Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:31:49.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussing course literature online: analysis of macro speech acts in an asynchronous computer conference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Riitta Kosunen
Riitta Kosunen
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, PB 1000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a macro speech act analysis of computer-mediated conferencing on a university course on language pedagogy. Students read scholarly articles on language learning and discussed them online, in order to make sense of them collaboratively in preparation for a reflective essay. The study explores how the course participants made use of computer-mediated conferencing for such collaborative text processing. A discussion thread with 97 messages was analyzed for its macro speech acts. The conference messages were treated as pragmatic macrostructures where micro-level speech act sequences can be mapped onto a higher-level, global speech act or textual function. The discussion turned out to be reader-centred and practice-oriented. Approximately two thirds of the messages were concerned with interpreting theory from a practical point of view, expressing the students’ personal experience, opinion or idea about a certain issue related to the article. In comparison, only one tenth dealt with checking the explicit propositional content of the article. The results are interpreted in terms of the distinction between a narrative and paradigmatic/expository discourse.

Keywords

Computer conferencingcollaborative text processingmacro speech actnarrative and paradigmatic/expository discourse
Type
Regular Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 337 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angeli, C., Valanides, N.Bonk, C. J. (2003) Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1): 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C. (2004) Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: how texts organize activity and people. In: Bazerman, C. and Prior, P. (eds.) What Writing Does and How It Does It. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 309–339.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C.Scardamalia, M. (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L.Day, J. D. (1983) Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eubanks, P. (2004) Poetics and narrativity: How texts tell stories. In: Bazerman, C. and Prior, P. (eds.) What Writing Does and How It Does It. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 33–56.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2005) E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: the need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. A., Millie, S. S.Alman, S. W. (2006) Mapping MLIS asynchronous discussions. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(1). http://www.itdl.org/Journal/jan_06/article01.htmGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. (2002) Narrative and expository macro-genres. In: Johns, A. M. (ed.) Genre in the Classroom. Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 249–283.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. (2001) Beyond threaded discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3): 207–221.Google Scholar
Järvelä, S.Häkkinen, P. (2002) Web-based cases in teaching and learning – the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2004) A Philosophy of Second Language Acquisition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L.Strijbos, J. W. (2004) CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In: Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A. and Martens R. L. (eds.) What We Know About CSCL and Implementing it in Higher Education. London: Kluwer Academic Press, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, I. (2004) Samtal och interaction – ett andraspråksperspektiv. In: Hyltenstam, K. and Lindberg, I. (eds.) Svenska som andraspråk – i forskning, undervisning och samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 461–499.Google Scholar
Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K.Paavola, S. (2004) Practices and orientations of CSCL. In: Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A. and Martens R. L. (eds.) What We Know About CSCL and Implementing it in Higher Education. London: Kluwer Academic Press, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N. (2000) Words & Minds. How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, J.McDonough, S. (1997) Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
McNiff, J. with Whitehead, J. (2002) Action Research. Principles and Practice. 2nd edition. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M.Nunes, M. B. (2004) Developing Innovation in Online Learning: An Action Research Framework. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1997) Opening Dialogue. Understanding the Dynamics of Language Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R.Archer, W. (1999) Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2). http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/153/341.Google Scholar
Saarenkunnas, M. (2004) Multidimensional Participation in Polycontextual Computer-Supported Language Learning. University of Oulu: Acta Universitatis Ouluensis.Google Scholar
Salmon, G. (2002) Approaches to researching teaching and learning online. In: Steeples, C. and Jones, C. (eds.) Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. London: Springer, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M.Bereiter, C. (1996) Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In: Koschmann, T. (ed.) CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 249–268.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M.Bereiter, C. (1999) Schools as knowledge building organisations. In: Keating, D. and Hertzman, C. (eds.) Today’s Children, Tomorrow’s Society: The Developmental Health and Wealth of Nations. New York: Guilford, 274–289.Google Scholar
Searle, J. A. (1979) Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27: 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (1996) The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tynjälä, P. (2001) Writing, learning and the development of expertise. In: Tynjälä, P., Mason, L. and Lonka, K. (eds.) Writing as a Learning Tool. Integrating Theory and Practice. Dordercht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W.Simons, P. R. J. (2006) The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3): 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1980) Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) The study of discourse. In: van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse As Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: a Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 1. London: Sage, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2000) From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–259.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2007) Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegerif, R. (2007) Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar