Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:25:35.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The potential impact of a deep geologic repository for used nuclear fuel on non-human biota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

N. C. Garisto
Affiliation:
SENES Consultants Limited, 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12, Richmond Hill, L4B 3N4 Ontario, Canada
F. Cooper
Affiliation:
SENES Consultants Limited, 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12, Richmond Hill, L4B 3N4 Ontario, Canada
S. L. Fernandes
Affiliation:
SENES Consultants Limited, 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12, Richmond Hill, L4B 3N4 Ontario, Canada
Get access

Abstract

This study presents and implements a screening methodology for assessing the potential postclosure radiological impact of a deep geological repository (DGR) for used nuclear fuel on non-human biota. This screening methodology is designed for hypothetical sites representative of selected Canadian conditions under both present and potential future climate conditions. The screening is carried out by comparing estimated radionuclide concentrations to derived “No Effect Concentrations” (NECs). The NECs are screening or threshold criteria; the conservative nature of the assumptions used to derive the NECs ensures that as long as the NECs are not exceeded, there is confidence that, despite uncertainty in modelled environmental concentrations, there will be no significant ecological effect on non-human biota. In the event NECs are exceeded in screening calculations, a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment would be required to determine whether this is due to conservatism in the assumptions, lack of sufficient data or potential real impact. The NECs derived in this study were compared to other threshold criteria from U.S. and international literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Garisto, N.C., S.L. Fernandes, M. Monabbati, D. Brown, and F. Bajurny. 2005. Screening “No-Effect Concentrations” for Radionuclides in the Abiotic Environment from a Generic Ecological Risk Perspective: Derivation and Application to the Pickering Nuclear Site. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Radioactivity in the Environment, 2–6 October 2005 in Nice, France.
Garisto, F., J. Avis, N. Calder, A. D'Andrea, P. Gierszewski, C. Kitson, T.W. Melnyk, K. Wei and L. Wojciechowski. 2004. Third Case Study – Defective Container Scenario. Ontario Power Generation Report No. 06819-REP-01200-10126-R00. Toronto, Canada.
Garisto, F., J. Avis, N. Calder, P. Gierszewski, C. Kitson, T.W. Melnyk, K. Wei and L. Wojciechowski. 2005. Horizontal Borehole Concept Case Study. Ontario Power Generation Report No. 06819-REP-01200-10139-R00. Toronto, Canada.
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) 1994. The Disposal of Canada's Nuclear Fuel Waste: Postclosure Assessment of a Reference System. Report AECL-10717, COG-93-7.
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) 1996. The Disposal of Canada's Nuclear Fuel Waste: A Study of Post-closure Safety of In-room Emplacement of Used CANDU Fuel in Copper Containers in Permeable Plutonic Rock. Vol. 5: Radiological Assessment. Report AECL-11494-5, COG-95-552-5.
Nagra. 2002. Project Opalinus Clay. Safety Report. Technical Report 02-05. Demonstration of Disposal Feasibility for Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-Level Waste and Long-Lived Intermediate-Level Waste (Entsorgungsnachweis). National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste. December.
ANDRA. 2005. Dossier 2005 Argile – Tome. Évaluation de sûreté.
SKB. 1999. SKB TR-99-23. SR 97 – Radionuclide Transport Calculations.
SKB. 2006. SKB TR-06-09. Long-Term Safety for KBS-3 Repositories at Forsmark and Laxemar – a First Evaluation. Main Report of the SR-Can Project. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. October.
Garisto, N.C., S.L. Fernandes and F. Cooper 2008. No-Effect Concentrations for Screening Assessment of Radiological Impacts on Non-Human Biota. Prepared for NWMO. SENES Report 34622. In preparation.
United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). 2000. DOE Standard. A Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota. Proj ENVR-0011. October.
Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA) 2007. ERICA Assessment Tool v1.0. August.