitics, 36(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Carder, M. (2007) Bilingualism in international schools. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Carder, M. (2008) The development of ESL provision in Australia, Canada, the USA and England, with conclusion for second language models in international schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2): 205–231.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (1997) Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System, 25: 301–315.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (1999) Breadth and depth of lexical acquisition with hands-on concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12: 345–360.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2003) Do corpus-based electronic dictionaries replace concordancers?. In: Morrison, B., Green, G. and Motteram, G. (eds.), Directions in CALL: Experience, experiments, evaluation. Hong Kong: Polytechnic University, 179–206.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2007) Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3): 38–63.Google Scholar
Cottrell, A. and Useem, R. (1993a) Article 2. TCKs Four Times More Likely to Earn Bachelor’s Degrees. NewsLinks – The newspaper of International Schools Services, XII, No. 5. [Online] Available from http://www.tckworld.com/useem/art2.html [Accessed: 14 June 2014].Google Scholar
Cottrell, A. and Useem, R. (1993b) Article 5. ATCKs maintain global dimensions throughout their lives. NewsLinks — The newspaper of International Schools Services, XIII, No. 4. [Online] Available from http://www.tckworld.com/useem/art5.html [Accessed: 14 June 2014].Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2): 213–238.Google Scholar
Davies, G. (2004) “CALL” Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies. [Online] available from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/61. [Accessed: 4 June 2014].Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. [Online] Available from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/. [Accessed: December 28, 2014].Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (1995) The psychology of foreign language acquisition: Implications for CALL. International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), 8: 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folse, K. (2010) Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1): 139–160.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014) The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL, 26: 128–146.Google Scholar
Gaskell, D. and Cobb, T. (2004) Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3): 301–319.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L. (2001) The learner as researcher: Introducing corpus concordancing in the classroom. In: Aston, G. (ed.), Learning with corpora. Houston, TX: Athelstan, 108–137.Google Scholar
Geluso, J. and Yamaguchi, A. (2014) Discovering formulaic language through data-driven learning: Student attitudes and efficacy. ReCALL, 26(2): 225–242.Google Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, P. and Read, J. (1990) How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11(4): 341–363.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2002) A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In: Granger, S., Hung, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–33.Google Scholar
Haldimann, M. and Hollington, A. (2004) Effective learning support in international schools. Suffolk, UK: Peridot Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, M. and Thompson, J. (2008) International schools: Growth and influence. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Horst, M. and Cobb, T. (2001) Growing academic vocabulary with a collaborative online database. In: Morrison, B., Gardner, D., Keobke, K. and Spratt, M. (eds.), ELT Perspectives on IT & Multimedia. Hong Kong: Polytechnic University Press, 189–226.Google Scholar
Horst, M., Cobb, T. and Nicolae, I. (2005) Expanding academic vocabulary with a collaborative on-line database. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2): 90–110.Google Scholar
Huang, Z. (2014) The effects of paper-based DDL on the acquisition of lexico-grammatical patterns in L2 writing. ReCALL, 26(2): 163–183.Google Scholar
Hulstijin, J. H. (2001) Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In: Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–286.Google Scholar
ISC Research. (2014 ICEF Monitor: New data on international schools suggests continued strong growth. [Online] Available at: http://monitor.icef.com/2014/03/new-data-on-international-schools-suggests-continued-strong-growth-2/ [Accessed: 25 October 2014].Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1991) From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In: Johns, T. and King, P. (eds.), Classroom Concordancing. English Language Research Journal, 4: 27–45.Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1997) Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In: Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery T. and Knowles G. (eds.), Teaching and Language Corpora. London: Longman, 100–115.Google Scholar
Johns, T., Lee, H. and Wang, L. (2008) Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5): 483–506.Google Scholar
