Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:51:43.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘UNBOUNDED VIEWS’: INCOMPLETE EKPHRASIS AND THE VISUAL IMAGINATION IN VIRGIL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

Raymond Kania*
Affiliation:
Get access

Extract

Our imagination loves to be filled with an object or to grasp at anything that is too big for its capacity. We are flung into a pleasing astonishment at such unbounded views and feel a delightful stillness and amazement of the soul at the apprehension of them.

Joseph Addison, Essay 412

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barchiesi, A. (1997), ‘Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Martindale (below), 271--81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1998), ‘Ars and the Man: The Politics of Art in Virgil's Aeneid’, CP 93, 322-42.Google Scholar
Beck, D. (2007), ‘Ecphrasis, Interpretation, and Audience in Aeneid 1 and Odyssey 8’, AJP 128, 533-49.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1997), ‘Ghosts of Exile: Doubles and Nostalgia in Vergil's Parva Troia’, ClAnt 16, 8-33.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (1986), The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georics, and Aeneid of Virgil (Leiden).Google Scholar
Breed, B. (2006), Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues (London).Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1972), Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2006), Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Casali, S. (1995-1996), ‘Aeneas and the Doors of the Temple of Apollo’, CJ 91, 1-9.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2006), ‘The Making of the Shield: Inspiration and Repression in the Aeneid’, G&R 53, 185-204.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (1987), Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (1994), A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1988), ‘The Archaeology of the Temple to Juno in Carthage’, CP 83, 185-95.Google Scholar
Conington, J. (ed. and comm.) (1963), The Works of Virgil, rev. F. Haverfield and H. Nettleship (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1986), The Rhetoric of Imitation (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. (2011), ‘The Shield of Achilles: From Metalepsis to Mise en Abyme’, Ramus 40, 1-14.Google Scholar
Dickie, M.W. (1983), ‘Invidia Infelix: Vergil, Georgics 3.37-39’, ICS 8, 65-79.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, N.T. (tr.) (1970), Jorge Luis Borges: The Aleph and Other Stories, 1933–1969 (New York).Google Scholar
Dinter, M.T. (2013), ‘Intermediality in Latin Epic—en video quaecumque audita’, in Lovatt and Vout (below), 122-38.Google Scholar
DuBois, P. (1982), History, Rhetorical Description, and the Epic (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. (2013), The Captor's Image: Greek Culture in Roman Ecphrasis (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dyson, J.T. (1994), ‘Georgics 2.503-12: The Temple's Shadow’, Vergilius 40, 3-18.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2002), ‘Introduction: The Genres of Ekphrasis’, Ramus 31, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erren, M. (1985), Georgica: Einleitung, Praefatio, Text und übersetzung (2 vols.: Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Faber, R. (2000), ‘Vergil's Shield of Aeneas (Aeneid 8. 617-731) and the Shield of Heracles’, Mnemosyne 53, 49-57.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991), Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic (Oxford).Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2012), ‘Art, Aesthetics, and the Hero in Vergil's Aeneid’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R.M. (eds.), Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity (Leiden), 285-314.Google Scholar
Feeney, D.C. (1991), The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition (Oxford).Google Scholar
Feeney, D.C. (2007), Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley and Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Fisher, R.S. (1982), ‘Conon and the Poet: A Solution to Eclogue III. 40-2’, Latomus 41, 803-14.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1984), ‘Aeneas, Daedalus and the Labyrinth’, Arethusa 17, 51-65.Google Scholar
Fowler, D.P. (1990), ‘Deviant Focalisation in Virgil's Aeneid’, PCPS 36, 42-63.Google Scholar
Fowler, D.P. (1991), ‘Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis’, JRS 81, 25-35.Google Scholar
Francis, J.A. (2009), ‘Metal Maidens, Achilles’ Shield, and Pandora: The Beginnings of “Ekphrasis”’, AJP 130, 1-23.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2007), ‘What is Ekphrasis For?’, CP 102, 1-19.Google Scholar
Gransden, K.W. (1976), Virgil, Aeneid Book VIII (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gurval, R.A. (1995), Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1986), Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1992), ‘Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (London), 59-82.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993), The Epic Sucessors of Virgil (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1997), ‘Closure in Latin Epic’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure (Princeton), 139-62.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2005), ‘Time in Lucretius and the Augustan Poets: Freedom and Innovation’, in Schwindt (below), 19-42.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. (2001), ‘Picturing the Future: The Proleptic Ekphrasis from Homer to Vergil’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas and the Classics (Oxford), 70-92.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. (2006), ‘The Epic and the Monuments: Interactions between Virgil's Aeneid and the Augustan Building Program’, in Clarke, M.J., Currie, B.G.F., and Lyne, R.O.A.M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils (Oxford), 159-84.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. (2007), Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Heffernan, J. (1993), Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery (Chicago).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2008), ‘Virgil's Third Eclogue: How Do You Keep an Idiot in Suspense?’, in Volk, K. (ed.), Vergil's Eclogues (New York/Oxford), 125-54.Google Scholar
Hollander, J. (1988), ‘The Poetics of Ekphrasis’, Word and Image 4, 209-19.Google Scholar
Johnson, W.R. (1976), Darkness Visible: A Study of Virgil's Aeneid (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Jones, F. (2011), Virgil's Garden: The Nature of Bucolic Space (London).Google Scholar
