Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:33:04.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cattle and Honour in Homer and Hesiod

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Apostolos N. Athanassakis*
Affiliation:
University of California at Santa Barbara
Get access

Extract

The concept of Homeric or simply Greek honour is not as easy to comprehend as is commonly assumed. Basically it is a system of values stemming from the belief that no harm done to self, kinsman, friend or property should remain uncompensated or unavenged. In a way, what is subsumed under the term honour is an awareness that the higher one bids the higher one is. In the present article the English word ‘honour’ is only a code word for the various fundamentals of life that belong to the semantic compass of Homeric timē. The word ‘cattle’ is also a code word for livestock, especially bovine animals as well as sheep and goats. Honour is not much talked about these days, and many educated people are familiar with some of its aspects mostly through the works of cultural anthropologists who, it seems, have to go to the far corners of the earth to study it. Yet, both honour and the price for honour are ubiquitous in our modern world. The difference is that the state is the keeper of every citizen's honour and as such it regulates punishment for offence to collective or individual honour and, through its courts, decides the material price that must be paid in compensation for real or even intended harm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Adkins, A.W.H., Moral Values and Political Behaviour in Ancient Greece (New York 1972)Google Scholar, chapters 2 and 3, esp. pp.15–34; From the Many to the One (London 1970), 13–48Google ScholarPubMed; Merit and Responsibility (London 1960), 61–85Google ScholarPubMed. Of special interest is Adkin, ’s article ‘Honour and Punishment in the Homeric Poems’, BICS 7(1960), 23–32Google Scholar.

2. Jones, Hugh Lloyd, The Justice of Zeus (London 1971), 1–28Google Scholar; Donlan, Walter, The Aristocratic Ideal in Ancient Greece (Lawrence KS 1980), 1–34Google Scholar.

3. Culley, John H., Cattle, Horses, and Men (Tucson 1984), xivGoogle Scholar; cf. also 225, 230, 244–46.

4. Walcot, P. has written of shame and honour in Greek Peasants, Ancient and Modern (New York 1970), 56–76Google Scholar. It is remarkable, to me at least, that the ideals of levendia, pallikaria, and timē are left entirely out of consideration.

5. For geographical position, antiquities, history, and lore of Agrapha and Tzoumerka, see Hammond, N.G.L., Epirus (Oxford 1967), 9–37, 443–58, 153fGoogle Scholar. (Hammond spells Tsoumerka).

6. For the history and social structure of Mani see Mexis, Dimos N., I Mani kai i Maniates (Athens 1977)Google Scholar. Pages 17–19 refer specifically to questions raised in this study. On honour and blood feud in Mani see Alexakis, Eleuth. P., Ta Yeni kai i Ikoyenia stin Paradosiaki Kinonia tis Manis (Athens 1980), 100–15Google Scholar. The beautifully written Mani: Travels in the Southern Peloponnese (London 1958)Google Scholar by Patrick Leigh Fermor is a sine qua non for the educated reader with an interest in Mani.

7. For some details on this as well as the beginning of a rare folk song referring to athanato nero see my note on Theogony 775–806 in Hesiod, , Theogony, Works and Days, Shield, tr. Athanassakis, Apostolos N. (Baltimore and London 1983), 53Google Scholar. All translations of Hesiod in this article are from this work.

8. The first three lines of this rare folk song are given in my notes on Theogony 507–615 (Athanassakis [n.7 above], 49).

9. Campbell, J.K., Honour, Family and Patronage (Oxford 1964), 268Google Scholar.

10. Ibid. 298.

11. Ibid. 19.

12. Kuhn, Hans, Edda (Heidelberg 1962), 29Google Scholar; Hollander, Lee M. tr., The Poetic Edda (Austin 1962), 25Google Scholar. The word for cattle is , cognate of English fee, German vieh, etc. (see below, p. 179).

13. For a simple case of valuation based on heads of cattle in Homer, consider duōdekaboios, ‘worth twelve oxen’, in reference to a golden tripod (Il. 23.703), and tessaraboios, ‘worth four oxen’, in reference to a slave woman (Il. 23.705); cf. also Il. 6.236. For more details see Athanassakis, A., ‘An Inquiry into the Etymology and Meaning of iphthimos in the Early Epic’, Glotta 49 (1971), 1–21Google Scholar.

14. For an illustration of compensation in kúgildi see Foote, P.G. and Wilson, D.M., The Viking Achievement (London 1970), 423fGoogle Scholar. It should be noted that in Iceland payment was frequently made in sheep, especially rams.

15. Ibid. 428, 430,432 correspondingly.

16. Ibid. 425–27. For feud in which honour is at stake see Byock, Jesse, Feud in the Icelandic Saga (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1982), 73, 100, 134Google Scholar, and especially 182–89 on Gunnarr of Hlídarendi, the central hero of the famous Brennu-Njálls Saga. A most useful introduction to the literature that provides us with the Icelandic sources on social values and poetry is Einar Ól. Sveinsson, ’s Islenzkar Bókmeutir i Fornóld (Reykjavik 1962)Google Scholar. An accessible and eloquent account of the Icelandic tradition and the spirit of the land is to be found in Magnusson, Sigurdur A.’s Northern Sphinx (London 1976), 43–100 and 159–76Google Scholar.

17. The information presented here on Sphakia—and by extension on such parts of Crete as the great region dominated by Mt Psiloritis (ancient Mt Ida) I owe to the kind auspices of the Guggenheim Foundation and to such research as I was able to conduct in these areas especially during the academic year 1987–88, when I worked in Crete as a Guggenheim Fellow. Essentially, I owe it all to those Cretans who received me as a guest and chose to speak to me as such. Also, Dr. Robert Petty, my field assistant in several of my travels is hereby thanked for his labours. There are few books that touch on the subject of honour in Crete, let alone in Sphakia in particular. Herzfeld, Michael’s The Poetics of Manhood (Princeton 1985)Google Scholar offers much useful information on a great range of sociological aspects on the village of Zoniania, to which he refers by the fictitious name of Glendi. Regrettably, he writes little on honour (233f.). Perhaps Patrick Leigh Fermor in his rich volume Roumeli: Travels in Northern Greece (London 1966), 125–44Google Scholar, especially 132–34, still is the best introduction to the sort of spirit that produces honour and levendia.

18. Athanassakis (n.7 above), 60.

19. On the obscure epithets mentioned here and Hermes’ precocious feat of cattle theft see Athanassakis, , ‘From the Phallic Cairn to Shepherd God and Divine Herald’, Eranos 87 (1989), 33–49Google Scholar.

20. Donlan, Walter, ‘The Pre-State Community in Greece’, SO 64 (1989), 5–29, esp. 8 and 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Finley, M.I., Economy and Society in Ancient Greece (New York 1981), 1–23 and 243fGoogle Scholar.

21. On this famous fraternal feud see Van Groningen, B.A., Hésiode et Persès (Amsterdam 1957), 153–56 and esp. 164–66Google Scholar.

22. Bintcliff, J.L. and Snodgrass, A.M., ‘The Cambridge/Bradford Boeotian Expedition: The First Four Years’, JFA 12 (1985), 123–61Google Scholar; esp. 138 (where the phrase quoted occurs), 143 and 154.

23. Detienne, Marcel, ‘Crise agraire et attitude religieuse chez Hésiode’, Latomus 68 (1963), 15–27Google Scholar.

24. Nagy, Gregory states ‘the persona of Hesiod as reflected by his poetry is purely generic, not historical’: ‘Hesiod’, in Luce, T.J. (ed.), Ancient Greek Authors (New York 1983), 43–53 at 50Google Scholar. In his ‘Authorisation and Authorship in the Hesiodic Theogony’, published in the present volume, he derives Hesiod’s name from hiēmi, ‘emit’, and *odos, a cognate of audē, ‘voice’, thereby maintaining that the poet’s name belongs to meaningful poetic convention (see above, p. 120). Meier-Brügger, Michael, ‘Zu Hesiods Namen’, Glotta 68 (1990), 62–67Google Scholar, through different etymological details comes to the conclusion that Hesiod’s name is folk-etymological and calls it a ‘Berufs- und Kiinstlername’ (67). It seems, in the face of all this, that Hesiod’s pastoral encounter with the Muses may indeed be poetic fiction, another artifice necessary for the authority he needs in his poem.

25. On the view of this cooperative effort, which clearly involved children, see Detienne (n.23 above), 22–24.

26. On slave labour in Hesiod see Finley (n.20 above), 106.

27. Hammond, N.G.L., A History of Greece to 322 BC (Oxford 1959), 12Google Scholar.

28. Ralph M. Rosen has advanced the interesting view that Hesiod’s Nautilia, that portion of the Works and Days that refers to sailing, is to be understood in terms of an extended and elaborate poetic metaphor: Poetry and Sailing in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, ClAnt 9 (1990), 99–113Google Scholar.

29. See Fontenrose, Joseph, ‘Work, Justice, and Hesiod’s Five Ages’, CPh 69 (1974), 1–16, esp. 7 and 11fGoogle Scholar. on hubris in the myth of the five ages. Note that it may be oversimplifying the argument to state with Matthew W. Dickie that in W&D 224–47, ‘What is meant by dikē in this passage is chiefly determined by the sense of the term hubris, to which it is opposed’ (Diké as a Moral Term in Homer and Hesiod’, CPh 73 [1978], 91–101 at 99Google Scholar). A broader and more diachronic discussion of hubris in Hesiod is to be found in Knox, Bernard M.W., Essays: Ancient and Modern (Baltimore 1989), 7–22Google Scholar. For hubris in classical times see MacDowell, Douglas M., ‘Hybris in Athens’, G&R 23 (1976), 14ff.Google Scholar; Fisher, N.R.E., ‘Hybris and Dishonour: I’, G&R 23 (1976), 177–91Google Scholar, esp. 176f. These two articles should be read in conjunction.

30. For a very comprehensive account of matters relevant to kakotēs and aretē see Adkins, Moral Values (n.1 above), 22–47. On aretē and timē in Homer see id., ‘Homeric Values and Homeric Society’, JHS 91 (1971), 1–14, esp. 9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Truth, kosmos, and aretē in the Homeric Poems’, CQ 22 (1972), 5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the problem of morality in Homer see Gagarin, Michael, ‘Morality in Homer’, CPh 82 (1987), 285–306Google Scholar.

31. Andersen, Oevind, ‘Some Thoughts on the Shield of Achilleus’, SO 51 (1976), 5–18, at 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hommel, Hildebrecht, ‘Die Gerichtsszene auf dem Schild des Achilleus’, Palingenesia 11 (1977), 444–58Google Scholar; Becker, Andrew Sprague, ‘The Shield of Achilles’, AJP 111 (1990), 139–53Google Scholar.

32. For dikē see Gagarin, Michael, ‘Dikē in the Works and Days’, CPh 68 (1973), 811–94Google Scholar, and Dikē in Archaic Greek Thought’, CPh 69 (1974), 186–97Google Scholar. A perspective differing from Gagarin’s is to be found in Dickie (n.29 above), 96.

33. The view that Hesiod is primarily a poet who speaks in various personae and who selects and rearranges details from his own life to suit the demands of his Muse is not one for which I can claim any credit. A well-developed argument on this has been presented by Griffith, Mark, ‘Personality in Hesiod’, ClAnt 2 (1983), 37–65Google Scholar. An entirely opposite view had been presented by Walcot, P., Hesiod and the Near East (Cardiff 1966)Google Scholar; note especially his statement, ‘The Works and Days is an intensely personal poem. Acknowledge this and you will be compelled to admit the truth of what Hesiod has to say about himself, his brother, and his father’ (106).

34. For the identification of Askra see Fossey, John M., Topography and Population of Ancient Boiotia, vols. 1–2 (Chicago 1988), 143–45Google Scholar. For topographical details of Askra (identified with Pyrgaki) and of the Valley of the Muses see Wallace, Paul W., ‘Hesiod and the Valley of the Muses’, GRBS 15 (1974), 5–24Google Scholar.

35. Benveniste, Emile, Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, vol. 1 (Paris 1969), 37–61, esp. 37, 44, 47 and 61Google Scholar.

36. Palmer, L.R., ‘The Indo-European Origins of Greek Justice’, TPhS, 1950, 149–68Google Scholar, esp. 150 on kairos and 161f. on diké. See also Goodenough, Ward H., ‘The Evolution of Pastoralism and Indo-European Origins’, in Cardonna, Hoenigswald, and Senn, (eds.), Papers Presented at the Third Indo-European Conference at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia 1970), 253–65Google Scholar.

37. Lincoln, Bruce, Myth, Cosmos, and Society (Cambridge MA 1986), 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38. Lloyd-Jones, H., ‘Ehre und Schande in der Griechischen Kultur’, A&A 38 (1987), 1–28Google Scholar.

39. See Campbell (n.9 above).

40. T.S. Eliot, Burnt Norton 1–3.

41. I have also made use of the following works which have not been cited elsewhere in the footnotes: Arthur, M.W., ‘Cultural Strategies in Hesiod’s Theogony: Law, Family, Society’, Arethusa 15 (1982), 63–82Google Scholar; Barbu, N.I., ‘La hiérarchie des valeurs humaines chez Hesiode’, StudClas 10 (1968), 207–12Google Scholar; Byock, Jesse L., Medieval Iceland (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1990), 14–30 and 77–102Google Scholar; Diamond, A.S., Primitive Law Past and Present (London 1971)Google Scholar; Durham, Edith, High Albania (Boston 1987; first printing 1909), 19–113Google Scholar (many references to honour and feud); Edwards, Anthony T., ‘Kleos Aphthiton and Oral Theory’, CQ 38 (1988), 25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; id., Achilles in the Odyssey: Ideologies of Heroism in the Homeric Epic (Meisenheim 1985)Google Scholar; id., ‘Aristos Achaiōn: Heroic Death and Dramatic Structure in the Iliad’, QUCC 46 (1984), 61–80, esp. 75f.Google Scholar; Fontenrose, J., ‘Work, Justice, and Hesiod’s Five Ages’, CPh 69 (1974), 1–16Google Scholar; Gagarin, Michael, Early Greek Law (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1986), esp. 1–50Google Scholar; Gallant, Thomas W., Risk and Survival in Ancient Greece (Stanford 1991), 146 and 231f.Google Scholar; Gernet, Louis, The Anthropology of Greece, tr. Hamilton, John, S.J., , and Nagy, Blaise (Baltimore 1968)Google Scholar, ch. 7; id., Droit et société dans la Grèce ancienne (Paris 1985)Google Scholar; Grimm, Jacob, Deutsche Rechtsaltertümer, 2 vols. (Darmstadt 1974; repr. of 1899 ed.), 11 and 174–57Google Scholar; Heubeck, Alfred, ‘Homerica’, Gymnasium 3 (1949), 242–54Google Scholar (on honour, 252f.); Rudolf Hirzel, Agraphos Nomos, and Marg, Walter, Der Character in der Sprache der frühgriechischen Dichtung (New York 1979)Google Scholar; Hofinger, M., ‘Hesiodea: Le Contraste kakotés areté dans les vers 286–292 des Travaux’, RecPhl 3 (1972), 71–76Google Scholar; Groenbech, Vilhelm, Vor Folkeaet: Oldtiden I (Copenhagen 1955; original ed. 1909–12), 58f.Google Scholar; Kent, Roland G., ‘Cattle Tending and Agriculture in the A vesta’, JAOS 39 (1959), 329–33Google Scholar; King, Katherine Callen, Achilles: Paradigms of the War Hero from Homer to the Middle Ages (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1987), 28–49Google Scholar; Knipe, David M., ‘The Heroic Theft: Myths from Rgveda IV and the Ancient Near East’, HR 6 (1967), 328–60Google Scholar; Rudolf Köstler, Homerisches Recht, and Vos, Harm, Themis (New York 1979)Google Scholar; Kreissig, H., ‘Das Haus (oikos) des Hesiod’, JWG Teil 4 (1981), 91–95Google Scholar; Kyriazopoulos, S.D., ‘Dikaiosunē kai Alētheia eis ton Hesiodon’, Dodone 4 (1975) 9–45Google Scholar; Lehmann, Winfred P., ‘On Reflections of Germanic Legal Terminology and Situation in the Edda’, in Polomé, Edgar C. (ed.), Old Norse Literature and Mythology (Austin 1969), 227–43Google Scholar; Lincoln, Bruce, Priests, Warriors, and Cattle: A Study in the Ecology of Religions (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1981), 1–12 and 134–84Google Scholar; Martin, Richard P., The Language of Heroes (Ithaca and London 1989), esp. 88–145Google Scholar; Mavrakakis, Yannis, Pimenika tis ditikis Kritis (Chania 1948; repr. 1985)Google Scholar; Moulinier, Louis, Le pur et l’impur dans la pensée des Grecs (Paris 1952), 1–58Google Scholar and passim; Nagy, Gregory, The Best of the Achaeans (Baltimore 1979), 16–18, 41 and 111–15Google Scholar; id., Greek Mythology and Poetics (Ithaca and London 1990), esp. 36–82Google Scholar on ‘Hesiod and the Poetics of Pan-Hellenism’; Oesterud, S., ‘The Individuality of Hesiod’, Hermes 104 (1976), 13–29Google Scholar. Parker, Robert, Miasma, Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion (Oxford 1983), 128–37Google Scholar; Perysinakis, I., ‘Hesiod’s Treatment of Wealth’, Métis 1 (1986), 97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pötscher, Walter, ‘Moira, Themis und timé in homerischen Denken’, WS 78 (1960), 5–39Google Scholar; Pucci, P., Hesiod and the Language of Poetry (Baltimore 1977)Google Scholar; Redford, James M., Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector (Chicago 1975)Google Scholar; Riedinger, Jean-Claude, ‘Remarques sur la timē chez Homere’, REG 89 (1976), 244–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; von Roth, Rudolph, ‘Wergeld im Veda’, ZDMG 41(1881), 672–76Google Scholar; Saunier, Guy, ‘Adikia’: Le mat et l’injustice dans les chansons populaires grecques (Paris 1979), 1–74Google Scholar; Scarcella, A.M., ‘Morfologia Socio-Ecconomica della Società esiodea’, Philosophia e Società 29 (1986), 23–49Google Scholar; Schroeder, V., ‘Indogermanisches Wergeld’, Festgruss an Rudolf von Roth (Stuttgart 1893), 49–52Google Scholar; Sussman, L.S., ‘Workers and Drones: Labor, Idleness and Gender Definition in Hesiod’s Beehive’, Arethusa 11 (1978), 22–41Google Scholar; Sveinsson, Einar Ól, ‘The Edda and Homer’, Laographia 22 (1965), 531–52Google Scholar; Walcot, P., ‘Cattle Raiding, Heroic Tradition and Ritual: The Greek Evidence’, HR 18 (1979), 326–51Google Scholar; Welles, E.B., ‘Hesiod’s Attitude toward Labor’, GRBS 8 (1967), 5–23Google Scholar; Wikander, Stig, Der Arische Männerbund (Lund 1938), 22–94Google Scholar; Wolff, H.J., ‘The Origin of Juridical Litigation Among the Greeks’, Traditio 4 (1946), 31–87Google Scholar; Zaehner, R.C., Hinduism (Oxford 1962), esp. 102–24Google Scholar on dharma; Zimmer, Heinrich, Philosophies of India, ed. Campbell, Joseph (Princeton 1969), 40f.Google Scholar on dharma.