Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:57:12.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SAILING TOGETHER: THE AGONISTIC CONSTRUCTION OF SISTERHOOD IN SOPHOCLES’ ANTIGONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2021

Valentina Moro
Valentina Moro*
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, the meaning of kinship in Sophocles’ Theban plays has raised a great deal of interest in critical interpretations in the fields of philosophy, political theory, and psychoanalysis. From the 1970s onward, Antigone in particular has also become a staple of feminist theory, both as a philosophical and political gesture contra Hegel and Lacan, but also in connection with post-structuralism. Conversely, the topic of kinship in Athenian drama has attracted comparatively little attention from classical philologists. As a consequence, theorists have often been more inclined to discuss the theme with reference to modern conceptual frameworks, rather than to Sophocles’ language itself.

Type
III. Sisterhood
Information
Ramus , Volume 50 , Special Issue 1-2: In Terms of Athens , December 2021 , pp. 109 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Some preliminary work included in this essay was presented at the 2019 APSA Meeting. I owe many thanks to Johanna Hanink and Demetra Kasimis for inviting me to participate in this volume of Ramus and to Lyndsay Coo for the fruitful exchange we had while writing our pieces for this volume. Ultimately, I owe many thanks to Bonnie Honig and, again, to Johanna for a years-long conversation on Sophocles and his female characters, which started in 2016 at Brown University and keeps inspiring my work. Unless otherwise indicated all translations in this article are mine.

References

Benveniste, E. (1969), Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes (2 vols: Paris).Google Scholar
Bruciati, A., and Angle, M. (2019), Il mito di Niobe. E dimmi che non vuoi morire (Milan).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2000), Antigone's Claim (New York).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2017), ‘Breaks in the Bond: Reflections on Kinship Trouble’, UCL Housman Lecture (London). www.ucl.ac.uk/classics/sites/classics/files/housman_butler_2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Coo, L. (2013), ‘A Tale of Two Sisters: Studies in Sophocles’ Tereus’, TAPhA 143, 349–84.Google Scholar
Coo, L. (2020), ‘Greek Tragedy and the Theatre of Sisterhood’, in Finglass, P.J. and Coo, L. (eds), Female Characters in Fragmentary Greek Tragedy (Cambridge), 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelstein, S. (2011), ‘Sibling Logic; or, Antigone Again’, Transactions of the Modern Language Association of America CXXVI/1, 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornaro, S. (2019), ‘Le ragioni di Crisotemi’, in Farnetti, M. and Ortu, G. (eds), L'eredità di Antigone. Sorelle e sorellanza nelle letterature, nel teatro, nelle arti e nella politica (Florence), 37–74.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2006), ‘Antigone and the Politics of Sisterhood’, in Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (eds), Laughing with Medusa. Classical Myth and Feminist Thought (New York), 141–61.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1999), Sophocles. Antigone (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2011), ‘Ismene's Forced Choice: Sacrifice and Sorority in Sophocles’ Antigone’, Arethusa 44, 29–68.Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2013), Antigone, Interrupted (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jebb, R. (ed. and tr.) (1966), The Antigone of Sophocles (Cambridge) [orig. publ. 1891].Google Scholar
Leonard, M. (2005), Athens in Paris. Ancient Greece and the Political in Post-War French Thought (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, V.M. (2015), ‘Gendered Speech in Sophocles’ Electra’, Phoenix 69, 217–41.10.7834/phoenix.69.3-4.0217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loraux, N. (2018), ‘The “Beautiful Death” from Homer to Democratic Athens’, tr. M. Pritchard, Arethusa 51, 73–89.10.1353/are.2018.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, L.K. (1999), Spoken like a Woman. Speech and Gender in Athenian Drama (Princeton, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. (2017), ‘Images and Effects of Incest in Antigone’, in Stuttard (2017), 47–61.Google Scholar
Moro, V. (2020), ‘Antigone: Staging Sorority and Conspiracy’, in Carpenter, A. and Wiseman, R. (eds), Portraits of Integrity (London), 36–41.Google Scholar
Roisman, H.M. (2017), ‘The Two Sisters’, in Stuttard (2017), 63–77.Google Scholar
Sjoholm, C. (2004), The Antigone Complex: Ethics and the Invention of Feminine Desire (Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
Söderbäck, F. (ed.) (2010), Feminist Readings of Antigone (Albany, NY).Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (1995), ‘The Language of Athenian Women’, Lo Spettacolo delle Voci 2, 61–85.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1996), Antigones (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Stuttard, D. (ed.) (2017), Looking at Antigone (London).Google Scholar
Susanetti, D. (ed. and tr.) (2012), Sofocle: Antigone (Rome).Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2005), ‘Beyond Sexual Difference: Becoming-Woman in Euripides’ Bacchae’, in Pedrick, V. and Oberhelman, S.M. (eds), The Soul of Tragedy. Essays on Athenian Drama (Chicago, IL), 137–54.Google Scholar