Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:03:39.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the concept of distance for language learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

E. M. Esch
E. M. Esch
Affiliation:
The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper, it will be argued that the complexity of the language learning phenomenon has been overshadowed by the technical and organisational issues raised by the increase of physical distance between learners and teachers.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1995 , pp. 5 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Taeschner, T.The Sun is Feminine: A Study on Language Acquisition in Bilingual Chidren, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1983, p 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Gumperz, JJ. and Wilson, J. ‘Convergence and Creolisation: a case from Indo-Arian/ Dravidian border’, in Hymes, D. (ed) Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, CUP, 1971.Google Scholar
3Ben-Zeev, S. ‘Childhood Bilingualism and Intelligence’ in Hornby, P.A.Bilingualism, Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
4Shumann, J. H.The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second language Acquisition, Newbury House, Rowley, Mass. 1978.Google Scholar
5Esch, E. Native/Non-native Interaction: Foreigner Talk, Unpublished Thesis, Open University, 1992.Google Scholar
6Gardner, R.C. and Lambert, W. E.Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning, Newbury House, Rowley, Mass. 1972.Google Scholar
7Guiora, et al. ‘The effects of experimentally induced changes in ego states on pronunciationability in a second language: an exploratory study’. Comprehensive Psychiatry, Vol. 13: pp 421–428. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Rutter, D.R.Looking and Seeing: The role of Visual Communication in Social Interaction, Wiley, Chichester, 1984.Google Scholar
9Ochs, E.Culture and Language Development, CUP, 1988.Google Scholar
10Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.) Cultural Models in Language and Thought, CUP, 1987.Google Scholar
11Jin, L. and Cortazzi, M. ‘Cultural Orientation and Academic language Use’ in Graddol, D., Thompson, L. and Byram, M. (eds.) Language and Culture, Clevedon, BAAL & Multicultural Matters, 1993.Google Scholar
12Moran, T. and Harris, P.Managing Cultural Synergy, Houston Gulf Publishing Co. 1982.Google Scholar
13Shank, R. and Birnbaum, L. ‘Enhancing Intelligence’, in Khalfa, J. (ed.), What is Intelligence?, CUP, 1994.Google Scholar
14Makin, L. ‘Learner telesupport: language advising by e-mail’, in Esch, E. (ed.). Self Access and the Adult Learner, CILT, 1994.Google Scholar
15Roberts, C, Davies, E. and Jupp, T.Language and Discrimination, Longman, 1992.Google Scholar
16Esch, E. and King, A. ‘M. Dumas, Qui c'est ?: Documents authentiques et appropriation du role de destinataire par les apprenants’ in Mélanges, CRAPEL, Université Nancy II, No 21, 1993.Google Scholar