Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T19:00:57.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ARISTOPHANES VS TYPHON: CO(S)MIC RIVALRY, VOICE AND TEMPORALITY IN KNIGHTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2014

Mario Telò
Mario Telò*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Recent studies have analysed the essential role of interpoetic rivalry in Aristophanes' comic imagination. Zachary Biles has shown that ‘festival agonistics provide an underlying logic for the overall thematic design of individual plays’ and that ‘the plays can be treated as creative responses to the competitions.’ Aristophanes' dramatisation of comic competition has been viewed as a reflection of the struggles of political factions in late-fifth-century Athens or as an expression of a ‘rhetoric of self-promotion’ that builds the comic plot through the mutual borrowing of comic material (jokes, running gags). This paper suggests that Knights presents interpoetic rivalry as a conflict of embodied aesthetic modes. In this play, Aristophanes' tendentious definition of his comic self against his predecessor Cratinus results in opposed ways of conceptualising the sonic quality of dramatic performance and its material effects on the audience. The nexus of voice and temporality, which, as I argue, shapes the play's agonistic plot, equates the intergenerational duelling of Aristophanes' and Cratinus' political counterparts (the Sausage Seller and the older Paphlagon, respectively) to a contrast of somatic experiences grounded in sound.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , June 2014 , pp. 25 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C.A. (1989), ‘Themistocles and Cleon in Aristophanes' Knights, 763ff.’, AJP 110, 10-16.Google Scholar
Angeli Bernardini, P., Cingano, E., Gentili, B. and Giannini, P. (ed., comm. and tr.) (1995), Pindaro: Le Pitiche (Milan).Google Scholar
Bakola, E. (2010), Cratinus and the Art of Comedy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets (London).Google Scholar
Bennett, L.J., and Tyrrell, W.B. (1990), ‘Making Sense of Aristophanes' Knights ’, Arethusa 23, 235-54.Google Scholar
Biles, Z. (2011), Aristophanes and the Poetics of Competition (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaise, F. (1992), ‘L' épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d' Hésiode (v. 820-885): la stabilisation du monde’, REG 105, 349-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A.M. (1982), ‘The Parabasis in Aristophanes: Prolegomena, Acharnians ’, CQ 32, 27-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A.M. (1993), Aristophanes: Myth, Ritual and Comedy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J.S. (2003), Hesiod's Cosmos (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. (1999), ‘Hesiod and the Divine Voice of the Muses’, Arethusa 32, 241-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M., and Vernant, J.-P. (1974), Les ruses de l'intelligence: la mètis des Grecs (Paris).Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, V. (1995), ‘Tifone in Pindaro e in Eschilo’, RFIC 123, 129-39.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1987), Cleon, Knights, and Aristophanes’ Politics (Lanham/New York/ London).Google Scholar
Fenno, J.B. (2005), ‘A Great Wave Against the Stream: Water Imagery in Iliadic Battle Scenes’, AJP 126, 475-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1987), Agonistic Poetry: The Pindaric Mode in Pindar, Horace, Hölderlin, and the English Ode (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (1992), Homer: The Poetry of the Past (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Garcia, L.F. Jr. (2013), Homeric Durability: Telling Time in the Iliad (Cambridge MA/ London).Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991), The Poet's Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Goslin, O. (2010), ‘Hesiod's Typhonomachy and the Ordering of Sound’, TAPA 140, 351-73.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993), The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. (2005), ‘Virgil's Sibyl and the “Many Mouths” Cliché (Aen. 6. 625-7)’, CQ 55, 170-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (ed. and comm.) (1995), Homer: Iliad, Book 9 (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. (ed. and comm.) (1987), Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1990), ‘The Sounds of the Voice in Old Comedy’, in Craik, E.M. (ed.), ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover (Oxford), 69-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2012), ‘ Amousia: Living Without the Muses’, in Rosen, R.M. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity (Leiden/Boston), 15-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. (2005), ‘Nonnus' Typhon: The Musical Giant’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Roman and Greek Imperial Epic (Rethymnon), 117-29.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2007), ‘Contrasts’, in Heyworth, S.J. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler (Oxford), 141-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. (2012), Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1990), ‘Aristophanes and His Rivals’, G&R 37, 143-58.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (2000), ‘Intratext and Irony in Aristophanes’, in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.), Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations (Oxford), 227-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesk, J. (2007), ‘Combative Capping in Aristophanic Comedy’, CCJ 53, 124-57.Google Scholar
