Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:11:26.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘all-inclusive’ tutor – excluding learner autonomy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Markus Ritter ,
Christiane Kallenbach  and
James Pankhurst
Markus Ritter
Affiliation:
University of Siegen, Berlin, Germany
Christiane Kallenbach
Affiliation:
Cornsen Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multimedia learning environment would appear to benefit from an intelligent tutoring system that draws on didactic expertise, knowledge of the program structure, and knowledge of the learner's previous activities. On the other hand, one may argue against a tutor because of the damaging effects on learner autonomy: the tutor may hamper genuine learning by taking the learner by the hand, whereas what the learner needs is to have sufficient space to move freely through material in an explorative rather than an executive mode, generating her own queries and finding her own solutions. It is argued that tutoring may be a necessary stage on the road to autonomy.

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 1999 , pp. 111 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwright, R. D. (1984) “Why don't learners learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis”. In Singleton, D. & Little, D. (eds.) Language learning informal and informal contexts, Dublin: IRAAL. 3–18.Google Scholar
Digeser, A. (1988) “Hemmt explizites Sprachwissen das Fremdsprachenlernen?” Praxis 35 (3), 227–238.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L. (1997) “Exploring texts through the concordancer: guiding the learnr”. In Wichmann, A, Fligelstone, S, McEnery, T, Knowles, G (eds.), Teaching and language corpora, Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., 83–99.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy in foreign language learning, Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kallenbach, C. (1996) Subjektive Theorien – Was Schülerinnen und Schüler uber Fremdsprachenlernen denken, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1987) “Communicative language teaching: making it work”, English language Teaching journal 41 (2), 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenden, E. (1991) Learner strategies for learner autonomy, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar