Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:48:31.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HTO transport and OBT formation after nighttime wet deposition of atmospheric HTO onto land surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

M. Ota
Affiliation:
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
H. Nagai
Affiliation:
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
Get access

Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate OBT production after a nighttime wet deposition of atmospheric HTO onto land surface, numerical experiments using a sophisticated tritium transport model (SOLVEG-II) were conducted. For a nighttime rain actually observed at a grassland site, two hypothetical scenarios for wet deposition of HTO were made; 0.1-folded and 10-folded case, each having rain HTO concentration at 0.1 folds and 10 folds of equilibrium concentration of ground-level air HTO concentration. Calculation results showed atmospheric HTO concentration after the rain at 10-folded case was more than an order of magnitude larger than that at 0.1-folded case, affected by interception and evaporation of rain HTO with leaves, and, by a larger HTO re-emission from soil. After the rain, due to these heightened atmospheric HTO, TFWT concentration in leaf cellular water at 10-folded case kept an order, or more, larger than that at 0.1-folded case. As a result, OBT produced in leaves over nine-day after the rain at 10-folded case was 18 times larger than that at 0.1-folded case. We therefore concluded that nighttime wet deposition of HTO pronouncedly increases OBT formation if rain HTO concentration exceeds equilibrium concentration for the air HTO near the ground.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

W. Gulden and W. Raskob, Fusion Eng. Des. 75–79 (2005) 1211-1216.
W. Raskob and P.J. Barry, J. Environ. Radioact. 36 (1997) 237-251.
C. Boyer, L. Vichot, M. Fromm, Y. Losset, F. Tatin-Froux, P. Guétat and P.M. Badot, Environ. Exp. Bot. 67 (2009) 34-51.
J. Feinhals and C. Bunnenberg, Fusion Technol. 14 (1988) 1253-1257.
M. Täschner, C. Bunnenberg and W. Raskob, J. Environ. Radioact. 36 (1997) 219-235.
Y. Belot, “Deviation of parameters for use in tritium washout predictions”, Workshop of IEA Task Group on Tritium Safety and Environmental Effects, AECL, Canada, May 11-12. (1998)
A. Golubev, M. Khabibulin and S. Mavrin, Radioprotection-Colloques. 37C1 (2002) 465-470.
H. Yamazawa, Environ. Model. Softw. 16 (2001) 739-751.
H. Nagai, J. Appl. Meteorol. 44 (2005) 1574-1592.
M. Ota and H. Nagai, J. Environ. Radioact. (2011) (in press).