Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:41:18.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decision support systems and emergency response exercises – lessons and issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

J. Barescut ,
D. S. Slavnicu ,
D. V. Vamanu ,
D. Gheorghiu ,
V. T. Acasandrei  and
B. I. Vamanu
D. S. Slavnicu
Affiliation:
“Horia Hulubei”, National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-6, Magurele, Atomistilor Street 407, Romania
D. V. Vamanu
Affiliation:
“Horia Hulubei”, National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-6, Magurele, Atomistilor Street 407, Romania
D. Gheorghiu
Affiliation:
“Horia Hulubei”, National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-6, Magurele, Atomistilor Street 407, Romania
V. T. Acasandrei
Affiliation:
“Horia Hulubei”, National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-6, Magurele, Atomistilor Street 407, Romania
B. I. Vamanu
Affiliation:
“Horia Hulubei”, National Institute of R&D for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-6, Magurele, Atomistilor Street 407, Romania
Get access

Abstract

The paper reports on the experience and specific findings of a research team involved in emergency preparedness and response management activities using the decision support systems (DSS) RODOS and MOIRA in conjuction with domestic radiological assessment tools. Two cases are discussed – the ConvEX 3, 2005, international alert exercise targeting a CANDU reactor at Cernavoda nuclear power plant in Romania, and Oltenia 07 – a nation-wide drill around a scenario involving transborder effects from a VVER reactor at Kozloduy, Bulgaria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 44 , Issue 5: ECORAD 2008 - Radioecology and Environmental Radioactivity , 2009 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rafat, M., Raskob, W. and Schichtel, T., 2006. Concept of outline of the redesign of RODOS. EURANOS, CAT2-TN06-01, Jan 2006.
Raskob, W. and Ehrhardt, J., 2000. The RODOS System: Decision Support for Nuclear Off-site Emergency Management in Europe. 10th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (CD published May 14–19, 2000. Hiroshima Japan).
McKenna, T.J., Trefethen, J.A. and Zhiguang, Li, 1995. International RTM-95 Response Technical Manual. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission IRD/AEOD, Washington, D.C. Version May, 1995.
Vamanu, D. V. and McKenna, T.J., 1996. ROBOT – Rule-Oriented Basic Operational Tool. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data. Washington, D.C., March, 2006.
Magan, M. and Gallego, E., 2006. Application of the MOIRA DSS to evaluate rehabilitation strategies for contaminated freshwater bodies at the local and regional levels. EURANOS(DEM) – TN(06).
Slavnicu, D., Vamanu, D., Gheorghiu, D., Acasandrei, V. and Vamanu, B., 2005. ConvEX-3 2005, International Emergency Management Exercise – NIPNE Decision Support. A Technical Report to the Organizers.