Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:55:13.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does computer-mediated conferencing really have a reduced social dimension?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Tricia Coverdale-Jones
Tricia Coverdale-Jones
Affiliation:
University of Lincolnshire and Humberside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper looks at computer-mediated conferencing (CMC) in the international arena, and considers whether culturally influenced behaviour has an effect on communication online. There is consideration of the indicative areas for cross-cultural misunderstanding taken from research into management communication, and also from research into gendered difference in posting styles on newslists and in ‘netiquette’ guidelines. The results from a small sample of questionnaires exemplify the cultural attitudes towards learning of a UK-based group of respondents. Trie question is raised of whether the ‘reduced social dimension’ of CMC allows participants in a conference to overcome social barriers, or whether the lack of social clues present in face-to-face interaction leads to greater confusion.

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 46 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brislin, R.W. and Yoshida, T. (eds.) (1994) Improving Intercultural Interactions: Modules for Cross-Cultural Training programs, Thousand Oaks: Sagep Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemy, L. (1994) Gender Differences in Text-Based Virtual Reality: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Conference on Women and Language, Berkeley Women and Language Group, Berkeley: WITS. http://www.eff.org/pub/Netculture/Genderjssues/cherny.articleGoogle Scholar
Coverdale-Jones, T. (1996) ‘Cross-Cultural Issues in CMC’, presentation at EUROCALL '96, Berzsenyi D´niel College, Szombathely, Hungary.Google Scholar
Coverdale-Jones, T. (1997) ‘Cross-Cultural Issues in CMC, Actes/Proceedings of the ITC Conference, Paris, January 1997, Journal du Multimedia (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Day, M. J. (1993) Networking: The Rhetoric of the New Writing Classroom. CMC RHETORIC file available in TESL-L archives.Google Scholar
Falk-Bano, K. (1996) Intercultural Conflicts in British-Hungarian and American-Hungarian International Organisations: SIETAR 96.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. R. (1994) ‘Intercultural Education at the University Level: Teacher-Student Interaction’. In Brislin and Yoshida (op. cit. 1994).Google Scholar
Hardy, V., Hodgson, V. and McConnell, D. (1993) Computer Conferencing: a new medium for investigating issues in gender and learning. Unpublished paper from Centre for the Study of Management, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (1994) ‘Politeness in Computer Culture: Why women thank and men flame’. In Bucholtz, M., Liang, A. C. Sutton L. and Hines C. (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Berkeley Women and Language Group, Berkeley: WITS.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (1996) ‘Posting in a Different Voice: Gender and Ethics in computer-mediated communication’. In Ess, C. (ed.), Philosophical Approaches to Computer-Mediated Communication, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1986) ‘Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning’, International Journal of Cultural Relations 10, 301–320.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. R. (ed.) (1991) Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
McCreary, E. and Brochet, M. (1991) ‘Collaboration in International Online Teams’. In Kaye {op. cit. 1991).Google Scholar
Mulvaney, B. M. (1994) ‘Gender Differences in Communication: An Intercultural Perspective’, Online Chronicle of Distance Education and Communication 6(1), November. http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Gender_issues/Google Scholar
Riel, M. M. and Levin, J. A. (1990) ‘Building electronic communities: successes and failures in computer networking’, Instructional Science 19, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, F. (1995) Riding the Waves of Culture, London: Nicholas Brearley Publishing.Google Scholar