Adams, J.N. (1982), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Agapitos, P.A. (1998), ‘Seneca's Thyestes and the Poetics of Multiple Transgression’, Hellenica 48, 231-53.Google Scholar

Augoustakis, A. (2015), ‘Statius and Senecan Drama’, in Dominik, W.J., Newlands, C.E. and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Statius (Leiden), 377-92.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (2000), ‘Seneca and Chaucer’, in Harrison (2000), 151-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahl, F. (2008), Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca's Oedipus (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar

Allendorf, T.S. (2013), ‘The Poetics of Uncertainty in Senecan Drama’, MD 71, 103-44.Google Scholar

Alexopoulou, M. (2009), The Theme of Returning Home in Ancient Greek Literature: The Nostos of the Epic Heroes (Lewiston NY).Google Scholar

Anderson, W.S. (1961), ‘ Venusina lucerna: The Horatian Model for Juvenal’, TAPA 52, 1-12 (= Anderson [1982], 103-14).Google Scholar

Anderson, W.S. (1962), ‘The Programs of Juvenal's Later Books’, CP 57, 145-60 (= Anderson [1982], 277-92).Google Scholar

Anderson, W.S. (1982), Essays on Roman Satire (Princeton).Google Scholar

Anliker, K. (1960), Prologe und Akteinleitung in Senecas Tragödien (Bern/Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1983), ‘L’ Ars poetica di Orazio e la tragedia romana arcaica’, QCTC 1, 67-93.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1996), ‘Lacrimas lacrimis miscere iuvat: Il chorus Iliadum nell’ed. di Seneca’, in Castagna (1996), 131-45.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (2001), ‘La morale della fabula. Su alcuni problemi del teatro di Seneca’, in Fedeli, P. (ed.), Scienza, cultura, morale in Seneca (Bari), 87-113.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (1997), Onomata allotria. Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Audano, S. (1998), ‘Apollo nel secondo coro dell’Agamennone (vv. 322-339)’, Paideia 53, 3-8.Google Scholar

Aygon, J.-P. (2010), ‘Épopée et tragédie dans l’Agamemnon de Sénèque’, in Baratin, M., Lévy, C., Utard, R. and Videau, A. (eds.), Stylus: la parole dans ses formes. Mélanges en l'honneur du professeur Jacqueline Dangel (Paris), 331-45.Google Scholar

Bacquet, P. (1964), ‘L'Imitation de Sénèque dans “Gorbodoc” de Sackville et Norton’, in Jacquot (1964b), 153-74.Google Scholar

Baertschi, A.M. (2010), ‘Drama and Epic Narrative: The Test Case of Messenger Speech in Seneca's Agamemnon ’, in Gildenhard, I. and Revermann, M. (eds.), Beyond the Fifth Century: Interactions with Greek Tragedy from the Fourth Century BCE to the Middle Ages (Berlin/New York), 249-68.Google Scholar

Baertschi, A.M. (2015), ‘Epic Elements in Senecan Tragedy’, in Harrison (2015), 171-95.Google Scholar

Baines, V. (2003), ‘Umbricius’ Bellum Ciuile: Juvenal, Satire 3’, G&R 50, 220-37.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination, tr. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (Austin).Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1988), Seneca: le Fenicie (Venice).Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993), ‘Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides ’, HSCP 95, 333-65.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (ed.) (2005), Ovidio Metamorfosi volume I (libri I-II) (Milan).Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Cucchiarelli, A. (2005), ‘Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-referential Symbol’, in Freudenburg (2005), 207-23.Google Scholar

Barrenechea, F. (2010), ‘Didactic Aggressions in the Nile Excursus of Lucan's Bellum Civile ’, AJP 131, 259-84.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2006), The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2015), Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural (Chicago).Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (ed.) (2017), Lucius Annaeus Seneca: The Complete Tragedies. 2 vols. (Chicago).Google Scholar

Basile, A. (2012), ‘Il mito di Atteone tra Ovidio e Seneca tragico’, Vichiana 14, 222-34.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2007), The Roman Triumph (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar

Beare, W. (1951), The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic (Cambridge, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaudin, J. (2010), ‘Sophocle, modèle de Robert Garnier’, Seizième Siècle 6, 33-38.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E.S. (2000), Murder Among Friends: Violation of Philia in Greek Tragedy (Oxford/New York).Google Scholar

Beringer, A.L.P. (1997), Foedera Naturae: A Discussion of Natural Limits in Selected Odes of Horace and Seneca's Medea (MA Thesis, University of Victoria BC).Google Scholar

Berti, E. (2007), Scholasticorum studia: Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale (Pisa).Google Scholar

Biet, C. (1994), Oedipe en monarchie: tragédie et théorie juridique à l’âge classique (Paris).Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. (ed. and tr.) (1999), Seneca, Hercules Furens (Leiden).Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. and Guex, S. (eds. and tr.) (2002), Sénèque: Hercule furieux (Bern).Google Scholar

Biondi, G.G. (1984), Il nefas argonautico: mythos e logos nella Medea di Seneca (Bologna).Google Scholar

Biondi, G.G. and Traina, A. (eds. and tr.) (1989), L.A. Seneca, Medea (Milano).Google Scholar

Bishop, J.D. (1966), ‘Seneca's Hercules Furens: Tragedy from modus vitae ’, C&M 27, 216-24.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1997), The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar

Bloomer, W.M. (1997), Latinity and Literary Society at Rome (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Bocchi, G. (2004), ‘Dal banchetto di Tieste alla cena di Trimalchione: dissociazione del monstrum tra Seneca, Persio e Petronio’, in Valvo, A. and Manzoni, G.E. (eds.), Analecta Brixiana: contribute dell'Istituto di filologia e storia dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano), 233-54.Google Scholar

Bocciolini Palagi, L. (1998), ‘Orfeo nelle tragedie di Seneca: ambivalenza e funzionalità di un mito’, Paideia 53, 27-48.Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed.) (1983a), Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama (Berwick, Victoria).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (1983b), ‘Hic epulis locus: The Tragic Worlds of Seneca's Agamemnon and Thyestes’, in Boyle (1983a), 199-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (1987), Seneca's Phaedra (Leeds).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (1994), Seneca's Troades (Leeds).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (1995), ‘Martialis Redivivus: Evaluating the Unexpected Classic’, Ramus 24, 82-101.Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (1997), Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition (London).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (2006), An Introduction to Roman Tragedy (London/New York).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (2008), Octavia Attributed to Seneca (Oxford).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (2011), Seneca: Oedipus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (2014), Seneca: Medea (Oxford).Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (ed. and tr.) (2017), Seneca: Thyestes (Oxford).Google Scholar

Braden, G. (1985), Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger's Privilege (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar

Bramble, J.C. (1974), Persius and the Programmatic Satire: A Study in Form and Imagery (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Braun, W. (1867), ‘Der Oedipus des Seneca in seinen Beziehungen zu den gleichnamigen Stücken des Sophokles und Euripides und zu Statius’ Thebais ’, RhM 22, 245-75.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (1988), Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal's Third Book of Satires (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (1989a), Satire and Society in Ancient Rome (Exeter).Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (1989b), ‘City and Country in Roman Satire’, in Braund (1989a), 23-47.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (1992), Roman Verse Satire Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 23 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (ed.) (1996), Juvenal: Satires Book I (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (2006), ‘A Tale of Two Cities: Statius, Thebes, and Rome’, Phoenix 60, 259-73.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. (2016), Seneca: Oedipus (London/New York).Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. and James, P. (1998), ‘ Quasi Homo: Distortion and Contortion in Seneca's Apocolo-cyntosis ’, Arethusa 31, 285-311.Google Scholar

Braund, S.M. and Raschke, W. (2002), ‘Satiric Grotesques in Public and Private: Juvenal, Dr. Frankenstein, Raymond Chandler and Absolutely Fabulous’, G&R 49, 62-84.Google Scholar

Brewer, E.C. (ed.) (1898), Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, Giving the Derivation, Source, or Origin of Common Phrases, Allusions, and Words That Have a Tale to Tell (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Brink, C.O. (ed.) (1971), Horace on Poetry II: The Ars Poetica (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Brownlee, K. (1984), ‘Phaeton's Fall and Dante's Ascent’, Dante Studies 102, 135-44.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1971), ‘Epikurs Triumph des Geistes’, Hermes 99, 303-23.Google Scholar

Buckley, E. (2013), ‘Senecan Tragedy’, in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M.T. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age (Chichester), 204-24.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1966), ‘Greek Tragedy and Sacrificial Ritual’, GRBS 7, 87-121.Google Scholar

Busch, A. (2007), ‘ Versane Natura Est? Natural and Linguistic Instability in the Extispicium and Self-Blinding of Seneca's Oedipus ’, CJ 102, 225-67.Google Scholar

Bushnell, R.W. (ed.) (2005), A Companion to Tragedy (Malden MA).Google Scholar

Calder, W.M. (1970), ‘Originality in Seneca's Troades ’, CP 65, 75-82.Google Scholar

Calder, W.M. (1975), ‘The Size of the Chorus in Seneca's Agamemnon ’, CP 70, 32-35.Google Scholar

Calder, W.M. (1976-77). ‘Seneca: Tragedian of Imperial Rome’, CJ 72, 1-11.Google Scholar

Cancik, H. (1967), Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales (Hildesheim).Google Scholar

Canter, H.V. (1925), Rhetorical Elements in the Tragedies of Seneca (Urbana).Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2011), ‘The Bellum Civile as an Anti-Aeneid ’, in Asso, P. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Lucan (Leiden), 81-110.Google Scholar

Castagna, L. (1996), Nove studi sui cori tragici di Seneca (Milano).Google Scholar

Caston, R.R. (2012), The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy (Oxford).Google Scholar

Caviglia, F. (1996), ‘I cori dell’Oedipus di Seneca’, in Castagna (1996), 87-103.Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (ed.) (1972-98), Varron, Satires ménippées: édition, traduction et commentaire (Rome).Google Scholar

Charlton, H.B. (1946), The Senecan Tradition in Renaissance Tragedy (Folcroft PA).Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, P. (2014), The War with God: Theomachy in Roman Imperial Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar

Chaumartin, F.-R. (1999), Sénèque: Tragédies, Tome 2. (Paris).Google Scholar

Christes, J. (2001), ‘Lucilius und das Epos’, in Manuwald (2001a), 51-62.Google Scholar

Churchill, C. (tr.) (1995), Seneca: Thyestes (London).Google Scholar

Churchill, C. (1998), Plays: 3 (including Thyestes) (London).Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (1968), ‘Motivi di polemica letteraria negli epigrammi di Marziale’, DArch 2, 259-301.Google Scholar

Cloud, D. (1989), ‘The Client-Patron Relationship: Emblem and Reality in Juvenal's First Book’, in Wallace-Hadrill, A. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society (London), 205-18.Google Scholar

Coffey, M. (1976), Roman Satire (London).Google Scholar

Coffey, M. (1996), ‘Generic Impropriety in the High Style: Satirical Themes in Seneca and Lucan’, in Klodt, C. (ed.), Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag (Hildes-heim), 81-93.Google Scholar

Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (eds.) (1990), Seneca: Phaedra (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Compton-Engle, G. (2015), Costume in the Comedies of Aristophanes (Cambridge/New York).Google Scholar

Connors, C. (2005), ‘Epic Allusion in Roman Satire’, in Freudenburg (2005), 123-45.Google Scholar

Conte, G.-B. (1986), The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar

Conte, G.-B. (1994), Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Costa, C.D.N. (ed.) (1973), Seneca: Medea (Oxford).Google Scholar

Costa, C.D.N. (ed.) (1974), Seneca (London).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1962), ‘Parody and Literary Allusion in Menippean Satire’, Philologus 106, 86-100.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1980), A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal (London).Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2009), ‘Starring Nero as Nero: Poetry, Role–Playing and Identity in Juvenal 8.215-21’, Mnemosyne 62, 76-89.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2011), ‘Lucan's Thunder-box: Scatology, Epic and Satire in Suetonius’ Vita Lucani ’, HSCP 106, 301-13.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2013), ‘Fear and Loathing in Lucretius: Latent Tragedy and Anti-Allusion in DRN 3’, in Papanghelis, Harrison and Frangoulidis (2013), 113-33.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2014), ‘Fingering Cestos: Martial's Catullus’ Callimachus’, in Augoustakis, Antony (ed.) Flavian Poetry and its Greek Past (Leiden), 345-71.Google Scholar

Crébillon, M. de P.J. (1912), ‘Atrée et Thyeste’, in Ouvres de Crébillon. Tome Premier (Paris), 91-180.Google Scholar

Critelli, M.G. (1999), ‘Ideologia e simbologia della natura nella Phaedra di Seneca’, RCCM 41, 233-43.Google Scholar

Crocetti, C.G. (1973), Giambattista Cinthio Giraldi: Scritti critici (Milan).Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2003), ‘The Dolphins of Dionysus’, in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.). Poetry, Theory, Praxis: The Social Life of Myth, Word and Image in Ancient Greece: Essays in Honour of vc William J. Slater (Oxford), 69-98.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. (2001), La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra Epodi e Sermones (Pisa).Google Scholar

Cunliffe, J.W. (1893), The Influence of Seneca on Elizabethan Tragedy (London).Google Scholar

Curley, D. (1997), ‘Ovid, Met. 6.640: A Dialogue Between Mother and Son’, CQ 47, 320-22.Google Scholar

Curley, D. (2013), Tragedy in Ovid (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Curley, T.F. (1986), The Nature of Senecan Drama (Rome).Google Scholar

Curran, L.C. (1970), ‘Nature, Convention, and Obscenity in Horace, Satires 1.2’, Arion 9, 220-45.Google Scholar

Damschen, G., and Heil, A. (eds.) (2014), Brill's Companion to Seneca (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar

Dangel, J. (1999), ‘Orphée sous le regard de Virgile, Ovide et Sénèque: trois arts poétiques’, REL 77, 87-117.Google Scholar

Davis, G. (1983), The Death of Procris: “Amor” and the Hunt in Ovid's Metamorphoses (Rome).Google Scholar

Davis, G. (1991), Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse (Berkeley).Google Scholar

Davis, P.J. (1989), ‘The Chorus in Seneca's Thyestes ’, CQ 39, 421-35.Google Scholar

Davis, P.J. (1991), ‘Fate and Human Responsibility in Seneca's Oedipus ’, Latomus 50, 150-63.Google Scholar

Davis, P.J. (1993), Shifting Song: The Chorus in Seneca's Tragedies (Hildesheim).Google Scholar

Davis, P.J. (2003), Seneca: Thyestes. Duckworth Companions to Greek and Roman Tragedy (London).Google Scholar

Dawe, R.D. (2006), Sophocles. Oedipus Rex (rev. ed., Cambridge).Google Scholar

Day, H.J.M. (2013), Lucan and the Sublime (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Degl'Innocenti Pierini, R. (1992), ‘ aurea mediocritas: la morale oraziana nei cori delle tragedie di Seneca’, QCTC 10, 155-71.Google Scholar

Degl'Innocenti Pierini, R. (2002), ‘ spirat tragicum satis … Note al Tereus di Accio, tra filologia e storia della lingua’, Paideia 57, 85-98.Google Scholar

Degl'Innocenti Pierini, R. (2013), ‘Medea e Canidia, Canidia e Medea: percorsi intertestuali tra Orazio giambico e Seneca tragico’, SIFC 106, 258-66.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1994), Difference and Repetition (New York).Google Scholar

Depew, M., and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar

Deroux, C. (ed.) (1989), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History V (Bruxelles).Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1981), Dissemination (Chicago).Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1987), The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond (Chicago).Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1988), ‘Signature Event Context’, Limited Inc (Evanston), 1-23.Google Scholar

Dillon, S. (2006), ‘Women on the Column of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius and the Visual Language of Victory’, in Dillon and Welch (2006), 244-71.Google Scholar

Dillon, S. and Welch, K. (eds.) (2006), The Representations of War in Ancient Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dingel, J. (2009), Die relative Datierung der Tragödien Senecas (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Dobby-Poirson, F. (2006), Le pathétique dans le théâtre de Robert Garnier (Paris).Google Scholar

Dodson-Robinson, E. (2010), ‘Rending Others: Ethical Contagio in Seneca's Thyestes ’, Mouseion 10, 45-68.Google Scholar

Dodson-Robinson, E. (2011), ‘Performing the “Unperformable” Extispicy Scene in Seneca's Oedipus Rex’, Didaskalia 8.27.Google Scholar

Dodson-Robinson, E. (ed.) (2016), Brill's Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy (Leiden).Google Scholar

Ducrey, P. (2015), ‘War in the Feminine in Ancient Greece’, in Fabre-Serris and Keith (2015), 181-99.Google Scholar

Dudley, D.R. (1965), ‘The Satiric Element in Lucretius’, in id. (ed.), Lucretius (London), 115-30.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (1995), Les monstres de Sénèque: pour une dramaturgie de la tragédie romaine (Paris).Google Scholar

Easterling, P.E. (1985), ‘Anachronism in Greek Tragedy’, JHS 105, 1-10.Google Scholar

Eden, P.T. (ed.) (1984), Seneca: Apocolocyntosis (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2006), Oedipus (London/New York).Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007), Death in Ancient Rome (New Haven CT).Google Scholar

Eliot, T.S. (1950), Selected Essays: New Edition (New York).Google Scholar

Erasmo, M. (2004), Roman Tragedy: From Theatre to Theatricality (Austin TX).Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, M. and Keith, A. (eds.) (2015), Women and War in Antiquity (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Fairweather, J. (1981), Seneca the Elder (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Faller, S. (2002), ‘Accius in der Kritik des Lucilius’, in Faller, S. and Manuwald, G. (eds.), Accius und seine Zeit (Würzburg), 141-60.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (ed.) (1982), Seneca's Troades (Princeton).Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1983), ‘Nihil iam iura naturae valent: Incest and Fratricide in Seneca's Phoenissae’ in Boyle (1983a), 61-76.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R. (2004), Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991), Virgil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic (Oxford).Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2007), ‘Horace's Body, Horace's Books’, in Heyworth, S.J., Fowler, P.G. and Harrison, S.J. (eds.) Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean (Oxford), 174-93.Google Scholar

Ferri, R. (2003), Octavia: A Play Attributed to Seneca (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Ferriss-Hill, J.L. (2015), Roman Satire and the Old Comic Tradition (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Filippi, M. (2015), ‘The Reception of Latin Archaic Tragedy in Ovid's Elegy’, in Harrison (2015), 196-215.Google Scholar

Fishelov, D. (1990), ‘The Vanity of the Reader's Wishes: Rereading Juvenal's Satire 10’, AJP 111, 370-82.Google Scholar

Fiske, G.C. (1920), Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation (Madison).Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (1979), ‘ Pectus o nimium ferum: Act V of Seneca's Hercules Furens ’, Hermes 107, 240-48.Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (1981), ‘Sense-Pauses and Relative Dating in Seneca, Sophocles and Shakespeare’, AJP 102, 289-307.Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (ed.) (1987), Seneca's Hercules Furens: A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary (Ithaca).Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (ed. and tr.) (2002-04), Seneca: Tragedies (2 vols.: Cambridge MA/London).Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (ed.) (2004), Annaeana Tragica: Notes on the Text of Seneca's Tragedies (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (2006-7), ‘Horace, Odes 1.3: Nature's Boundaries’, Eranos 104, 31-40.Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. (ed.) (2008), Seneca (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fitch, J.G. and McElduff, S. (2002), ‘Construction of the Self in Senecan Drama’, Mnemosyne 55, 18-40.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2007), Martial: The World of Epigram (Chicago).Google Scholar

Foley, H.P. (2008), ‘Generic Boundaries in Late Fifth-century Athens’, in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P.J. (eds.), Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin (Oxford), 15-36.Google Scholar

Fowler, D.P. (1995), ‘Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration (Oxford), 248-66.Google Scholar

Fowler, D.P. (1997), ‘On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’, MD 39, 13-34 (reprinted in Fowler (2000), 115-37).Google Scholar

Fowler, D.P. (2000), Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fraisse, S. (1974), Le mythe d'Antigone (Paris).Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S.A. (2009), ‘The Nurse as a Plot-maker in Seneca's Phaedra ’, RFIC 137, 402-23.Google Scholar

Frank, M. (ed.) (1995a), Seneca's Phoenissae: Introduction and Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar

Frank, M. (1995b), ‘The Rhetorical Use of Family Terms in Seneca's Oedipus and Phoenissae ’, Phoenix 49, 121-30.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. (2014), ‘“Bleary Eyes and Drooping Ears”: Images of the Body and Self-representation in Horace Sermones Book One’, BICS 57, 72-100.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (2001a), ‘The ‘Uncanny’’, in Strachey, J. et al. (eds.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Volume 17 (London), 219-56.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (2001b), ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’, in Strachey, J., et al. (eds.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Volume 18 (London), 7-64.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (1993), The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire (Princeton).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2001), Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (ed.) (2005), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2015), ‘Seneca's Apocolocyntosis: Censors in the Afterworld’, in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca (Cambridge), 93-106.Google Scholar

Gale, M.R. (1994), Myth and Poetry in Lucretius (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gale, M.R. (1997), ‘The Shield of Turnus (Aeneid 7.783-92)’, G&R 44, 176-96.Google Scholar

Gale, M.R. (2000), Virgil on the Nature of Things: the Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition, (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gale, M.R. (ed.) (2004), Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality (Swan-sea).Google Scholar

Ganiban, R.T. (2007), Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Garelli-François, M.-H. (1998), ‘Tradition littéraire et création dramatique dans les tragédies de Sénèque: l'exemple des récits de messagers’, Latomus 57, 15-32.Google Scholar

Gellar-Goad, T.H.M. (2012), Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura and Satire, Diss. University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Giardina, G.C.L. (2007), Lucio Anneo Seneca: Tragedie. I (Pisa and Rome).Google Scholar

Giardina, G.C.L. (2009), Lucio Anneo Seneca: Tragedie. II (Pisa and Rome).Google Scholar

Gibert, J. (2003), ‘Apollo's Sacrifice: The Limits of a Metaphor in Greek Tragedy’, HSCP 101, 159-206.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (1938), ‘Bemerkungen zu Senecas Thyestes ’, Philologus 93, 176-83.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2004), ‘Confronting the Beast—from Virgil's Cacus to the Dragons of Cornelis van Haarlem’, PVS 25, 27-48.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L.D. (2015), ‘Don't Stand So Close To Me: The Pietas of Antigone in Seneca's Phoenissae ’, TAPA 145, 199-230.Google Scholar

Giordano Rampioni, A. (1983), ‘Seneca tragico in Persio’, Orpheus 4, 104-07.Google Scholar

Goh, I. (2015), ‘The Campanian Case of Gaius Lucilius: Downtrodden Satire from Suessa Aurunca’, ICS 40, 91-120.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S.M. (1996), ‘The Fall and Rise of Roman Tragedy’, TAPA 126, 265-86.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013), Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil's Aeneid (Oxford).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993), The Loaded Table. Representations of Food in Roman Literature (Oxford).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1994), ‘Horace, Satires 1.5: An Inconsequential Journey’, PCPS 39, 48-66.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (ed.) (2012), Horace: Satires Book I (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Graham, G.H. (1977), Seneca's Oedipus as Drama: Seneca and Sophocles on the Oedipus Legend, Diss. the Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Gransden, K.W. (1976), Virgil: Aeneid Book VIII (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gregory, J.W. (1999-2000), ‘Comic Elements in Euripides’, ICS 24f., 59-74.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1999), Sophocles: Antigone (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Grund, G.R. (2011), Humanist Tragedies (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2003), Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2015), The Sublime Seneca: Ethics, Literature, Metaphysics (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hammond, P. (2009), The Strangeness of Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (1986), Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (1990), ‘Ovid's Theban History: The First Anti-Aeneid?’, CQ 40, 224-35.Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (1993), The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (1997), ‘Virgil and Tragedy’, in Martindale (1997), 312-26.Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (2009), Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (2012), Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hardie, P.R. (2013), ‘Flavian Epic and the Sublime’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.), Flavian Epic Interactions (Berlin), 125-38.Google Scholar

