Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2014
Anna Lydia Motto and John R. Clark in their recent article on Seneca's Hercules Furens sought to refute what was becoming the orthodox approach to the play — an approach based on Aristotelian poetics and the view that Hercules' madness is a natural phenomenon arising from a tragic flaw, usually identified as pride and ambition. A long list of scholars have contributed to this orthodox approach, which was most fully articulated by Jo-Ann Shelton, who saw Hercules' madness as ‘an internal, psychological development.’ In Shelton's very negative view of Hercules, ‘pride and ambition motivate [his] actions. And madness is an extension of his boastfulness.’ According to Shelton, ‘through [Juno's] words, we learn of, even as they are occurring, the progressive stages in the development of Hercules' pride, ambition and madness.’ This ‘naturalistic’ interpretation of Hercules' madness may appeal to twentieth century psychological critics, but it fails to account for the literary tradition behind the figure of Juno in Seneca's play, and in failing to do so it accepts at face value her allegations that Hercules is an ambitious, overreaching adventurer intent on storming the heavens. Motto and Clark rightly perceive that Hercules is ‘persecuted’ by Juno and persecuted ‘not for what he does,’ but ‘for what he is’ (that is, the bastard offspring of her husband's latest amour with a mortal woman) and that the play is not a story of ‘the abuse of strength and the growth of destructive pride,’ but ‘the story of deliberately oppressed and maligned greatness.’
1. Motto and Clark (1981).
2. See, for example, Haywood (1941/42); Waith (1962), 31–35; Mette (1966); Tobin (1966); Owen (1968); Galinsky (1972), 167–73; Rose (1979/80).
3. Shelton (1978), 25.
4. Ibid., 21.
5. Ibid., 21.
6. Motto and Clark (1981), 111.
7. Shelton (1978), 49.
8. Motto and Clark (1981), 111.
9. Marti (1945), 224.
10. Shelton (1978), 51.
11. See Frenzel (1914), 40–42, and Runchina (I960), 185–88.
12. See Bishop (1966) for the view that Juno’s vengeance is justified because ‘the hero has transgressed one of the great natural laws of the universe’ (216).
13. Motto and Clark (1981), 115.
14. Bishop (1966), passim.
15. Motto and Clark (1981), 109–111.
16. Shelton (1978), 63f.
17. Compare the earlier exchange at line 1263, where Amphitryon’s words perimes parentem may hint at thoughts of suicide but are taken in a different sense by Hercules.
18. Motto and Clark (1981), 108.
19. Ibid., 115.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.