Kania, R. (2016), Virgil's Eclogues and the Art of Fiction: A Study of the Poetic Imagination (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Keuls, E. (1974), The Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Antiquity (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2013), ‘Virgil's Augustan Temples: Image and Intertext in the Aeneid’, JRS 103, 65-87.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1998), ‘Vergil Announcing the Aeneid: On Georg. 3.1-48’, in Stahl (below), 1-20.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1993), ‘Sounding Out Ecphrasis: Art and Text in Catullus 64’, JRS 83, 18-30.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1996), ‘Vt figura poesis: Writing Art and the Art of Writing in Augustan Poetry’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture (Cambridge), 75-102.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (1999), ‘Viewing the Spectacula of Aeneid 6’, in Perkell, C. (ed.), Reading Vergil's Aeneid (Norman OK), 111-27.Google Scholar
Lessing, G.E. (1853), Laocoon: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, tr. Beasley, E.C. (London).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S.H. (1990), ‘Simile and Ecphrasis in Homer and Virgil: The Poet as Craftsman and Choreographer’, Vergilius 36, 7-30.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. (2013), The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender, and Narrative in Ancient Epic (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.) (2013), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and its Reception (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (1993), ‘The Pictures on Juno's Temple in the Aeneid’, CW 87, 37-49.Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1978), Ciris: A Poem Attributed to Vergil (New York/Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1987), Further Voices in Virgil's Aeneid (Oxford).Google Scholar
Mack, S. (1978), Patterns of Time in Vergil (Hamden CT).Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge).Google Scholar
McKay, A.G. (1998), ‘Non Enarrabile Textum? The Shield of Aeneas and the Triple Triumph of 29 B.C.’, in Stahl (below), 199-222.Google Scholar
Meban, D. (2008), ‘Temple Building, Primus Language, and the Proem to Virgil's Third Georgic’, CP 103, 150-74.Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. (2009), Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994), Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation (Chicago).Google Scholar
Mitchell-Boyask, R.N. (1996), ‘Sine Fine: Vergil's Masterplot’, AJP 117, 289-307.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999), Patterns of Redemption in Virgil's Georgics (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. (ed. and comm.) (1994), Virgil: Georgics (Oxford).Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2004), ‘From Didactic to Epic: Georgics 2.458-3.48’, in Gale, M. (ed.), Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality (Swansea), 75-107.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2005), ‘Patterns of Time in Vergil: The Aeneid and the Aetia of Callimachus’, in Schwindt (below), 71-84.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.J. (1990), Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid (Princeton).Google Scholar
Page, T.E. (ed. and comm.) (1965), P. Vergili Maronis Bucolica et Georgica (London).Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T.D. (1999), ‘Eros Pastoral and Profane: On Love in Virgil's Eclogues’, in Braund, S.M. and Mayer, G. (eds.), Amor, Roma: Love and Latin Literature (Cambridge), 44-59.Google Scholar
Perkell, C.G. (1996), ‘The Dying Gallus and the Design of Eclogue 10’, CP 91, 128-40.Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011), Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1962), The Art of Vergil, tr. Seligson, G. (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. (1970), Virgil's Pastoral Art (Princeton).Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. (1998), Virgil's Epic Designs (New Haven CT).Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. (2001), ‘The Ambiguity of Art in Virgil's Aeneid’, PAPHS 145, 162-83.Google Scholar
Quenemoen, C.K. (2006), ‘The Portico of the Danaids: A New Reconstruction’, AJA 110, 229-50.Google Scholar
Reed, J.D. (2007), Virgil's Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid (Princeton).Google Scholar
Rogerson, A. (2002), ‘Dazzling Likeness: Seeing Ekphrasis in Aeneid 10’, Ramus 31, 51-72.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2004), Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Rumpf, L. (1996), Extremus Labor: Vergils 10 Ekloge und die Poetik der Bucolica (Gottingen).Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. (ed. and tr.) (2001), Quintilian, The Orator's Education Vol 3: Books 6-8 (Cambridge MA/London).Google Scholar
Saunders, T. (2008), Bucolic Ecology: Virgil's Eclogues and the Environmental Literary Tradition (London).Google Scholar
Schwindt, J.P. (ed.) (2005), La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1967), ‘Vergil's caelatum opus: An Interpretation of the Third Eclogue’, AJP 88, 279-308.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1981), ‘Art and the Hero: Participation, Detachment, and Narrative Point of View in Aeneid I’, Arethusa 14, 67-83.Google Scholar
Smith, R.A. (2005), The Primacy of Vision in Virgil's Aeneid (Austin TX).Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013), ‘Ekphrasis at the Forge and the Forging of Ekphrasis: The “Shield of Achilles” in Graeco-Roman Word and Image’, Word and Image 29, 157-91.Google Scholar
Stahl, H. (ed.) (1998), Virgil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context (London).Google Scholar
Staley, G.A. (2001-2002), ‘Vergil's Daedalus’, CO 79, 137-43.Google Scholar
Syed, Y. (2005), Virgil's Aeneid and the Roman Self (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1980), ‘The Shield of Achilles within the Iliad’, G&R 27, 1-21.Google Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (1997), ‘Closure: The Book of Virgil’, in Martindale (above), 155-65.Google Scholar
Thomas, R.F. (ed. and comm.) (1988), Virgil: Georgics (2 vols: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Thomas, R.F. (1999), Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius (Oxford).Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009), Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice (Farnham).Google Scholar
West, D.A. (1990), ‘Cernere Erat: The Shield of Aeneas’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid (Oxford/New York), 295-304.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L.P. (1969), The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey (London).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L.P. (2008), ‘Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic’, in Volk, K. (ed.), Vergil's Georgics (New York/Oxford), 182-88.Google Scholar
Wormell, D.E.W. (1960), ‘The Riddles in Virgil's Third Eclogue’, CQ 10, 29-32.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988), The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. Shapiro, A. (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F.I. (2013), ‘Figure: Ekphrasis’, G&R 60, 17-31.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. (1994), ‘Looking Backward: Past and Present in the Late Roman Republic’, Pegasus 37, 20-32.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. (1997), ‘Rome and its Traditions’, in Martindale (above), 188-203.Google Scholar