Harrison, G.W.M. (ed.) (2000), Seneca in Performance (London).Google Scholar

Harrison, G.W.M. and Liapis, V. (eds.) (2013), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre (Leiden).Google Scholar

Harrison, G.W.M. (ed.) (2015a), Brill's Companion to Roman Tragedy (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar

Harrison, G.W.M. (2015b), ‘Seneca on the Fall of Troy’, in Harrison (2015a), 118-50.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.J. (2007a), Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace (Oxford).Google Scholar

Harrison, S.J. (2007b), ‘The Primal Voyage and the Ocean of Epos: Two Aspects of Metapoetic Imagery in Catullus, Virgil and Horace’, Dictynna 4 http://dictynna.revues.org/146.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.J. (2013), ‘Didactic and Lyric in Horace Odes 2: Lucretius and Virgil’, in Papanghelis, Harrison and Frangoulidis (2013), 367-74.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999), ‘Longinus On Sublimity’, PCPS 45, 43-74.Google Scholar

Heil, A. (2013), Die dramatische Zeit in Senecas Tragödien (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1974), Untersuchungen zu den Tragödien Senecas (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1983), ‘Poetic Technique and Rhetorical Amplification: Seneca Medea 579-669’, in Boyle (1983a), 94-113.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1989), ‘Not “Women in Roman Satire” but “When Satire Writes ‘Woman”’, in Braund (1989a), 89-125.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004), Morals and Villas in Seneca's Letters: Places to Dwell (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (2000), ‘Drama and Dromena: Bloodshed, Violence, and Sacrificial Metaphor in Euripides’, HSCP 100, 173-88.Google Scholar

Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1965), ‘The Futility of Action: A Study of Seneca's Hercules Furens ’, CP 60, 11-22.Google Scholar

Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1983), ‘The Oedipus of Seneca: An Imperial Tragedy’, in Boyle (1983a), 128-39.Google Scholar

Henry, D. and E. (1985), The Mask of Power: Seneca's Tragedies and Imperial Power (Chicago).Google Scholar

Herington, C.J. (1963), ‘The Influence of Old Comedy on Aeschylus’ Later Tragedies’, TAPA 94, 113-25.Google Scholar

Herington, C.J. (1966), ‘Senecan Tragedy’, Arion 5, 422-71.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998), The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hexter, R., and Selden, D. (eds.) (1992), Innovations of Antiquity (London/New York).Google Scholar

Heyworth, S.J., and Morwood, J.H.W. (2011), A Commentary on Propertius Book 3 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hill, D.E. (2000), ‘Seneca's Choruses’, Mnemosyne 53, 561-87.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1993), ‘Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine’, MD 30, 9-47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (2000), ‘Essential Epic: Genre and Gender from Macer to Statius’, in Depew and Obbink (2000), 221-44.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (2007), ‘Martial's Ovid / Ovid's Martial’, JRS 97, 113-54.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (2011), ‘Seneca's Ovidian Loci ’, SIFC 4 ser . 9, 5-63.Google Scholar

Hine, H.M. (1981), ‘The Structure of Seneca's Thyestes ’, PLLS 3, 259-75.Google Scholar

Hine, H.M. (1989), ‘Medea versus the Chorus: Seneca Medea 1-115’, Mnemosyne 42, 413-19.Google Scholar

Hine, H.M. (ed.) (2000), Seneca: Medea (Warminster).Google Scholar

Hirschberg, T. (ed.) (1987), Senecas Phoenissen: Einleitung und Kommentar (Berlin).Google Scholar

Hollis, A.S. (2007), Fragments of Roman Poetry c. 60 BC – AD 20 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hooley, D.M. (1997), The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Hooley, D.M. (2007), Roman Satire (Malden MA).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (ed.) (2015), Lykophron: Alexandra: Greek Text, Translation, Commentary, and Introduction (Oxford).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (ed. and tr.) (2000), Virgil Aeneid VII: A Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2006), The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2009), Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G.O. (1993), Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal: A Critical Study (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ingleheart, J. (2006), ‘Ovid Tristia 1.2: High Drama on the High Seas’, G&R 53, 73-91.Google Scholar

Innes, D. (2006), ‘Longinus: Structure and Unity’, in Laird, A. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford), 300-12.Google Scholar

Jacquot, J. (1964a), ‘Sénèque, la renaissance et nous’, in Jacquot (1964b), 271-307.Google Scholar

Jacquot, J. (ed.) (1964b), Les tragédies de Sénèque et la théâtre de la Renaissance (Paris).Google Scholar

Jakobi, R. (1988), Der Einfluß Ovids auf den Tragiker Seneca (Berlin).Google Scholar

Janka, M. (2004), ‘Senecas Phaedra: des Dramas Kern und sein episch-elegischer Rahmen’, in Fugmann, J. (ed.), Theater, Theaterpraxis, Theaterkritik im kaiserzeitlichen Rom: Kolloquium anlässlich des 70. Geburtstages von Prof. Dr. Peter Lebrecht Schmidt, 24.25. Juli 2003 (München), 25-57.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H.D. (ed.) (1969), The Tragedies of Ennius (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H.D. (1972), ‘Ennius as Dramatic Poet’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius: Sept Exposés Suivis de Discussions (Fondation Hardt Entretiens 17) (Geneva), 41-95.Google Scholar

Jondorf, G. (1969), Robert Garnier and the Political Tragedy in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Jones, F. (2007), Juvenal and the Satiric Genre (London).Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2002), ‘Satiric Memories: Autobiography and the Construction of Genre’, CJ 97, 215-31.Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2003), ‘Theatre, Spectacle, and the Satirist in Juvenal’, Phoenix 57, 257-75.Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2006), Figuring Genre in Roman Satire (Oxford).Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2012), ‘Life in the Text: The Corpus of Persius’ Satires ’, in Braund, S.M. and Osgood, J. (eds.), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal (Malden MA), 79-96.Google Scholar

Keith, A.M. (2000), Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Keith, A.M. (2015), ‘Elegiac Women and Roman Warfare’, in Fabre-Serris and Keith (2015), 138-56.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. (1993), The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Ker, J. (2009), The Deaths of Seneca (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ker, J. and Winston, J. (eds.) (2012), Elizabethan Seneca: Three Tragedies (London).Google Scholar

Keulen, A.J. (2001), L. Annaeus Seneca: Troades. Introduction, Text and Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, J.T., and Dunn, F.M. (2002), ‘Heracles, Cercopes, and Paracomedy’, TAPA 132, 29-61.Google Scholar

Klossowski, P. (1997), Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, tr. Smith, D. (Chicago).Google Scholar

Knoche, U. (1957), Die römische Satire² (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Kohn, T.D. (2013), The Dramaturgy of Senecan Tragedy (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Koster, S. (2001), ‘Lucilius und die Literarkritik’, in Manuwald (2001a), 121-31.Google Scholar

Kousser, R. (2006), ‘Conquest and Desire: Roman Victoria in Public and Provincial Sculpture’, in Dillon and Welch (2006), 218-43.Google Scholar

Kovacs, D. (ed. and tr.) (2002), Euripides. Helen; Phoenician women; Orestes (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (2013 n), ‘Introduction: The World of Dithyramb’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 1-28.Google Scholar

Kragelund, P. (2008), ‘Senecan Tragedy: Back on Stage?’, in Fitch (2008), 181-94.Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. (1957-8), ‘Zur literarischen Kritik bei Lucilius’, WZROSTOCK 7, 249-84.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1924), ‘Die Kreuzung der Gattungen’, in id. (ed.), Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur (Stuttgart), 202-24.Google Scholar

