Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:55:41.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PRESENT, FUTURE AND PAST IN THE HOMERIC HYMN TO APOLLO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2019

Oliver Passmore*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Within Classics, there is growing interest in the nature of reperformance, particularly in relation to archaic and classical Greek poetry and drama. Developing out of the now well-established ‘performative turn’ in studies of early Greek song, and gaining impetus from a series of publications focussing on the contextual specificity of archaic lyric and drama, those interested in reperformance ask what it means for a song or a play, composed for a specific occasion, to be reperformed in another time and (potentially) another place. While interest in reperformance is certainly not new, the debate is now increasingly taking place in dialogue with parallel studies of reperformance in other disciplines. Research in performance studies has articulated a paradox at the heart of reperformance: since a performance is imagined as a singular event that exists only in that moment, and in a specific context, reperformance is an attempt to repeat the unique. Theorists and practitioners have in turn explored this paradox in relation to the restagings and re-enactments of one-time events and performances, such as battle re-enactments, the reconstruction of ballet choreographies before the days of film and live performance art. These examples reveal the complex temporalities involved in reperforming notionally one-time events, as an attempt to capture the ephemeral and collapse the present and the past (as well as the there and the not-there) in the ‘syncopated time’ of the reperformance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to Helen Morales and the anonymous reader for their helpful comments and suggestions. I am also grateful to Felix Budelmann for sharing with me his work on reperformance before its publication. This article is dedicated to Renaud Gagné, with whom I have enjoyed so many stimulating conversations about the Hymn to Apollo. All errors are my own.

References

Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds) (2012), Reading the Victory Ode (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139017626Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (1989), L'aedo e i Tiranni: Richerche sull'Inno Omerico a Apollo (Rome).Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (2009), ‘The Politics of Composition and Performance of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, in Athanassaki, Martin and Miller (2009), 5565.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L., Martin, R.P., and Miller, J.F. (eds) (2009), Apolline Politics and Poetics (Athens).Google Scholar
Bakker, E.J. (2002), ‘Remembering the god's arrival’, Arethusa 35(1), 6381.10.1353/are.2002.0002Google Scholar
Bergren, A.L.T. (1982), ‘Sacred apostrophe: re-presentation and imitation in the Homeric Hymns’, Arethusa 15, 83108.Google Scholar
Böhme, R. (1937), Das Prooimion, eine Form sakraler Dichtung der Griechen (Bühl Baden).Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. (2000), ‘Sull'idea di “sotterfugio orale” negli epinici pindarici’, QUCC 66(3), 6986.Google Scholar
Bouchon, R., Brillet-Dubois, P., and Le Meur-Weissman, N. (eds) (2012), Hymnes de la Grèce Antique. Approches littéraires et historiques (Lyon).Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (ed.) (2009), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric (Cambridge).10.1017/CCOL9780521849449Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2013), ‘Greek Festival Choruses In and Out of Context’, in Billings, J., Budelmann, F. and Macintosh, F. (eds), Choruses, Ancient and Modern (Oxford), 8198.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670574.003.0006Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2017), ‘Performance, Reperformance, Preperformance: The Paradox of Repeating the Unique in Pindaric Epinician and Beyond’, in Hunter and Uhlig (2017), 4262.10.1017/9781316597798.003Google Scholar
Bundy, E.L. (1962), Studia Pindarica (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1979), ‘Kynaithos, Polycrates and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, in Bowerstock, G.W., Burkert, W. and Putnam, M.C.J. (eds), Arktouros: Hellenic studies presented to Bernard M.W. Knox (Berlin/New York), 5360.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1987), ‘The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century BC: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus’, in Bothmer, D. (ed.), Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World (Malibu), 4362.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1977), Les Chœurs de Jeunes Filles en Grèce Archaïque, Vol. I: Morphologie, Function Religieuse et Sociale (Rome).Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1994–95a), ‘From Choral Poetry to Tragic Stasimon: The Enactment of Women's Song’, Arion 3(1), 136–54.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1994–95b), ‘Les Hymnes homériques: modalités énonciatives et fonctions’, Metis 9–10, 391400.10.3406/metis.1994.1040Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1995), The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2011), ‘The Homeric Hymns as Poetic Offerings: Musical and Ritual Relationships with the Gods’, in Faulkner (2011b), 334–56.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1981), A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar (New York).Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1991), ‘The Victory Ode in Performance: The Case for the Chorus’, CPh 86, 192200.Google Scholar
Càssola, F. (ed.) (1975), Inni Omerici (Milan).Google Scholar
Chappell, M. (2011), ‘The Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Question of Unity’, in Faulkner (2011b), 5981.Google Scholar
Christensen, J.P. (2010), ‘First-person futures in Homer’, AJP 131(4), 543–71.Google Scholar
Clay, J.S. (1989), The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns (Princeton).Google Scholar
Clay, J.S. (1997), ‘The Homeric Hymns’, in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds), A New Companion to Homer (Leiden/Boston), 489507.10.1163/9789004217607_023Google Scholar
Costantini, M., and Lallot, J. (1987), ‘Le προοίμιον est-il un proème?’, in Constantini, M. (ed.), Le texte et ses representations (Paris), 1227.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (2015), Theory of the Lyric (Cambridge MA).10.4159/9780674425781Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2004), ‘Reperformance Scenarios for Pindar's Odes’, in Mackie (2004), 4970.Google Scholar
D'Alessio, G.B. (2004), ‘Past future and present past: temporal deixis in Greek archaic lyric’, Arethusa 37, 267–94.10.1353/are.2004.0020Google Scholar
D'Alessio, G.B. (2009), ‘Language and Pragmatics’, in Budelmann (2009), 114–29.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. (1933), Die archaische Mythenerzählung: Folgerungen aus dem homerischen Apollonhymnos (Berlin).Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. (ed.) (1997), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy (Cambridge).10.1017/CCOL0521412455Google Scholar
Faraone, C. (1995), ‘The “performative future” in three Hellenistic incantations and Theocritus’ second Idyll’, CPh 90(1), 115.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (ed.) (2008), The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite (Oxford).Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011a), ‘Introduction. Modern Scholarship on the Homeric Hymns: Foundational Issues’, in Faulkner (2011b), 128.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (ed.) (2011b), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589036.001.0001Google Scholar
Fearn, D.W. (ed.) (2010), Aegina. Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry: Myth, History and Identity in the Fifth Century BC (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546510.001.0001Google Scholar
Felson, N. (2011), ‘Children of Zeus in the Homeric Hymns: Generational Succession’, in Faulkner (2011b), 254–79.Google Scholar
Felson, N. and Parmentier, R.J. (2015), ‘The “Savvy Interpreter”: Performance and Interpretation in Pindar's Victory Odes’, Signs and Society 3(2), 261305.10.1086/683076Google Scholar
Fogelmark, S. (1972), Studies in Pindar, with particular reference to Paean vi and Nemean vii (Lund).Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1992), Homer: The Poetry of the Past (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
Förstel, K. (1979), Untersuchungen zum Homerischen Apollonhymnos (Bochum).Google Scholar
Fröhder, D. (1994), Die Dichterische Form der Homerischen Hymnen: untersucht am Typus der mittelgrossen Preislieder, Spudasmata 53 (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Gagné, R. (2015), ‘“How should I hymn you?” Literary evidence: Poetry’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion (Oxford), 8396.Google Scholar
García, J.F. (2002), ‘Symbolic action in the Homeric Hymns: the theme of recognition’, ClAnt 21, 539.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1988), Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, trans. Cole, A.T. (Baltimore/London) [orig. publ. 1984].Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002), Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2009), ‘Greek Lyric and Early Greek Literary History’, in Budelmann (2009), 95122.10.1017/CCOL9780521849449.006Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2001), ‘Epic With An End: An Interpretation of Homeric Hymns 15 and 20’, in Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P. (eds), Homer, Tragedy and Beyond. Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling (London), 2341.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (2013), ‘Coordinated sequences of analogous topics in the Delian and Pythian segments of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, TiC 5(1), 18.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (2015), ‘Imagination versus Necessity in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, Gaia 18, 145–56.10.3406/gaia.2015.1649Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1996), ‘Dancing in Athens, dancing on Delos: some patterns of choral projection in Euripides’, Philologus 140, 4862.10.1524/phil.1996.140.1.48Google Scholar
Herington, C.J. (1985), Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. (2004), ‘The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts’, in Mackie (2004), 7194.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.L., and Uhlig, A. (eds) (2017), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge).10.1017/9781316597798Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. (2010), ‘Deflected addresses: apostrophe and space (Sophocles, Aeschines, Plautus, Cicero, Virgil and others)’, CQ 60(1), 96109.10.1017/S0009838809990450Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1982), Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns. Diachronic Development in Epic Diction (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Jones, A., and Heathfield, A. (eds) (2012), Perform, Repeat, Record: Live Art in History (Bristol).Google Scholar
Kakridis, J. (1937), ‘Zum homerischen Apollonhymnos’, Philologus 92, 104–8.10.1524/phil.1937.92.14.104Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2007), Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219964.001.0001Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (2013), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2013), ‘Imagining chorality: wonder, Plato's puppets, and moving statues’, in Peponi, A.E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato's Laws (Cambridge), 123–70.10.1017/CBO9781139061674.008Google Scholar
Leclerc, M.C. (2002), ‘Cheminements vers la parole: notes sur l’Hymne Homérique à Apollon’, Pallas 59, 151–65.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S.H. (1993), Dance and Ritual Play in Greek Religion (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S.H. (1994–95), ‘Homeric Hymn to Apollo: Prototype and Paradigm of Choral Performance’, Arion 3, 2540.Google Scholar
Mackie, C.J. (ed.) (2004), Oral Performance and Its Context (Leiden).Google Scholar
Martin, R.P. (2000), ‘Synchronic aspects of Homeric performance: the evidence of the Hymn to Apollo’, in González de Tobia, A.M. (ed.), Una nueva vision de la cultura griega antigua hacia el fin del milenio (La Plata), 403–32.Google Scholar
Maslov, B. (2012), ‘The Real Life of the Genre of Prooimion’, ClPh 107(3), 191205.Google Scholar
Miller, A.M. (1986), From Delos to Delphi: a literary study of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar
Miller, A.M. (1993), ‘Pindaric Mimesis: The Associative Mode’, CJ 89(1), 2153.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds) (2015), Trends in Classics. Special Edition on Tragedy and Reperformance, TiC 7(2).Google Scholar
Morrison, A.D. (2007a), Performances and Audiences in Pindar's Sicilian Victory Odes, BICS Suppl. 95 (London).Google Scholar
Morrison, A.D. (2007b), The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511597343Google Scholar
Morrison, A.D. (2012), ‘Performance, re-performance and Pindar's audiences’, in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012), 111–33.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2009), ‘Perfecting the Hymn in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, in Athanassaki, Martin and Miller (2009), 1744.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2011), ‘The Earliest Phases in the Reception of the Homeric Hymns’, in Faulkner (2011b), 280333.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589036.003.0013Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2013), ‘The Delian Maidens and their relevance to choral mimesis in classical drama’, in Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. (eds), Choral mediations in Greek tragedy (Cambridge), 227–56.10.1017/CBO9781139519564.010Google Scholar
Nooter, S. (2012), When Heroes Sing: Sophocles and the Shifting Soundscape of Tragedy (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511736209Google Scholar
Olson, S.D. (ed.) (2012), The ‘Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite’ and Related Texts: Text, Translation and Commentary (Berlin).10.1515/9783110260748Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, Z.D. (2014), ‘Pythian or Delian? A Cycladic reading of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, in Bonnin, G. and le Quéré, E. (eds), Pouvoirs, îles et mer. Formes et modalities de l'hégémonie dans les Cyclades antiques (VIIe s. a.C.–IIIe s. P.C.) (Bordeaux), 243–56.Google Scholar
Peponi, A.E. (2009), ‘Choreia and aesthetics in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo: the performance of the Delian Maidens (lines 156–64)’, ClAnt 28, 3970.Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. (2013), ‘The Never-Ending Stories: A perspective on Greek Hymns’, in Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art (Heidelberg), 203–27.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. (ed.) (2010), Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511840296Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2001), Pindar's Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre (Oxford).Google Scholar
Schneider, R. (2011), Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment (London).10.4324/9780203852873Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1996), ‘Self-correction, spontaneity, and orality in archaic poetry’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece (Leiden), 5979.Google Scholar
Scully, S. (2009), ‘Apollo and the Dance of Olympus’, in Athanassaki, Martin and Miller (2009), 91107.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2014), ‘Inscribing performances in Pindar's Olympian 6’, TAPhA 144(1), 117.Google Scholar
Taddei, A. (2007), ‘Mneme e terpsis: Rammemorazione e rituale nell'Inno omerico ad Apollo’, in Marrucci, L. and Taddei, A. (eds), Polivalenze Epiche. Contributi di antropologia storica (Pisa), 7993.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (ed.) (2013), The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: introduction, text and commentary (Berlin).Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1999), ‘The invention of Homer’, CQ 49(2), 364–82.10.1093/cq/49.2.364Google Scholar
West, M.L. (ed.) (2003), Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Willmott, J. (2007), The Moods of Homeric Greek (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Winkler, J.J., and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds) (1992), Nothing to Do with Dionysus? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context (Princeton).Google Scholar