Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T17:30:40.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: A synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Emrullah Yasin Çiftçi Open the ORCID record for Emrullah Yasin Çiftçi [Opens in a new window]  and
Perihan Savaş
Emrullah Yasin Çiftçi
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University, Turkey (email: [email protected])
Perihan Savaş
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University, Turkey (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In today’s globalized world, learning languages and developing intercultural skills are of paramount importance due to dynamic and complex global interdependencies. However, not every language student around the world has a chance to engage in face-to-face intercultural communication with people from different backgrounds. Telecollaboration offers a worthwhile opportunity by creating digital environments for language learners to communicate with people from diverse backgrounds. This qualitative meta-synthesis therefore aimed to investigate the research papers that were published between 2010 and 2015 in respect to language and intercultural learning within telecollaborative environments. Besides reporting emerging research trends among the studies, this synthesis study scrutinized recent emerging issues and observable patterns under five main themes: (1) the participants’ overall views on their telecollaborative experiences, (2) language learning through telecollaboration, (3) intercultural learning through telecollaboration, (4) the challenges experienced within the telecollaborative projects, and (5) the needs for further effective telecollaboration. Finally, this study synthesizes key emerging issues in telecollaborative projects and offers further research and practice directions in line with the current observable patterns.

Keywords

telecollaborationintercultural communicationintercultural competenceonline intercultural exchangeintercultural language learning.
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 278 - 298
Copyright
© European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Articles marked with an asterisk (*) were analyzed in this synthesis study.Google Scholar
Alptekin, C. (2002) Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57 Google Scholar
*Angelova, M. and Zhao, Y. (2016 [2014]) Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1): 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.907320 Google Scholar
*Antoniadou, V. (2011) Using activity theory to understand the contradictions in an online transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a foreign language. ReCALL, 23(3): 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000164 Google Scholar
Baran, E. (2014) A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4): 17–32.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. J. (1993) Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In Paige, R. M. (ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (2nd ed.). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 21–71.Google Scholar
*Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. and Kleban, M. (2016 [2014]) Matching linguistic and pedagogical objectives in a telecollaboration project: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1): 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.904360 Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
*Canto, S., Jauregi, K. and van den Bergh, H. (2013) Integrating cross-cultural interaction through video-communication and virtual worlds in foreign language teaching programs: Is there an added value? ReCALL, 25(1): 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000274 Google Scholar
Carney, N. (2006) Telecollaboration for intercultural learning: An overview of projects involving Japan. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1): 37–52.Google Scholar
*Chen, J. J. and Yang, S. C. (2016 [2014]) Promoting cross-cultural understanding and language use in research-oriented Internet-mediated intercultural exchange. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2): 262–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.937441 Google Scholar
Chen, W.-C., Shih, Y.-C. D. and Liu, G.-Z. (2015 [2013]) Task design and its induced learning effects in a cross-institutional blog-mediated telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4): 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818557 Google Scholar
*Chun, D. M. (2011) Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2): 392–419. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419 Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2015) Language and culture learning in higher education via telecollaboration. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.999775 Google Scholar
Çiftçi, E. Y. (2016) A review of research on intercultural learning through computer-based digital technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2): 313–327.Google Scholar
Collier, M. J. (2015) Intercultural communication competence: Continuing challenges and critical directions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48: 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.003 Google Scholar
Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. V. (2009) Research synthesis as a scientific process. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. (eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 3–16.Google Scholar
*Dooly, M. (2011) Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Task-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2): 69–91.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Hauck, M. and Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012) Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 82–102.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K. and Maillet, K. (2001) Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1): 55–102.Google Scholar
Galvan, J. L. (2013) Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2013) Integrating intercultural competence into language learning through technology. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2): 1–11.Google Scholar
Guth, S. and Helm, F. (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0013-6 Google Scholar
Guth, S. and Helm, F. (2012) Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal, 66(1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr027 Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. (2001) On ‘systematic’ reviews of research literatures: A ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5): 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095726 Google Scholar
*Helm, F., Guth, S. and Farrah, M. (2012) Promoting dialogue or hegemonic practice? Power issues in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2): 103–127.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2011) Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
*Lee, L. (2011) Focus-on-form through peer feedback in a Spanish–American telecollaborative exchange. Language Awareness, 20(4): 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.592589 Google Scholar
*Lee, L. and Markey, A. (2014) A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000111 Google Scholar
Lewis, T. and O’Dowd, R. (2016) Online intercultural exchange and foreign language learning: A systematic review. In O’Dowd, R. and Lewis, T. (eds.), Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. New York: Routledge, 21–68.Google Scholar
*Liaw, M.-L. and Bunn-Le Master, S. (2010) Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903467301 Google Scholar
Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2011) Changing reasons as reasoning changes: A narrative interview on second language classroom motivation, telecollaboration, and the learning of foreign languages. Language Awareness, 20(3): 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.570348 Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2007) Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. ELT Journal, 61(2): 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm007 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2011) Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? Language Teaching, 44(3): 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000194 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2013) Telecollaborative networks in university higher education: Overcoming barriers to integration. The Internet and Higher Education, 18: 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.02.001 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2015a) The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2): 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.853374 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2015b) Supporting in-service language educators in learning to telecollaborate. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2016) Emerging trends and new directions in telecollaborative learning. CALICO Journal, 33(3): 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i3.30747 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. and Ritter, M. (2006) Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 623–642.Google Scholar
*Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2010) Using virtual learning environments and computer-mediated communication to enhance the lexical competence of pre-service English teachers: A quantitative and qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221003666222 Google Scholar
Perry, L. B. and Southwell, L. (2011) Developing intercultural understanding and skills: Models and approaches. Intercultural Education, 22(6): 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.644948 Google Scholar
Sadler, R. and Dooly, M. (2016) Twelve years of telecollaboration: What we have learnt. ELT Journal, 70(4): 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw041 Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. and Emden, C. (1997) Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4): 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E 3.0.CO;2-E>Google Scholar
*Schenker, T. (2012) Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3): 449–470. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.449-470 Google Scholar
Suri, H. and Clarke, D. (2009) Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1): 395–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349 Google Scholar
Thornberg, R. and Charmaz, K. (2014) Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In Flick, U. (ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11 Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2): 38–67.Google Scholar
*Vinagre, M. and Muñoz, B. (2011) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1): 72–103.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. and Downe, S. (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2): 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x Google Scholar
*Ware, P. (2013) Teaching comments: Intercultural communication skills in the digital age. Intercultural Education, 24(4): 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2013.809249 Google Scholar
*Ware, P. and Kessler, G. (2016 [2014]) Telecollaboration in the secondary language classroom: Case study of adolescent interaction and pedagogical integration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3): 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.961481 Google Scholar
*Zhang, D. (2014) More than “hello” and “bye-bye”: Opening and closing the online chats in Mandarin Chinese. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6): 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776966 Google Scholar