Kugelmeier, C. (2007), Die innere Vergegenwärtigung des Bühnenspiels in Senecas Tragödien (Munich).Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1992), ‘Le necessità del poeta satirico. Fisiopatologia di una scelta letteraria’, in Mazzini, I. (ed.), Civiltà materiale e letteratura nel mondo antico (Macerata), 55-66.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (2006a), ‘Seminar on “The Purloined Letter”’, Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English tr. Fink, B. (New York), 6-48.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (2006b), ‘Overture to This Collection’, Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English tr. Fink, B. (New York), 3-5.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G. (ed.) (2010), Scholies à Apollonios de Rhodes (Paris).Google Scholar

LaFleur, R. (1979), ‘ Amicitia and the Unity of Juvenal's First Book’, ICS 4, 158-77.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (2012), ‘Orografia di delitti: Seneca, Edipo e il monte maledetto: per un'interpret-azione del “prologo” delle Phoenissae’, in ‘Ibo, ibo qua praerupta protendit iuga / meus Cithaeron’: Paesaggi. luci e ombre nei prologhi tragici senecani (Bologna), 51-69.Google Scholar

Langhans, E.A. (2000), ‘The theatre’, in Payne Fisk, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre (Cambridge), 1-18.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (2000), ‘Le Sabinae di Ennio e il tema della concordia nella tragedia arcaica latina’, in Manuwald, G. (ed.), Identität und Alterität in der frührömischen Tragödie (Würzburg), 241-54.Google Scholar

Larmour, D.H.J. (1990), ‘Tragic contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424-674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19-151)’, ICS 15, 131-41.Google Scholar

Lawall, G. (1983), ‘Virtus and Pietas in Seneca's Hercules Furens’, in Boyle (1983a), 6-26.Google Scholar

Lebègue, R. (1964), ‘Christianisme et libertinage en France’, in Jacquot (1964b), 87-94.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (ed.) (1972), Senecas Tragödien (Darmstadt).Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (ed.) (1978), Der Einfluß Senecas auf das europäische Drama (Darmstadt).Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1981), ‘A Cult Without God or the Unfreedom of Freedom in Seneca Tragicus.’ CJ 77, 32-36.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2002), ‘Die Konzeption der ‘verkehrten Welt’ in Senecas Tragödien’, in L. Castagna and G. Vogt-Spira (eds.), Pervertere: Ästhetik der Verkehrung. Literatur und Kultur neronischer Zeit und ihre Rezeption (München / Leipzig), 105-22 (= Studien zur Originalität der römischen Tragödie [Berlin, 2015], 490-503).Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1996), ‘Varius Rufus, Thyestes and the Appetites of Antony’, PCPS 42, 171-97.Google Scholar

Lenzi, S. (2006), ‘Tracce oraziane nel primo coro della Medea senecana: (a proposito dei vv. 107-109; 113-114)’, Paideia 61, 277-85.Google Scholar

Leo., F. (1908), Der Monolog im Drama (Berlin).Google Scholar

Li Causi, P. (2009), ‘La paternità del male: caos parentale e guerra civile nelle Phoenissae di Seneca’, AOFL 4, 270-96.Google Scholar

Lieberg, G. (1969), ‘Seefahrt und Werk: Untersuchungen zu einer Metapher der antiken, besonders der lateinischen Literatur’, GIF 21, 209-40.Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. (1979), Continuity and Change in Roman Religion (Oxford).Google Scholar

Littlewood, C.A.J. (1997), ‘Seneca's Thyestes: The Tragedy with no Women?’, MD 38, 57-86.Google Scholar

Littlewood, C.A.J. (2002), ‘ Integer ipse? Self-Knowledge and Self-Representation in Persius Satires 4’, Phoenix 56, 56-83.Google Scholar

Littlewood, C.A.J. (2004), Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar

Littlewood, C.A.J. (2007), ‘Poetry and Friendship in Juvenal's Twelfth Satire ’, AJP 128, 389-418.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed. and tr.) (2004; reprinted with corrections 2007), Sophocles. Works. English and Greek. Vols. 1-2. (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987), The Hellenistic Philosophers. Volume One: Translations of the Principal Sources, with Philosophical Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1987), Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman, tr. Forster, Anthony (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2007), ‘Statius, Orpheus and the Post-Augustan Vates ’, Arethusa 40, 145-63.Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2013), The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Low, A. (1985), The Georgic Revolution (Princeton).Google Scholar

Lowe, D. (2015), Monsters and Monstrosity in Augustan Poetry (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1992), ‘A Sympotic Achilles, Horace Epode 13’, AJP 113, 413-33.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1997), Horace's Narrative Odes (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lucas, F.L. (1922), Seneca and Elizabethan Tragedy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Lushkov, A.H. (2016), ‘ Cadmea Proles: Identity and Intertext in Seneca's Hercules Furens ’, CJ 111, 303-16.Google Scholar

Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1989), Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil's Aeneid (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mader, G. (1990), ‘Form and Meaning in Seneca's “Dawn Song” (H.F. 125-201)’, AClass 33, 1-32.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2002a), ‘Masks and the Man: Atreus, Lycus and Performances of Power in Seneca’, in Defosse, Pol (ed.), Hommages à Carl Deroux, 1: Poésie (Brussels), 336-47.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2002b), ‘ Vt pictura poesis: Sea-bull and Senecan Baroque: (Phaedra 1035-49)’, C&M 53, 289-300.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2003), ‘Thyestes’ Belch (Seneca, Thy. 911-12)’, CQ 53, 634-36.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2010), ‘ regno pectus attonitum furit: Power, Rhetoric and Self-division in Seneca's Phoenissae ’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin literature and Roman history 15 (Bruxelles), 287-310.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2014a), ‘Figuring (out) the Avarus: Ethics, Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics in Horace, Satire 1.1’, CJ 109, 419-38.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (2014b), ‘ Hoc quod volo / me nolle: Counter-Volition and Identity Management in Senecan Tragedy’, Pallas 95, 125-62.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2001a), Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit (Munich).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2001b), ‘Lucilius und die Tragödie’, in Manuwald (2001a), 150-65.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2001c). Fabulae praetextae: Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer (Munich).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2011), Roman Republican Theatre (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2012), Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. Vol. 2 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Marti, B. (1945), ‘Seneca's Tragedies. A New Interpretation’, TAPA 76, 216-45.Google Scholar

Martina, A. (1993), ‘I precetti oraziani nell’ Ars poetica intorno alla tragedia’, QCTC 11, 79-118.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Martyn, J.R.C. (1972), ‘Virgilius Satiricus’, in Cicero and Virgil: Studies in Honour of H. Hunt (Amsterdam), 169-91.Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. (1970), ‘Seneca's Oedipus: The Drama in the Word’, TAPA 101, 291-315 (= Fitch [2008], 221-43).Google Scholar

Mayer, R.G. (1987), ‘Studies in Senecan Drama’, CR 37, 24-26.Google Scholar

Mayer, R.G. (1989), ‘Friendship in the Satirists’, in Braund (1989a), 5-22.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1970), Seneca e la Poesia (Milan).Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1996), ‘Orazio e il sublime,’ in Cova, P.V. (ed.), Doctus Horatius, Atti del Convegno di Studi per Virginio Cremona (Brescia, 9-10 febbraio 1995) (Milan), 21-40.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1997), ‘Il tragico in Seneca’, Lexis 15, 79-91.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (2002), ‘Giocasta in prima linea’, in Aloni, A. et al. (eds.), i Sette a Tebe: dal mito alla letteratura (Bologna), 155-68.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (2014a), ‘The Chorus: Seneca as Lyric Poet’, in Damschen and Heil (2014), 561-74.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (2014b), ‘ Iam scelus esse contextum (Questions naturelles IVa, praef. 19), La tragédie sénéquienne comme eidos du nefas ’, Pallas 95, 97-110.Google Scholar

McAuley, M. (2012), ‘Specters of Medea: The Rhetoric of Stepmotherhood and Motherhood in Seneca's Phaedra ’, Helios 39, 37-72.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2012), Plagiarism in Latin Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar

McNelis, C. (2007), Statius’ Thebaid and the Poetics of Civil War (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Meltzer, G. (1988), ‘Dark Wit and Black Humor in Seneca's Thyestes ’, TAPA 118, 309-30.Google Scholar

Mendell, C.W. (1922), ‘Martial and the Satiric Epigram’, CP 17, 1-20.Google Scholar

Miller, P.A. (1998), ‘The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility’, Arethusa 31, 257-83.Google Scholar

Mindt, N. (2013), ‘Griechische Autoren in den Epigrammen Martials’, Millennium Jahrbuch 10, 501-56.Google Scholar

Miola, R.S. (1992), Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mitchell-Boyask, R. (2006), ‘The Marriage of Cassandra and the Oresteia: Text, Image, Performance’, TAPA 136, 269-97.Google Scholar

Mondin, L. (2002-3), ‘Gioco di specchi (tra Lucilio e Persio)’, ITFC 2, 91-113.Google Scholar

Monteleone, C. (1991), Il Thyestes di Seneca: sentieri ermeneutici (Fasano).Google Scholar

Moodie, E.K. (2012), ‘The Bully as Satirist in Juvenal's Third Satire ’, AJP 133, 93-115.Google Scholar

Morelli, A.M. (2004), ‘L'elegia e i suoi confini: Fedra e Medea tra Ovidio e Seneca’, in Pieri, M.P. (ed.), Percorsi della memoria 2 (Firenze), 37-82.Google Scholar

Morelli, A.M. (2007), ‘Il monologo di Giunone nell’ Hercules Furens e l’ Eneide di Virgilio: allusività e confronto di paradigmi letterari in Seneca tragico’, CentoPagine 1, 30-39.Google Scholar

Moreno Soldevila, R. (2006), Martial, Book IV: A Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar

Morford, M.P.O. (1972), ‘A Note on Juvenal 6. 621-61’, CP 67, 198.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1999), Patterns of Redemption in Virgil's ‘Georgics’ (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2003), ‘Child's Play: Ovid and his Critics’, JRS 93, 66-91.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2004), ‘Getting the Measure of Heroes: The Dactylic Hexameter and its Detractors’, in Gale (2004), 1-26.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2005), ‘Satire’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Literature (Oxford/Malden MA), 174-88.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2010), Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse (Oxford).Google Scholar

Moricca, U. (1917), ‘Le Fenicie di Seneca,’ RFIC 45, 1-40.Google Scholar

Most, G.W. (1992), ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’, in Hexter and Seldon (1992), 391-419.Google Scholar

Most, G.W. (2000), ‘Generating Genres: The Idea of the Tragic’ in Depew and Obbink (2000), 15-35.Google Scholar

Motto, A.L. and Clark, J.R., J.R (1975) ‘“There's Something Wrong With the Sun”: Seneca's Oedipus and the Modern Grotesque’, CB 51, 41-44.Google Scholar

Motto, A.L. (1981), ‘ Maxima virtus in Seneca's Hercules Furens ’, CP 76, 100-17.Google Scholar

Motto, A.L. (1985), ‘Seneca's Agamemnon. Tragedy Without a Hero’, Athenaeum 63, 136-44.Google Scholar

Motto, A.L. (1988), Senecan Tragedy (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Motto, A.L. (1995), ‘Senecan Paratragoedia’, CFC(L) 9, 135-49.Google Scholar

Mouflard, M. (1963) (ed.), Robert Garnier, 1545-1590 vol. 2 (La Ferté-Bernard).Google Scholar

Mowbray, C. (2012), ‘Captive audience? The Aesthetics of nefas in Senecan Drama’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R.M. (eds.), Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity (Leiden), 393-420.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (ed.) (1993), Horace: Satires II (Warminster).Google Scholar

Müller, G. (1953), ‘ Oedipus als Drama’, Hermes 81, 447-64.Google Scholar

Murley, C. (1939), ‘Lucretius and the History of Satire’, TAPA 70, 380-95.Google Scholar

Myers, K.S. (ed.) (2009), Ovid Metamorphoses Book XIV (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Mynors, R.A.B. (ed.) (1990), Virgil, Georgics (Oxford).Google Scholar

Neger, M. (2012), Martials Dichtergedichte: das Epigramm als Medium der poetischen Selbst-reflexion (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Nelis, D.P. (2004), ‘From Didactic to Epic: Georgics 2.458-3.48’, in Gale (2004), 73-107.Google Scholar

Németi, A. (ed. and tr.) (2003), Lucio Anneo Seneca: Medea (Pisa).Google Scholar

Nisbet, R.G.M. (1963), ‘Persius’, in Sullivan, J.P. (ed.), Critical Essays on Roman Literature: Satire (London), 39-71.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R.G.M. (1990), ‘The Dating of Seneca's Tragedies, with Special Reference to Thyestes ’, PLLS 6, 95-114.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R.G.M. and Rudd, N. (eds.) (2004), A Commentary on Horace Odes, Book III (Oxford).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M.C. (2004), The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton).Google Scholar

O'Gorman, E. (2005), ‘Citation and Authority in Seneca's Apocolocyntosis’, in Freudenburg (2005), 95-108.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1998), Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Opelt, I. (1972a), ‘Senecas Konzeption des Tragischen’, in Lefèvre (1972), 92-128.Google Scholar

Opelt, I. (1972b), ‘Zu Senecas Phoenissen’, in Lefèvre (1972), 272-85.Google Scholar

Owen, W. (1968), ‘Commonplace and Dramatic Symbol in Seneca's Tragedies’, TAPA 99, 291-313.Google Scholar

Palmieri, N. (1983), ‘Sulla struttura drammatica dell’ Edipo di Seneca’, AFLS 4, 115-64.Google Scholar

Palmieri, N. (1989), ‘ Alia temptanda est via. Allusività e innovazione drammatica nell’ Edipo di Seneca’, MD 23, 175-89.Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. (2009), Greek Tragedy in Vergil's Aeneid (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, T. (2004), ‘Herakles and Hercules: The Hero's Ambivalence in Euripides and Seneca’, Mnemosyne 57, 257-83.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, T.D., Harrison, S.J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.) (2013), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations (Berlin).Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2013), ‘Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: Intertextuality and Literary Deviancy between Law, Rhetoric, and Literature in Roman Imperial Culture’, AJP 134, 83-100.Google Scholar

Petrone, G. (1988-89), ‘Potere e parentela nelle Phoenissae di Seneca’, QCTC 6-, 243-58.Google Scholar

Pincombe, M. (2012), ‘Tragic Inspiration in Jasper Heywood's Translation of Seneca's Thyestes: Melpomene or Megaera?’, in Betteridge, T. and Walker, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Tudor Drama (Oxford), 531-46.Google Scholar

Plaza, M. (2006), The Function of Humour in Roman Verse Satire: Laughing and Lying (Oxford).Google Scholar

Poe, E.A. (1884), ‘The Purloined Letter’, The Works of Edgar Allan Poe, Volume II (New York), 389-416.Google Scholar

Poe, J.P. (1969), ‘An Analysis of Seneca's Thyestes ’, TAPA 100, 355-76.Google Scholar

Poe, J.P. (1983), ‘The Sinful Nature of the Protagonist of Seneca's Oedipus’, in Boyle (1983a), 140-58.Google Scholar

Pollman, K. (1996), ‘Die Funktion des Mythos in den Satiren Juvenals’, Hermes 124, 480-90.Google Scholar

Porter, J.I. (2007), ‘Lucretius and the Sublime’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (Cambridge), 167-84.Google Scholar

Powell, J.G.F. (1999), ‘Stylistic Registers in Juvenal’, in Adams, J.N. and Mayer, R.G. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Oxford), 311-34.Google Scholar

Pratt, N.T. (1939), Dramatic Suspense in Seneca and in his Greek Precursors (Princeton).Google Scholar

Pucci, J. (1992), ‘Horace and Virgilian Mimesis: A Re-Reading of Odes 1.3’, CW 85, 659-73.Google Scholar

Pucci, J. (1998), The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition (New Haven CT).Google Scholar