Karras, J. (2011) Creating an Asian third culture kid linguistic profile: A comparison of linguistic motivations among Asian third culture kids and their peers in international schools. MA Thesis, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
Kettemann, B. (1995) On the use of concordancing in ELT. TELL & CALL, 4: 4–15.Google Scholar
Knight, S. (1994) Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3): 285–299.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1989) We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73: 440–464.Google Scholar
Kwon, D. H. (2006) Living in a Yellow Submarine: Third Culture Experience of Korean Missionary Kids at Faith Academy. Proceeding of the Asia Culture Forum 2006: Multiculturalism in Asia. Kwangju, Korea. [Online] Available from: http://cct.pa.go.kr/data/acf2006/multi/multi_0402_Dong-Hwan%20Kwon.pdf [Accessed: 30 June 2014].Google Scholar
Loucky, J. P. (2005) Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with CALL web sites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5): 389–416.Google Scholar
Matthews, M. (1989) The scale of international education. International Schools Journals, 17(7): 7–17.Google Scholar
McCaig, N. M. (1996) Understanding Global Nomads. In: Smith, C. D. (ed.), Strangers at Home: Essays on the effects of living overseas and coming home to a strange land. New York: Aletheia, 99–120.Google Scholar
McCarten, J. (2007) Teaching Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. (2004) Bridging the gap between applied corpus linguistics and the reality of English language teaching in Germany. In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 239–250.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Newbury.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1): 59–82.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2011) Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44: 529–539.Google Scholar
Oghigian, K. and Chujo, K. (2010) An effective way to use corpus exercises to learn grammar basics in English. Language Education in Asia, 1: 200–214.Google Scholar
Owen, C. (1996) Do concordances require to be consulted? ELT Journal, 50(3): 219–224.Google Scholar
Pollock, D. C. (1988) “TCK Definition”, Copyrighted.Google Scholar
Pollock, D. C. and Van Reken, R. E. (2009) The third culture kid experience: Growing up among worlds. Revised edition. Boston and London: Nicolas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Robinson, N., Keough, B. and Kusuma-Powell, O. (2004) Who are ESL Learners?. In: Kusuma-Powell, O. and Powell, W. (eds.), Count me in! Developing inclusive international schools. Washington, DC: Overseas School Advisory Council [Online] Available from http://www.state.gov/m/a/os/44038.htm [Accessed: 28 December 2014].Google Scholar
Römer, U. (2009) Corpus research and practice: What help do teachers need and what can we offer?. In: Aijmer, K. (ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–98.Google Scholar
Shaw, E. (2011) Teaching vocabulary through data-driven learning, [Online] Available from: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/files/Teaching_Vocabulary_Through_DDL.pdf [Accessed: 10 June 2014].Google Scholar
Shei, C. C. and Pain, H. (2000) An ESL writer’s collocational aid. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2): 167–182.Google Scholar
Stevens, V. (1991) Concordance-based vocabulary exercises: A viable alternative to gap-fillers. In: Johns, T. and King, P. (eds.), Classroom Concordancing. English Language Research Journal, 4: 47–61.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2007) A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2): 105–120.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. (2003) Learning process, strategies and web-based concordancers: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5): 601–613.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. and Wang, L. Y. (2003) Concordancers in the EFL classroom: Cognitive approaches and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1): 83–94.Google Scholar
Talai, T. and Fotovatnia, Z. (2012) Data-driven learning: A student-centered technique for language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7): 1526–1531.Google Scholar
Tanu, D. (2008) Global nomads: Towards a study of “Asian” third culture kids. Presented at: The 17th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia Melbourne: Australia. [Online] from: http://artsonline.monash.edu.au/mai/files/2012/07/danautanu.pdf. [Accessed: 28 June 2014].Google Scholar
Thurstun, J. and Candlin, C. (1998) Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English. English for Specific Purposes. 17(3): 267–280.Google Scholar
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2003) The multilingual mind: Issues discussed by, for, and about people living with many languages. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
West, M. (1953) A general service list of English words. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Yoon, H. and Hirvela, A. (2004) ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13: 257–283.Google Scholar
Zahar, R., Cobb, T. and Spada, N. (2001) Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4): 541–572.Google Scholar