Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-x5np6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T06:53:58.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CALL research: Where are we now?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2020

John Gillespie Open the ORCID record for John Gillespie [Opens in a new window]
John Gillespie*
Affiliation:
Ulster University, UK ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers the current position of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) research by producing an integrative synthetic overview of all the articles published in three leading international CALL journals: ReCALL (in its 31st year of publication), the CALICO Journal (its 36th) and Computer Assisted Language Learning journal (its 32nd) over a sustained recent period: 2006–2016. They are judged sufficiently representative to enable broad trends to be detected and the sector’s strengths and weaknesses to be identified. The focus is on CALL research’s international reach, the range of topics researched and the nature of the studies themselves. The findings suggest that CALL research is growing internationally in the number of countries and researchers involved. A wide range of topics is researched, but there is a concentration of papers published on a cluster of popular areas. Consequently, fewer articles are published on a large number of CALL topics or, in some cases, rarely studied. The research methods employed are rigorous: in writing, structure, theory, literature awareness, and discussion and presentation of results, yet there are still weaknesses. Most empirical studies are small scale: based on one institution, a small cohort of students, over a short period of time and seldom followed up. Based on these findings, suggestions are made with a view to broadening and strengthening CALL research through targeting neglected strategic areas with special journal issues and conferences, and improving the quality of research projects. Key areas for future research are proposed.

Keywords

CALL topicsresearch strategyinterdisciplinaritycultural CALL
Type
Regulars papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 127 - 144
Check for updates
Copyright
© European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bertin, J.-C. & Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2012) Tutoring at a distance: Modelling as a tool to control chaos. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.639785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. (2014a) The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1): 103–125. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.103-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. (2014b) A survey of MALL curriculum integration: What the published research doesn’t tell. CALICO Journal, 31(3): 303–322. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.3.303-322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. (2014c) MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4): 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. (2015) Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. & Arispe, K. (2018) Looking for a needle in a haystack: CALL and advanced language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 35(1): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.31594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A. & Bax, S. (2006) Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System, 34(4): 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2005) CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal, 23(1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i1.5-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. & Voss, E. (2016) 20 years of technology and language assessment in Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2): 116–128. https://doi.org/10125/44464Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2012) Replication studies in CALL research. CALICO Journal, 29(4): 591–600. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.591-600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2006) Toward an ontological approach in goal-oriented language courseware design and its implications for technology-independent content structuring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2–3): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600821461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2012) The “publish and perish” syndrome. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5): 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.735101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. (2007) How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5): 409–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701746013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. (2008) Introduction to the special issue. CALICO Journal, 25(3): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.377-384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014) The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL, 26(2): 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaudan, O. (2016) Too soon to fly the coop? Online journaling to support students’ learning during their Erasmus study visit. ReCALL, 28(2): 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, N. (2008) The reinvention of different kinds of wheels … CALICO Journal, 25(3): 385–386. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.385-386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimeno-Sanz, A. (2016) Moving a step further from “integrative CALL”. What’s to come? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6): 1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1103271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjistassou, S. K. (2012) An activity theory exegesis on conflict and contradictions in networked discussions and feedback exchanges. CALICO Journal, 29(2): 367–388. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.2.367-388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2008) Twenty-five years of theory in the CALICO Journal. CALICO Journal, 25(3): 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.387-399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2016) Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge, 24–38.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Levy, M. (2009) Sustainability and computer-assisted language learning: Factors for success in a context of change. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(5): 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903345218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2018) Teaching foreign languages in the digital age. EUROCALL 2018. Future-proof CALL: Language learning as explorations and encounters. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University, 22–25 August.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009) Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. P. (2010) Electronic literary texts: A survey of tools and some strategies for developers. CALICO Journal, 27(3): 477–490. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.3.477-490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. (2007) Culture, culture learning and new technologies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2): 104–127. https://doi.org/10125/44106Google Scholar
Levy, M. & Steel, C. (2015) Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(2): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401400038XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T. (2011) Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, C. P. & Cooper, M. (2013) Computer-based oral exams in Italian language studies. ReCALL, 25(3): 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001) Digital native, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816Google Scholar
Sauro, S. (2011) SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 28(2): 369–391. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.369-391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shei, C.-C. (2008) Discovering the hidden treasure on the Internet: Using Google to uncover the veil of phraseology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, C. H. & Levy, M. (2013) Language students and their technologies: Charting the revolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25(3): 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S. & Smith, B. (2015) Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35: 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinder, R. (2016) Blending technology and face-to-face: Advanced students’ choices. ReCALL, 28(1): 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gillespie supplementary material

Gillespie supplementary material

Download Gillespie supplementary material(File)
File 32.7 KB