Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:01:09.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: an emic approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2013

Geoffrey Sockett
Geoffrey Sockett*
Affiliation:
DLADL, Université de Strasbourg, 22 rue René Descartes, 67000 Strasbourg (email:[email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research into the online informal learning of English has already shown it to be a widespread phenomenon involving a range of comprehension and production activities such as viewing original version television series, listening to music on demand and social networking with other English users.

Dynamic systems theory provides a suitable framework within which to study informal learning because it emphasises the unique range of resources, strategies and relationships which contribute to non-linear language development for each learner.

While research into the impact of these activities for language development has yielded some data regarding vocabulary gains and improvements in fluency and comprehension skills, the mechanisms at work in such language development have proved difficult to study because of the private nature of most online informal learning. In this study, an emic approach is adopted, involving a group of students experienced in second language acquisition research, who used blogs to report on their own online informal learning of English over a three-month period. Extensive examples from these blogs are used to build up a picture of the learning processes at work, within a framework suggested by the literature of complex dynamic systems. These results allow conclusions to be drawn regarding the way in which these processes are used by informal learners in different phases of real communicative tasks.

Keywords

informal learningdynamic systems theoryemic approacheslearning blogs.
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 48 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference. Language Policy Division, Strasbourg. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cross, J. (2006) Informal learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.Cameron, L. (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, M.Chamot, A. (1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. (1954) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rieder, A. (2003) Implicit and explicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition. Views, 12-2. University of Vienna, http://www.univie.ac.at/Anglistik/views/03_2/RIE_SGLE.PDFGoogle Scholar
Rupérez Micola, A., Bris, A., Banal-Estañol, A. (2009) TV or Not TV? Subtitles and English Skills. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1403964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G. (2001) Quel fondement théorique pour les stratégies d'apprentissage cognitives? CRAPEL, Université Nancy 2. Mélanges, 26: 185–193.Google Scholar
Sockett, G. (2011a) Les processus cognitifs de résolution de problèmes pour l'apprentissage des langues dans des environnements multimédia: Apprentissage informel et réseaux sociaux. Les Cahiers de l'ACEDLE, 8(1): 29–46.Google Scholar
Sockett, G. (2011b) From the cultural hegemony of English to online informal learning: Cluster frequency as an indicator of relevance in authentic documents. Asp, 60: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G. (2012) La complexité au service de l'apprentissage informel de l'anglais en ligne. ALSIC, 15 (2): http://alsic.revues.org/2505Google Scholar
Sockett, G.Toffoli, D. (2012) Beyond learner autonomy: a dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2): 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A. (2010). Etude sur l'impact des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) et des nouveaux médias sur l'apprentissage des langues. Commission Européenne. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/studies/documents/study_impact_ict_new_media_language_learning/final_report_fr.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tissot, P. (2004) Terminology of vocational training policy. A multilingual glossary for an enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
Toffoli, D.Sockett, G. (2010) How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. Asp, 58: 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. London, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (2008) An introduction to complex dynamic systems. Modern Language Journal, 92(2): 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar