Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:15:52.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPRESENTING THE DEMOS: ADAPTING INSIGHTS FROM THE CONSTRUCTIVIST TURN IN POLITICAL REPRESENTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2021

Matt Simonton
Matt Simonton*
Affiliation:
Arizona State [email protected]
Get access

Extract

One of the commonest clichés in the study of ancient and modern democracy is the claim that the former is ‘direct’, the latter ‘representative’. A few scholars have recently explored areas in which the Classical Athenian democracy had representative features, particularly the magistracies. These studies continue, however, to understand ‘political representation’ according to the definition proposed by the political scientist Hanna Pitkin, that is, as ‘acting [on the part of the political representative] in the interest of the represented, in a manner responsive to them’. In this paper I introduce the insights of the recent ‘constructivist turn’ in studies of political representation to the analysis of Athenian politics in the hope of suggesting, in what will necessarily be a brief and incomplete exercise, how productive this exciting new paradigm can be for understanding the dynamics of ancient democracy. I first lay out the basic tenets of constructivist representation, particularly the notion of the ‘representative claim’ as developed by the political theorist Michael Saward, and argue for their suitability for studying ancient Greek history and political thought. Next, I adapt the model of the representative claim to two episodes of Athenian democratic deliberation, showing how it illuminates processes of demotic will- and identity-formation. I conclude by briefly underscoring how approaching Athenian politics in terms of constructivist notions of representation restores an aesthetic dimension to ancient democratic debate, one that allows us to compare more productively the ‘demos’ of symbouleutic oratory with its counterparts in poetry, sculpture, and other media, namely as a represented object fashioned for creative and rhetorical purposes.

Type
IV. The Body Politic
Information
Ramus , Volume 50 , Special Issue 1-2: In Terms of Athens , December 2021 , pp. 129 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the editors, Johanna Hanink and Demetra Kasimis, for inviting me to participate in this special volume of Ramus; I have received much useful feedback from both of them. An early version of this piece was presented at the University of Edinburgh in March of 2019; there I benefited greatly from the audience members and in particular from many friendly and productive conversations with Mirko Canevaro. Denise Demetriou, Denver Graninger, John W.I. Lee, and Jeremy Labuff also read and provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This article is dedicated to Josh Ober, whose influence on it will be apparent below, in honor of fifteen years of scholarship, mentoring, and friendship.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, G. (2018), The Realness of Things Past (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J.A. (2000), ‘Cleon's Hidden Appeals (Thucydides 3.37–40)’, CQ 50, 45–62.
Ankersmit, F. (2002), Political Representation (Stanford).Google Scholar
Bers, V. (1985), ‘Dikastic Thorubos‘, in Cartledge, P.A. and Harvey, F. (eds), CRUX: Essays Presented to G.E.M. de Ste. Croix on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Exeter), 1–15.Google Scholar
Blanshard, A.J.L. (2004a), ‘What Counts as the Demos? Some Notes on the Relationship between the Jury and “The People” in Classical Athens’, Phoenix 58, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanshard, A.J.L. (2004b), ‘Depicting Democracy: An Exploration of Art and Text in the Law of Eukrates’, JHS 124, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouricius, T. (2013), ‘Democracy through Multi-body Sortition: Athenian Lessons for the Modern Day’, Journal of Public Deliberation 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
Bremner, S. (2020), ‘The Rhetoric of Athenian Identity in Demosthenes’ Early Assembly Speeches’, GRBS 60, 544–73.Google Scholar
Brito Vieira, M. (ed.) (2017), Reclaiming Representation: Contemporary Advances in the Theory of Political Representation (New York/London).10.4324/9781315681696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammack, D. (2021), ‘Deliberation and Discussion in Classical Athens’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 29(2), 135–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, M. (2018), ‘Majority Rule vs. Consensus: The Practice of Democratic Deliberation in the Greek Poleis‘, in Canevaro, M., Erskine, A., Gray, B., and Ober, J. (eds), Ancient Greek History and Contemporary Social Science, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 9 (Edinburgh), 101–56.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (2005), The People (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Disch, L. (2015), ‘The “Constructivist Turn” in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead End?’, Constellations 22, 487–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, L., van de Sande, M., and Urbinati, N. (eds) (2019), The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation (Edinburgh).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, E. (2017), ‘Aristophanes’ Cleon and Post-Peloponnesian War Athenians: Denunciations in Thucydides’, Histos Supplement 6, 129–52.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (2010), Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America (Durham, NC).Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2008), ‘Emotional Appeals in the Mytilenean Debate’, Syllecta Classica 19, 115–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowacki, K. (2003), ‘A Personification of Demos on a New Attic document Relief’, Hesperia 72, 447–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, J. (2003), The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, C. (New York) [orig. publ. 1788].Google Scholar
Kallet, L. (2003), ‘Dêmos Tyrannos: Wealth, Power, and Economic Patronage’, in Morgan, K. (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin), 25–58.Google Scholar
Landauer, M. (2019) Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landemore, H. (2020), Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton).Google Scholar
Lane, M. (2020), ‘The Idea of Accountable Office in Ancient Greece and Beyond’, Philosophy 95, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, C. (1995), Attic Document Reliefs: Art and Politics in Ancient Athens (Oxford).Google Scholar
MacLeod, C.W. (1978), ‘Reason and Necessity: Thucydides III 9–14, 37–48’, JHS 98, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003), ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97, 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerschmidt, W. (2003), PROSOPOPOIIA: Personifikationen politischen Charakters in spätklassischer und hellenistischer Kunst (Cologne).Google Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2014), The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation (Stanford).Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004), Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J. (1989), Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J. (1996), ‘The Athenian Revolution of 508/7 B.C.: Violence, Authority, and the Origins of Democracy’, in Ober, J. (ed.), The Athenian Revolution (Princeton), 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J. (2007), ‘“I Besieged that Man”: Democracy's Revolutionary Start’, in Raaflaub, K.A., Ober, J., and Wallace, R.W. (eds), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J., and Hedrick, C. (eds) (1996), Dêmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern (Princeton).Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. (1986), From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Representation (Berkeley/Los Angeles).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeld, A. (2006), ‘Towards a General Theory of Political Representation’, Journal of Politics 68, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, P. (2001), Demos Pyknites: Untersuchungen zur Darstellung des Demos in der Alten Komödie (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E.W. (2011), Democracy Beyond Athens: Popular Government in the Greek Classical Age (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samons, L.J. (2004), What's Wrong with Democracy? From Athenian Practice to Modern Worship (Berkeley/Los Angeles).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, M (2010), The Representative Claim (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shear, J.L. (2011), Polis and Revolution: Responding to Oligarchy in Classical Athens (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. (2013), Social Memory in Athenian Public Discourse (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Tacon, J. (2001), ‘Ecclesiastic Thorubos: Interventions, Interruptions, and Popular Involvement in the Athenian Assembly’, G&R 48, 173–92.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006), Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, A. (2003), ‘Addresses to the Jury in the Attic Orators’, AJP 124, 537–55.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2010), ‘Traditional Political Culture and the People's Role in the Roman Republic’, Historia 59, 282–302.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (1996), Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens (Ithaca).CrossRefGoogle Scholar