Hopman, M.G. (2012), Scylla: Myth, Metaphor, Paradox (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. (1991), The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (ed. and comm.) (1999), Theocritus: A Selection (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009), ‘Hesiod's Style: Towards an Ancient Analysis’, in F. Montanari, A. Rengakos and Tsagalis, C. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Hesiod (Leiden/Boston), 253-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.M. (1999), ‘Hesiod's Descriptions of Tartarus’, Phoenix 53, 8-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaimio, M. (1977), Characterization of Sound in Early Greek Literature (Helsinki).Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2002), ‘Reinscribing the Muse: Greek Drama and the Discourse of Inspired Creativity’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature (Oxford), 69-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilja, S. (1972), The Treatment of Odours in the Poetry of Antiquity (Helsinki).Google Scholar
Longo, O. (1991), ‘Conciapelli e cultura in Grecia antica’, Lares 57, 5-24.Google Scholar
Martin, R.P. (1984), ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the Instruction of Princes’, TAPA 114, 29-48.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (1989), ‘L'eroe e il mostro (Aristofane, Vespe 1029-1044)’, RFIC 117, 410-23.Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2002), ‘I Cavalieri di Aristofane e la riabilitazione di Temistocle’, QS 28, 257-99.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (forthcoming), Talking to Tyrants: Pindar and the Construction of Sicilian Monarchy (Oxford/New York).Google Scholar
Nightingale, A.W. (1995), Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, N.O. (1992), Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2004), ‘Sibylline Syllables: The Intratextual Aeneid ’, PCPS 50, 29-45.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2009), Freud's Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S.D. (1990), ‘The New Demos of Aristophanes’ Knights ’, Eranos 88, 60-63.Google Scholar
Olson, S.D. (ed. and comm.) (2002), Aristophanes: Acharnians (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S.D. (2007), Broken Laughter: Select Fragments of Greek Comedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, E.J. (1982), ‘The Enneakrounos Fountain-House’, JHS 102, 222-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peponi, A.E. (2012), Frontiers of Pleasure: Models of Aesthetic Response in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1981), ‘Artemide e la mêtis di Temistocle’, QS 13, 143-66.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. (2010), The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1977), Hesiod and the Language of Poetry (Baltimore/London).Google Scholar
Purves, A.C. (2004), ‘Topographies of Time in Hesiod’, in Rosen, R.M. (ed.), Time and Temporality in the Ancient World (Philadelphia), 147-68.Google Scholar
Purves, A.C. (2010), ‘Wind and Time in Homeric Epic’, TAPA 140, 323-50.Google Scholar
Rood, N. (2007), ‘Hesiod's Metallurgy Simile (Th. 861-7)’, CCJ 53, 112-23.Google Scholar
Rosen, R.M. (2000), ‘Cratinus’ Pytine and the Construction of the Comic Self’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy (London/Swansea), 23-39.Google Scholar
Rosen, R.M. (2007), Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2002), ‘A Total Write-Off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the Rhetoric of Comic Competition’, CQ 52, 138-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2011), Politics and Anti-Realism in Athenian Old Comedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharffenberger, E. (2007), ‘ Deinon Eribremetas: The Sound and Sense of Aeschylus in Aristophanes’ Frogs ’, CW 100, 229-49.Google Scholar
Scholtz, A. (2004), ‘Friends, Lovers, Flatterers: Demophilic Courtship in Aristophanes’ Knights ’, TAPA 134, 263-93.Google Scholar
Sfyroeras, P. (2009), ‘The Comic Poetics of Apollo in Aristophanes’ Knights ’, in L. Athanassaki, R.P. Martin and Miller, J.F. (eds.), Apolline Politics and Poetics (Athens), 501-19.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (1995), ‘Poetic Rivalry and the Caricature of Comic Poets: Cratinus’ Pytine and Aristophanes’ Wasps ’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E.W. Handley (London), 56-80.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (2009), Aristophanes the Democrat: The Politics of Satirical Comedy During the Peloponnesian War (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A.H. (ed. and comm.) (1981), Aristophanes: Knights (Warminster).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A.H. (2009), Talking About Laughter and Other Studies in Greek Comedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telò, M. (2013), ‘Aristophanes, Cratinus and the Smell of Comedy’, in Butler, S. and Purves, A. (eds.), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses (Durham), 53-69.Google Scholar
Too, Y.L. (1998), The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford).Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2011), ‘In the Footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, Allusion, and Metapoetics in Euripides’, AJP 132, 177-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1969), Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs (Paris).Google Scholar
West, M.L. (ed. and comm.) (1966), Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford).Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2002), Love Among the Ruins: The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens (Princeton).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2002), The Cast of Character: Style in Greek Literature (Austin).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2008), Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar