Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:07:41.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of a Participatory Decision Making Agent Architecture Based on Argumentation and Influence Function – Application to a Serious Game about Biodiversity Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2010

Alessandro Sordoni ,
Jean-Pierre Briot ,
Isabelle Alvarez ,
Eurico Vasconcelos ,
Marta de Azevedo Irving  and
Gustavo Melo
Alessandro Sordoni
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6), Université Pierre et Marie Curie – CNRS, Paris, France. [email protected]; [email protected]
Jean-Pierre Briot
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6), Université Pierre et Marie Curie – CNRS, Paris, France. [email protected]; [email protected] Computer Science Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. [email protected]
Isabelle Alvarez
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ingénierie pour les Systèmes Complexes (LISC), CEMAGREF, Aubière, France. [email protected]
Eurico Vasconcelos
Affiliation:
Computer Science Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. [email protected]
Marta de Azevedo Irving
Affiliation:
EICOS Program, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. [email protected]; [email protected]
Gustavo Melo
Affiliation:
EICOS Program, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper addresses an ongoing experience in the design of an artificial agenttaking decisionsand combining them with the decisions taken by human agents.The context is a serious game research project,aimed at computer-based support for participatory management of protected areas(and more specifically national parks)in order to promote biodiversity conservation and social inclusion.Its objective isto help various stakeholders (e.g., environmentalist, tourism operator)to collectively understand conflict dynamicsandexplore negotiationstrategies for the management of parks.In this paper,after introducing the design of our serious game, named SimParc,we will describe the architecture of the decision making agent playing the role of the park manager.In the game, the park manager makes final decisions based on its own analysisand also on the votes of the stakeholders.It includes two modules:1) individual decision –based on a model of argumentation,which also provides a basis to justify and explain the decision;2) participatory decision –to take into account the preferences/votes from the stakeholders.

Keywords

Artificial agentarchitecturedecisioncollectiveparticipatoryargumentationnegotiationserious gamemanagement of the environmentAgent artificielarchitecturedécision collectiveparticipatifargumentationnégotiationjeu sérieuxgestion de l'environnement.
Type
Research Article
Information
RAIRO - Operations Research , Volume 44 , Issue 4: COGIS'09 , October 2010 , pp. 269 - 283
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, ROADEF, SMAI, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D.F. Adamatti, J.S. Sichman and H. Coelho, Virtual players: From manual to semi-autonomous RPG, in Proc. of AIS-CMS'07 International Modeling and Simulation Multiconference (IMSM'07), Buenos Aires, Argentina, edited by F. Barros, C. Frydman, N. Giambiasi and B. Ziegler. The Society for Modeling Simulation International (SCS) (2007) pp. 159–164.
L. Amgoud and S. Kaci, On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation, in Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, 3366, Springer (2005) 192–207.
J.-P. Aubin, Viability theory, Modern Birkhäuser Classics (1992).
O. Barreteau, The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: Characterization of associations. J. Artif. Societies Social Simulation 6 (2003).
R.H. Bordini, M. Wooldridge and J.F. Hübner, Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason, Wiley Series in Agent Technology, John Wiley & Sons (2007).
Choquet, G., Theory of capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5 (1953) 131–295. CrossRef
Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77 (1995) 321–357. CrossRef
P. Guyot and S. Honiden, Agent-based participatory simulations: Merging multi-agent systems and role-playing games. J. Artif. Societies Social Simulation 9 (2006).
P. Moraitis, Un modèle de raisonnement pour agents autonomes fondé sur l'argumentation, in Journées Nationales de Modèles de Raisonnement (JNMR'03), Paris, France (2003).
I. Rahwan and L. Amgoud, An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning, in Proc. of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'06), Hakodate, Japan, ACM (2006) pp. 347–354.
A. Sordoni, Conception et implantation d'un agent artificiel dans le cadre du projet SimParc, Master's thesis, EDITE, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Paris, France (2008).
E. Vasconcelos, J.-P. Briot, M. Irving, S. Barbosa and V. Furtado, A user interface to support dialogue and negotiation in participatory simulations, edited by N. David and J.S. Sichman, in Multi-Agent-Based Simulation IX, LNAI, 5269, Springer (2009) 127–140.
E. Vasconcelos, G. Melo, J.-P. Briot, V.S. Patto, A. Sordoni, M. Irving, I. Alvarez and C. Lucena, A serious game for exploring and training in participatory management of national parks for biodiversity conservation: Design and experience, in Proc. of the VIIIth Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGAMES'09), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2009), pp.53–60.