Pucci, P. (1992), ‘Human Sacrifices in the Oresteia’, in Hexter and Selden (1992), 513-36.Google Scholar

Puelma Piwonka, M. (1949), Lucilius und Kallimachos: zur Geschichte einer Gattung der hellenistisch-römischen Poesie (Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C.J. (1986), Artifices of Eternity: Horace's Fourth Book of Odes (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C.J. (1995), Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence (Chapel Hill/London).Google Scholar

Pypłacz, J. (2010), The Aesthetics of Senecan Tragedy (Krakow).Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1993), Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic form from Virgil to Milton (Princeton NJ).Google Scholar

Ramsby, T.R. and Severy-Hoven, B. (2007), ‘Gender, Sex, and the Domestication of the Empire in Art of the Augustan Age’, Arethusa 40, 43-71.Google Scholar

Reckford, K.J. (1998), ‘Reading the Sick Body: Decomposition and Morality in Persius’ Third Satire ’, Arethusa 31, 337-54.Google Scholar

Reed, J.D. (2007), Virgil's Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid (Princeton NJ).Google Scholar

Rehm, R. (1994), Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy (Princeton NJ).Google Scholar

Relihan, J.C. (1993), Ancient Menippean Satire (Baltimore/London).Google Scholar

Rimell, V. (2008), Martial's Rome: Empire and the Ideology of Epigram (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Roberts, M. (1984) ‘Horace Satires 2.5: Restrained Indignation’, AJP 105, 426-33.Google Scholar

Robinson, T.J. (2005), ‘In the Court of Time: The Apocolocyntosis of Seneca’, Arethusa 38, 223-57.Google Scholar

Rolland, E. (1906), De l'influence de Sénèque le père et des rhéteurs sur Sénèque le philosophe (Gand).Google Scholar

Romm, J. (2014), Dying Every Day: Seneca at the Court of Nero (New York).Google Scholar

Ronconi, A. (1963), ‘Lucilio critico letterario’, Maia 15, 515-25.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1995), ‘Sangue sulla scena: un precetto oraziano (Ars poet. 185) e la Medea di Seneca’, in Delfino, A. (ed.), Varietà d'harmonia et d'affetto: studi in onore di Giovanni Marzi per il suo LXX compleanno (Lucca), 3-10.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (2006), ‘ Libido amandi e libido regnandi ovvero elegia e potere nel teatro senecano’, Dioniso 5, 94-105.Google Scholar

Rose, A.R (1985), ‘Seneca's Dawn Song (Hercules Furens, 125-58), and the Imagery of Cosmic Disruption’, Latomus 44, 101-23.Google Scholar

Rosen, R.M. (2007), Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire (Oxford).Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T.G. (1989), Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology (Berkeley CA).Google Scholar

Ross, D.O. (1975), Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Rudd, N. (1986), Themes in Roman Satire (London).Google Scholar

Santirocco, M.S. (1986), Unity and Design in Horace's Odes (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar

Scharffenberger, E.W. (1996), ‘Euripidean “Paracomedy”: A Re-consideration of the Antiope ’, T&P 17, 65-72.Google Scholar

Schauer, M. (ed.) (2012), Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. Vol. 1 (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1992), ‘Forms of Senecan Intertextuality,’ Vergilius 38, 56-63.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2003), The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2005), ‘Roman Tragedy’, in Bushnell (2005), 269-86.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2006), ‘A Dream Shattered? Pastoral Anxieties in Senecan Drama’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral (Leiden), 427-49.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2009), ‘Horace's Bacchic Poetics’, in Houghton, L.B.T. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and his Readers (Cambridge), 61-79.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2014), ‘Seneca's Agamemnon: the Entropy of Tragedy’, Pallas 95, 179-91.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E.A. (1977), ‘Lucilius kritisiert Ennius und andere Dichter: zu Lucilius fr. 148 Marx’, MH 34, 122-29.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E.A. (2014), ‘Space and Time in Senecan Drama’, in Damschen and Heil (2014), 531-46.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Wartenberg, H.M. (1888), Seneca's Influence on Robert Garnier. Diss. Cornell.Google Scholar

Schmitz, C. (2000), Das Satirische in Juvenals Satiren (Berlin).Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (1987), ‘The Tragic Wedding’, JHS 107, 106-30.Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (1989), ‘Homeric and Tragic Sacrifice’, TAPA 119, 87-95.Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (1994), Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City-State (Oxford).Google Scholar

Secci, E. (2000a), ‘ Non mouent diuos preces (Phaedr. 1242): aspetti delle invocazioni agli dèi nelle tragedie di Seneca’, parts 1 and 2: Prometheus 26, 47-70 and 241-62.Google Scholar

Seeck, G.A. (1995), ‘Eine satirische Ars poetica für Piso: Bemerkungen zu Form und Absicht von Horaz epist. 2, 3’, A&A 41, 142-60.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1959), ‘Ὕψος and the Problem of Cultural Decline in the De Sublimitate ’, HSCP 64, 121-46.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1966), ‘Orpheus and the Fourth Georgic: Vergil on Nature and Civilization’, AJP 87, 307-25.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1983), ‘Dissonant Sympathy: Song, Orpheus and the Golden Age in Seneca's Tragedies’, in Boyle (1983a), 229-51.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1984), ‘Senecan Baroque: The Death of Hippolytus in Seneca, Ovid, and Euripides’, TAPA 114, 311-25.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986a), ‘Boundary Violation and the Landscape of the Self in Senecan Tragedy’, in Interpreting Greek Tragedy: Myth, Poetry, Text (Ithaca/London), 315-36 (= A&A 29 [1983], 172-87).Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986b), Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra (Princeton NJ).Google Scholar

Seidensticker, B. (1978), ‘Comic Elements in Euripides’ Bacchae ’, AJP 99, 303-20.Google Scholar

Seidensticker, B. (1982), Palintonos harmonia: Studien zu komischen Elementen in der griechischen Tragödie (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Seidensticker, B. (1985), ‘ Maius solito: Senecas Thyestes und die tragoedia rhetorica’, A&A 31, 116-36.Google Scholar

Seo, J.M. (2013), Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar

Sergi, E. (1989), ‘Marziale ed i temi mitologici nella poesia epica e tragica dell'età argentea (Ep. 10, 4)’, GIF 41, 53-64.Google Scholar

Shelton, J. (1978), Seneca's Hercules Furens: Theme, Structure, and Style (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Shelton, J. (1983), ‘Revenge or Resignation: Seneca's Agamemnon’, in Boyle (1983a), 159-83.Google Scholar

Sklenár, R. (2007/8), ‘Seneca, Oedipus 980-94: How Stoic a Chorus?’, CJ 103, 183-94.Google Scholar

Slaney, H. (2013), ‘Seneca's Chorus of One’, in Billings, J., Budelmann, F. and MacIntosh, F. (eds.), Choruses, Ancient and Modern (Oxford), 99-116.Google Scholar

Slaney, H. (2016), The Senecan Aesthetic: A Performance History (Oxford).Google Scholar

Slater, N.W. (2015), ‘Roman Tragedy through a Comic Lens’, in Harrison (2015), 283-308.Google Scholar

Smith, R.S. (2011), Seneca: Phaedra and Other Plays (London).Google Scholar

Smith, R.S. (2014), ‘De Otio’, in Damschen and Heil (2014), 147-52.Google Scholar

Smith, W.S. (1989), ‘Heroic Models for the Sordid Present: Juvenal's View of Tragedy’, ANRW II.33.1, 811-23.Google Scholar

Sommerstein, A.H. (2005), ‘Tragedy and Myth’, in Bushnell (2005), 163-80.Google Scholar

Spika, J. (1890), De imitatione Horatiana in Senecae canticis chori (Wien).Google Scholar

Spisak, A.L. (1994), ‘Martial 6.61: Callimachean Poetics Revalued’, TAPA 124, 291-308.Google Scholar

Staley, G.A. (2000), ‘Umbricius’ Rome, Vergil's Troy’, MAAR 45, 85-98.Google Scholar

