Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:21:30.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

English learning websites and digital resources from the perspective of Chinese university EFL practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Huizhong Shen
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia (email: [email protected])
Yifeng Yuan
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia (email: [email protected])
Robyn Ewing
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia (email: [email protected])

Abstract

English language learning (ELL) websites and digital resources have been recognized as an important source of linguistic and cultural knowledge for English as a foreign language (EFL) learners to explore. The up-to-date information carried by authentic materials is invaluable for learners to develop an understanding of the target language/culture. However, there appears to be a gap between what the designer intends and what the user wants. This paper investigates Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceptions of online English language websites and resources. The study focuses on a number of components of major language areas and skills in ELL websites, website materials, language users’ preferences, and website usability. A total of 1519 English academics from 139 universities across China completed the online survey, and 164 of them voluntarily participated in focus group interviews anonymously.

The empirical evidence of this study has highlighted that a pedagogically-oriented ELL website, targeting audiences with a variety of language proficiencies, was much liked by the Chinese EFL teachers. A preference was observed to see more current authentic language, examination-oriented English learning materials and tasks, and Eastern/non-Anglophone topics in the websites. In addition, it is found that website usability is another key factor that would impact ELL website popularity. A well-designed ELL website can effectively assist Chinese EFL learners to enhance their language competence and achieve optimal learning outcomes. This study provides a context-specific empirical base for innovative web-based EFL learning and teaching as well as website design and materials development in China. The proposed key features of a preferred ELL website may help better inform website designers, content writers and evaluators in their ELL website design/evaluation.

Type
Regular papers
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bax, S. (2003) CALL – past, present and future. System, 31(1): 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, K. (2003) Chinese Englishes: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradin, C. (1999) CALL issues: Instructional aspects of software evaluation. In: Egbert, J. and Hanson-Smith, E. (eds.), CALL Environments: Research, Practice and Critical Issues. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 159175.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1: 185216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2006) Negotiating the local in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26: 197218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (1998) Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1): 2234.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2009) The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, Focus Issue: 731753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinese College English Education and Supervisory Committee. (2007) College English Curriculum Requirements. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
CNNIC. (2013) The 32nd statistical report on China’s internet development. http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201307/t20130717_40664.htmGoogle Scholar
Comer, P. and Geissler, C. (1998) A methodology for software evaluation. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 444448.Google Scholar
Davies, G. (2001) New technologies and language learning: A suitable subject for research? In: Chambers, A. and Davies, G. (eds.), ICT and Language Learning: A European Perspective. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1327.Google Scholar
Feng, A. and Byram, M. (2002) Authenticity in College English textbooks – An intercultural perspective. RELC Journal, 33(2): 5884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, J. M. and Daigle, D. (2004) The educational software/website effectiveness survey. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(1): 6177.Google Scholar
He, D. Y. and Zhang, Q. Y. (2010) Native speaker norms and China English: From the perspective of learners and teachers in China. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4): 769789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. (2010) The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca. In: Trosborg, A. (ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 363387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P. (1988) An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation. CALICO Journal, 6(2): 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2006) Evaluating CALL software. In: Ducate, L. and Arnold, N. (eds.), Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in Foreign Language Teaching. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 313334.Google Scholar
Hughes, J., Mcavinia, C. and King, T. (2004) What really makes students like a web site? What are the implications for designing web-based language learning sites? ReCALL, 16(1): 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2006) Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1): 157181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y. (2002) China English: Issue, studies and features. Asian Englishes, 5: 423.Google Scholar
Karoulis, A., Demetriadis, S. and Pombortsis, A. (2006) Comparison of expert-based and empirical evaluation methodologies in the case of a CBL environment: The ‘Orestis’ experience. Computers & Education, 47(2): 172185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, M., Yuan, Y., Luke, A., Ewing, R. and Shen, H. (2012) The pedagogical, linguistic and content features of popular English language learning websites in China: A framework for analysis and design. Frontiers of Education in China, 7(4): 534552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laura, G. (1999) Evaluating net evaluators. Searcher, 7(2): 5766.Google Scholar
Levy, M. (2009) Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, Focus Issue: 769782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L. (2008) Li Lanqing’s talks about foreign language education. http://www.enbaike.cn/view/5697.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lim, K. M. and Shen, H. (2006) Integration of computers into an EFL reading classroom. ReCALL, 18(2): 212229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G. Z. (2005) The trend and challenge for teaching EFL at Taiwanese universities. RELC Journal, 36(2): 211221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G. Z., Liu, Z. H. and Hwang, G. J. (2011) Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56(1): 6579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T. (2001) World English and world Englishes: Trend, tensions, varieties, and standards. Language Teaching, 34: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pituch, K. A. and Lee, Y. K. (2006) The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2): 222244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, J. (1995) Human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2006) Introducing second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, H. and Yuan, Y. (2013) Reframing research and teaching for Chinese English: Perception, practice and paradigm. Foreign Language Learning: Theory and Practice, 1: 17.Google Scholar
Shield, L. and Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2006) Are language learning websites special? Towards a research agenda for discipline-specific usability. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(3): 349369.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. M. and Cohen, A. D. (2008) Observed learner behavior, reported use, and evaluation of a website for learning Spanish pragmatics. In: Bowles, M., Foote, R. and Perpiñán, S. (eds.), Second Language Acquisition and Research: Focus on Form and Function. Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 144157.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (2003) Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Vogel, T. (2001) Learning out of control: Some thoughts on the World Wide Web in learning and teaching foreign languages. In: Chambers, A. and Davies, G. (eds.), Information and Communications Technology: A European Perspective. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 155179.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. L., Bennett, L. T. and Oliver, K. M. (1997) Evaluation criteria and indicators of quality for internet resources. Educational Technology, 37(3): 5259.Google Scholar
Williams, M. and Burden, R. (1997) Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. T. C. and Chan, C. Y. (2008) Comprehensive evaluation criteria for English learning websites using expert validity surveys. Computers & Education, 51(1): 403422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B. and Shen, H. (2012) Predicting roles of linguistic confidence, integrative motivation and second language proficiency on cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1): 7282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Y. and Shen, H. (2002) Where is the technology-induced pedagogy? Snapshots from two multimedia EFL classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1): 3952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar