Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:35:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Verification of Radiocarbon Transport Predicted by Numerical Modeling in the Porous Formation of NE Hungary Considering Paleo-Hydrogeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2019

Ferenc Székely
Affiliation:
University of Miskolc, Faculty of Earth Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Management, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary
József Deák
Affiliation:
GWIS Ltd., Hóvirág Street 9, Veszprém, 8200Hungary
Péter Szűcs
Affiliation:
University of Miskolc, Faculty of Earth Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Management, MTA-ME Geoengineering Research Group, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary
László Kompár
Affiliation:
University of Miskolc, Faculty of Earth Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Management, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary
Balázs Zákányi*
Affiliation:
University of Miskolc, Faculty of Earth Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Management, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary
Mihály Molnár
Affiliation:
Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre, Bem square 18/c, Debrecen, 4026Hungary
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Verification of a groundwater flow model by radiocarbon (14C) data are presented taking into consideration the paleo-hydrogeological changes. Northeastern area of the Great Hungarian Plain was a deep-lying flat area, and its central part (Nyírség) has been uplifted in the last 15,000 years. These geological events have drastically changed the hydrogeological conditions of Nyírség. The groundwater flow system is composed of the Quaternary-Pliocene-Upper Pannonian clastic sediments. Groundwater flow modeling has been performed to define the main lateral and vertical flow directions and velocities controlling the propagation of the environmental radioactive tracer 14C. Solute-transport modeling was used to calculate the 14C activity. The recent steady-state groundwater flow velocity was reduced to a reasonable value characterizing the average flow velocity over the 15 ka simulation period using “trial and error” method. The best fit between the simulated and measured 14C data was achieved by assuming 0.4 flow velocity reduction factor. Results indicate that the present steady-state flow model with this flow velocity reduction factor is capable of reproducing the observed 14C data taking into account the effect of the significant uplift of the part of the land surface in the last 15 ka in NE Hungary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article has been corrected since its original publication. See doi:10.1017/RDC.2019.128.