Staley, G.A. (2010), Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar

Staley, G.A. (2014), ‘Making Oedipus Roman’, Pallas 95, 111-24.Google Scholar

Star, C. (2015), ‘Roman Tragedy and Philosophy’, in Harrison (2015), 238-59.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (1984), Antigones (Oxford).Google Scholar

Stevens, J.A. (1999), ‘Seneca and Horace: Allegorical Technique in Two Odes to Bacchus (Hor. Carm. 2.19 and Sen. Oed. 403-508)’, Phoenix 53, 281-307.Google Scholar

Stone, D. (1974), French Humanist Tragedy (Manchester).Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (2008), ‘Staging Seneca: The Production of Troas as a Philological Experiment’, in Fitch (2008), 195-220.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J.P. (1987a), ‘Martial's Satiric Epigrams’, in Hardie, P., Whitby, M. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble (Bristol), 259-65.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J.P. (1987b), ‘Martial’, Ramus 16, 177-91.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J.P. (1991) Martial: The Unexpected Classic (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Sutton, D.F. (1986), Seneca on the Stage (Leiden).Google Scholar

Swift, L. (2009), ‘Sexual and Familial Distortion in Euripides’ Phoenissae ’, TAPA 139, 53-87.Google Scholar

Swift, L. (2010), The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric (Oxford).Google Scholar

Taplin, O. (1978), Greek Tragedy in Action (Berkeley CA).Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. (ed.) (1976), Seneca: Agamemnon (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. (1978), ‘Senecan Drama and Its Antecedents’, HSCP 82, 213-63.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. (1985), Seneca's Thyestes (Atlanta GA).Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. (1995), ‘Greek and Roman in Seneca's Tragedies’, HSCP 97, 215-30.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. (2012) Virgil: Aeneid Book XII (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Theodorakopoulos, E. (1997), ‘Closure: The Book of Virgil’, in Martindale (1997), 155-65.Google Scholar

Thomas, R.F. (1988), Virgil: Georgics, Vol. 1: Books I-II (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Thummer, E. (1972), ‘Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum König Oedipus des Senecas und Sophokles’, Serta Philologica Aenipontana 2, 151-95.Google Scholar

Tietze Larson, V. (1989), ‘Seneca's Epic Theatre’, in Deroux (1989), 279-304.Google Scholar

Töchterle, K. (1994), Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Oedipus (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Tondo, I. (2010), ‘Le corps du roi: esthétique de la tyrannie dans les tragédies de Sénèque’, in Garelli, M.-H. (ed.), Corps en jeu: de l'Antiquité à nos jours: actes du colloque international ‘Corps en jeu’, Université de Toulouse II-Le Mirail, 9-11 octobre 2008 (Rennes), 41-54.Google Scholar

Trinacty, C. (2007), ‘Seneca's Heroides: Elegy in Seneca's Medea ’, CJ 103, 63-78.Google Scholar

Trinacty, C. (2009), ‘Like Father, Like Son?: Selected Examples of Intertextuality in Seneca the Younger and Seneca the Elder’, Phoenix 63, 260-77.Google Scholar

Trinacty, C. (2014), Senecan Tragedy and the Reception of Augustan Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar

Tyrrell, R.Y. (1895), Latin Poetry: Lectures Delivered in 1893 on the Percy Turnbull Memorial (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2005), ‘Persius on his Predecessors: A Re-Examination’, CQ 55, 559-71.Google Scholar

Urech, H.J. (1999), Hoher und niederer Stil in den Satiren Juvenals: Untersuchung zur Stilhöhe von Wörtern und Wendungen und inhaltliche Interpretationen von Passagen mit auffälligen Stilwechseln (Bern).Google Scholar

Van Mal-Maeder, D. (2004), ‘Sénèque le tragique et les Grandes declamations du Pseudo-Quintilien: Poétique d'une métamorphose’, in Zimmerman, M. and Van der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at his 75th Birthday (Leuven), 189-200.Google Scholar

Varakis, A. (2010), ‘Body and Mask in Aristophanic Performance’, BICS 53, 17-38.Google Scholar

Varner, E.R. (2000), ‘Grotesque Vision: Seneca's Tragedies and Neronian Art’, in Harrison (2000), 119-36.Google Scholar

Viansino, G. (1993), Seneca teatro. 2 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Vidal-Naquet, P. (1972), ‘Chasse et sacrifice dans l'Orestie d'Eschyle’, in Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne (Paris), 133-58.Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Ovid, Vergil, Manilius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Walsh, L. (2012), ‘The Metamorphoses of Seneca's Medea’, Ramus 41, 71-93.Google Scholar

Waltz, R. (1948), ‘Lucrèce satirique’, Lettres d'humanité 8, 78-103.Google Scholar

Watson, L. (2003a), ‘Bassa's Borborysms: On Martial and Catullus’, Antichthon 37, 1-12.Google Scholar

Watson, L. (2003b), A Commentary on Horace's Epodes (Oxford).Google Scholar

Watson, L. and Watson, P. (eds.) (2003), Martial: Select Epigrams (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Watson, L. and Watson, P. (eds.) (2014) Juvenal: Satire VI (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Weber, H. (1981), ‘Comic Humor and Tragic Spirit: The Augustan Distinction between Horace and Juvenal’, CML 1, 275-89.Google Scholar

Whittaker, T. (2009), ‘Sex and the Sack of the City’, G&R 56, 234-42.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L.P. (1963), Golden Latin Artistry (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Williams, G. (2012), The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca's Natural Questions (Oxford).Google Scholar

Wilson, E. (2004), Mocked with Death: Tragic Overliving from Sophocles to Milton (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Wilson, E. (2010), Seneca: Six Tragedies (Oxford).Google Scholar

Wilson, E. (2014), The Greatest Empire: A Life of Seneca (New York).Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (1983), ‘The Tragic Mode of Seneca's Troades’, in Boyle (1983a), 27-60.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2003), ‘The Importance of the Octavia ’, in The Tragedy of Nero's Wife. Studies on the Octavia Praetexta, Prudentia 35.1 (Auckland), 1-12.Google Scholar

Winkler, M.M. (1989), ‘The Function of Epic in Juvenal's Satires’, in Deroux (1989), 414-43.Google Scholar

Winter, K. (2014), Artificia mali: das Böse als Kunstwerk in Senecas Rachetragödien (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Witke, C. (1970), Latin Satire (Leiden).Google Scholar

Wray, D. (2009), ‘Seneca and Tragedy's Reason’, in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.). Seneca and the Self (Cambridge), 237-54.Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2005), Euripides’ Escape-Tragedies: A Study of Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia among the Taurians (Oxford).Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2010), ‘The Tragedian as Critic: Euripides and Early Greek Poetics’, JHS 130, 165-84.Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2012), The Comedian as Critic: Greek Old Comedy and Poetics (London).Google Scholar

Xanthopoulou, P. (2008), Antigone de Garnier et la Thebaïde de Racine: deux avatars de l'Antigone de Sophocle. Diss. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar

Zanobi, A. (2014), Seneca's Tragedies and the Aesthetics of Pantomime (London).Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F.I. (1965), ‘The Motif of the Corrupt Sacrifice in Aeschylus’ Oresteia ’, TAPA 96, 463-508.Google Scholar

Zietsman, J.C. (2004), ‘Persius on Poetic (In)digestion’, Akroterion 49, 73-88.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, B. (2008), ‘Seneca and Pantomime’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime (Oxford), 218-26.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, A. (1993), ‘ Vrbs direpta, or How the Romans Sacked Cities’, in Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World (London), 69-91.Google Scholar

Žižek, S. (2006), The Parallax View (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1966), Die Rezitationsdramen Senecas (Meisenheim am Glan).Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (ed.) (1986a), Lucii Annaei Senecae tragoediae. Incertorum auctorum Hercules [Oetaeus], Octavia (Oxford).Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1986b), Kritischer Kommentar zu den Tragödien Senecas (Mainz).Google Scholar

Zwierlein, O. (1987), Senecas Phaedra und ihre Vorbilder (Mainz).Google Scholar