Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:11:44.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of a multimedia web annotation system and its effect on the EFL writing and speaking performance of junior high school students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

Wu-Yuin Hwang ,
Rustam Shadiev  and
Szu-Min Huang
Wu-Yuin Hwang*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology at the National Central University. No. 300, Jhongda Rd., Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Rustam Shadiev*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology at the National Central University. No. 300, Jhongda Rd., Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Szu-Min Huang*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology at the National Central University. No. 300, Jhongda Rd., Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve students’ English as Foreign Language (EFL) writing and speaking performance with appropriate learning activity design supported by Virtual Pen (VPen), a multimedia web annotation system. Students’ perceptions toward using VPen and learningactivities, attitude toward using VPen, actual VPen usage and their relationships were also investigated. After the experiment the students perceived that VPen was easy to use and useful during learning activities, and generally had a positive attitude toward using VPen. Furthermore, the students believed that learning activities were ‘playful’ and useful for improving writing and speaking performance. Further investigation revealed that the students’ actual VPen usage had a significant correlation with speaking and writing performance and that students’ speaking and writing performance significantly correlated with learning achievement. Based on our findings, we conclude that designed learning activities supported by the VPen system could facilitate students’ writing and speaking performance and therefore improve their learning achievement.

Keywords

Annotation systemmultimedia assisted language learning‘playfulness’usefulnesslanguage productive skillsspeaking and writing
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , 16 May 2011 , pp. 160 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariew, R.Ercetin, G. (2004) Exploring the Potential of Hypermedia Annotations for Second Language Reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. (1983) Risk-taking and the language learner. In: Seliger, H.Long, M. H. (eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 39–66.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2001) Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Caldwell, S. (1998) Going the distance with Online Instruction. VSTE Journal, 13(1): 3–6.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2006) CALL technologies for L2 reading. In: Ducate, L.Arnold, N. (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. CALICO Monograph Series Volume 5. Texas State University. San Marcos, TX: CALICO Publications, 69–98.Google Scholar
Chunga, J.Tan, F. B. (2004) Antecedents of perceived playfulness: an exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching websites. Information & Management, 41(7): 869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2005) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P.Warshaw, P. R. (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14): 1111–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1988) Classroom second language development. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (1991) The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hasan, M., Jekjantuk, N., Chanwirawong, Y.Nantajeewarawat, E. (2007) From Collaborative Video Library to Annotated. Learning Object Repository: Using Annotated Video Library in Personalized E-Learning. In: Iskander, M. (eds.), Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment and Engineering Education. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, N. P.Lee, D. W. (2004) A Discourse Analysis of Asynchronous Discussion Board on Students Critical Thinking. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
Hwang, W. Y.Wang, C. Y. (2004) A study on Application of Annotation System in Web-Based Materials. Paper presented at the GCCCE 2004 conference, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y.Sharples, M. (2007) A Study of Multimedia Annotation of Web-Based Material. Computers & Education, 48(4): 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R.Li, J. S. (in press) Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01126.x/pdf.Google Scholar
Lamy, M. N.Goodfellow, R. (1999) Reflective conversation in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2): 43–61.Google Scholar
Lin, H. P. (1995). A new English teaching design for adult Taiwanese learners. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 119.Google Scholar
Liu, N. F.Littlewood, W. (1997) Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3): 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakar, A.Ercetin, G. (2005) Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1): 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, B. (1995) What does reading mean for East Asian students? College ESL, 5(2): 35–48.Google Scholar
Sproull, L.Kiesler, S. (1991) Computers, network and work. Scientific American, 265(3): 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, R. W. (2009) Computer Assisted Language Learning: its future. In: Vyas, M. A.Patel, Y. L. (eds.), Teaching English As A Second Language: A New pedagogy for a new century. New Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 89–99.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2004) Technological change and the future of CALL. In: Fotos, S.Brown, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 15–25.Google Scholar
Wu, M. H. H. (1992) Classroom concordancing – where can we go from here? In: Bird, N.Harris, J. (eds.), QUILT and QUILL: Achieving and maintaining quality in language teaching and learning. Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Language, Education Department, 166–183.Google Scholar
Yang, S. C.Chen, Y. J. (2007) Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1): 860–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, S. W.Lo, J. J. (2009) Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52: 882–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, R. (2008) Interaction in EFL Classes. Asian Social Science, 4(4): 48–50.Google Scholar