References

REFERENCES

AQUAVEO LLC. 2013. Groundwater modeling system GMS 10.0 software.Google Scholar
Clark I, Fritz P. 1999. Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.Google Scholar
Cook, PG, and Herczeg, AL. 2000. Environmental tracers in subsurface hydrology. Australia: CSIRO Land and Water.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deák, J. 1979. Environmental isotopes and water chemical studies for groundwater research in Hungary. Isotope Hydrology 1978. Vienna: IAEA. p. 221249.Google Scholar
Deák, J, Stute, M, Rudolph, J, Sonntag, C. 1987. Determination of the flow regime of Quaternary and Pliocene layers in the Great Hungarian Plain (Hungary), by D, 18O, 14C and noble gas measurements. Isotope Techniques in Water Resources Development. Vienna: IAEA. p. 335350.Google Scholar
Deák, J. 1995. Study of groundwater recharge using isotope methods on the Great Hungarian Plain. VITUKI Final Report. Budapest. p. 128. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Deák, J, Deseő, É, Davidesz, K. 1996. Verification of MODFLOW modeling in SE Hungary using environmental isotope and ground water quality data. Hydroinformatics. Zürich: Balkema. p. 607612.Google Scholar
Dénes Gy, Deák J. 1981. Environmental isotope studies of groundwater. VITUKI Final Report. Budapest. 400 p. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Diersch, HJG. 2005. WASY software FEFLOW. Reference manual. Berlin:WASY GmBH. p. 1292.Google Scholar
Demeter, G, Püspöki, Z, Lazányi, J, Buday, T. 2010. Sequence stratigraphic analysis in the Nyíregyháza-Szatmárnémeti area. Debrecen: Dominium Publisher. p. 1289. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Erdélyi, M. 1976. Outlines of the hydrodynamics and hydrochemistry of the Pannonian Basin. Acta Geologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, Tomus 20(3–4):287309 Google Scholar
Fritz, P, Fontes, JCh. 1980. Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Vol. 1. Amsterdam-Oxford-New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 1996. Manual on mathematical models in isotope hydrogeology. IAEA-TECDOC-910. p. 1206.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Water resources programme: sampling procedures for isotope hydrology. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2000. Environmental isotopes in the hydrological cycle, principles and applications. Vienna: IAEA. p. 1280.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2013. Isotope methods for dating old groundwater. Chapter 10, Numerical flow models and their calibration using tracer-based ages. Vienna: IAEA. p. 245258.Google Scholar
Marton L, Erdélyszky Zs, Rajner V. 1980. Environmental isotope studies in groundwater of Debrecen and Nyírség area. Hidrológiai Közlöny 60. évf. 2. sz: 8594. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Marton, L. 1981. Use of environmental isotopes in study of deep groundwater in Nyírség area [dissertation]. Budapest: Budapest University of Technology. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Mezősi, G. 2011. Az Alföld természeti képének kialakulása (Evolution of the natural landscape of the Great Hungarian Plane). In: Rakonczai, J, editor. Környezeti változások és az Alföld 7. kötet. Békéscsaba: Nagyalföld Alapítvány Kötetei p. 1524. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Pearson, FJ. 1965. Use of 13C/12C ratios to correct radiocarbon ages of materials initially diluted by limestone. Proc. 6th International Conference of Radiocarbon and Tritium Dating, Pullman, WA, USA.Google Scholar
Salmon, SU, Prommer, H, Park, J, Meredith, JV, Turner, KT, McCallum, JL. 2015. A general reactive transport modelling framework for simulating and interpreting groundwater 14C age and δ13C. Water Resources Research 51(1):359376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, WE. 2011. Calibration of models using groundwater age. Hydrogeology Journal 19(1): 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, WE, Révész, K, Deák, J. 2001. Inverse modeling using 14C ages: application to groundwater in the Danube-Tisza interfluvial region of Hungary. In: Seiler, KP, Wohnlich, S, editors. New approaches characterizing groundwater flow. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Congress of IAH, Munnich, 10–14 September. p. 401404.Google Scholar
Siade, A, Prommer, H, Suckow, A, Raiber, M. 2018. Using numerical groundwater modelling to constrain flow rates and flow paths in the surat basin through environmental tracer data. Final Report. Australia: CSIRO. p. 140.Google Scholar
Stute, M, Deák, J. 1989. Environmental isotope study (14C, 13C, 18O, D, noble gases) on deep groundwater circulation systems in Hungary with reference to paleoclimate. Radiocarbon 31(3): 902918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckow, A. 2014. The age of groundwater—definitions, models and why we do not need this term. Applied Geochemistry 50:222230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Székely, F. 1990. Coupled flow and advective transport simulation in multi-layer leaky aquifer systems. Groundwater Monitoring and Management. Proceedings of the Dresden Symposium (March 1987). IAHS Publication 173:305314.Google Scholar
Székely, F. 2006. Hydrogeologic modeling study in the porous aquifer system of NE Hungary. Hidrológiai Közlöny (86. évf.), 4 sz: 2328. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Székely, F, Deák, J, Szűcs, P, Zákányi, B. 2015. Using environmental isotopes in calibration of hydrodynamic models. Research report. University of Miskolc. p. 133. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Székely, F, Deák, J, Szűcs, P, Kovács, B, Kompár, L, Zákányi, B, Molnár, M. 2017. Numerical simulation of the radiocarbon concentration in the Lower Pleistocene aquifer at the NE part of the Great Hungarian Plain. 2nd International Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference Programme 3–7 July, 2017, Debrecen, Hungary.Google Scholar
Szucs, P, Civan, F, Virag, M. 2006. Applicability of the most frequent value method in groundwater modeling. Hydrogeology Journal 14(1–2):3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szűcs, P, Kompár, L, Palcsu, L, Deák, J. 2015: Estimation of groundwater replenishment change at a Hungarian recharge area. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 10(4): 227246.Google Scholar
Van Genuchten MTh. 1981. Analytical solutions for chemical transport with simultaneous adsorption, zero-order production and first-order decay. Journal of Hydrology 49(3–4):213233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virág, M. 2013. Complex hydrogeological study of the groundwater bearing aquifers in the upper Tisza region [dissertation]. Miskolc: University of Miskolc. In Hungarian.Google Scholar