Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:41:11.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Radiocarbon Age Determinations from the Crystal River Archaeological Site, Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Alexander Cherkinsky ,
Thomas J Pluckhahn  and
Victor D Thompson
Alexander Cherkinsky*
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, 120 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Thomas J Pluckhahn
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, SOC 107, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Victor D Thompson
Affiliation:
Center for Archaeological Science, University of Georgia, Baldwin Hall, Room 265B, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeologists interested in radiocarbon dating shell midden sites express concern regarding the accuracy of shell dates and how such determinations should be interpreted. This article discusses the problem of dating shells from sites in the southeastern United States. New results are presented comparing shell, bone, and soil-charcoal age determinations from the Crystal River site, located along the west-central Gulf Coast of Florida. Crystal River is a large multimound site whose occupants engaged in long-distance exchange throughout eastern North America during the Woodland period (∼1000 BC to AD 1050). In the summer of 2012, test units were excavated in several contexts at the site, including both mounds and occupation areas. Samples were collected for 14C dating, which were then processed at the University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies. This article focuses on samples from the stratified shell midden, from which it was hoped to construct a local correction for marine shell that could be used to date other contexts. The soil-charcoal and bone collagen from these samples have very similar ages (bone samples ranging from about 100 cal BC to cal AD 530 and soil-charcoal from cal AD 345 to 560); however, the shell samples collected from the same stratigraphic units are significantly older than the terrestrial dates (ranging from 1300 to 390 cal BC). The difference in calibrated ages between organic materials and the shells ranges between 560 to 1140 yr. This phenomenon cannot be explained solely by the marine reservoir effect. It appears that all the shell samples formed in mixed marine (∼50–60%) contexts, as indicated by the stable isotope ratios and the amount of atmospheric carbon remaining in the samples. The age of the shell samples cannot be used to date archaeological events as they are influenced not only by the marine reservoir effect, but also the local hardwater effect, which makes them significantly older.

Type
Reservoir Effects
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , 2014 , pp. 801 - 810
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bezerra, FHR, Vita-Finzi, C, Filho, FPL. 2000. The use of marine shells for radiocarbon dating of marine deposits. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 30(1):211–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, RP. 1951. The enigmatic Crystal River Site. American Antiquity 17:142–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, RP. 1953. The famous Crystal River Site. The Florida Anthropologist 6:9–37.Google Scholar
Bullen, RP. 1966. Stelae at the Crystal River Site, Florida. American Antiquity 31(6):861–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherkinsky, A, Culp, RA, Dvoracek, DK, Noakes, JE. 2010. Status of the AMS facility at the University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 268(7–8):867–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, CW. 1945. Geology of Florida. Geological Bulletin No. 29. Tallahassee: Florida Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Deo, JN, Stone, JO, Stein, JK. 2004. Building confidence in shell: variations in the marine radiocarbon reservoir correction for the Northwest Coast over the past 3,000 years. American Antiquity 69(4):771–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douka, K, Higham, TFG, Hedges, REM. 2010. Radiocarbon dating of shell carbonates: old problems and new solutions. Munibe Suplemento 31:18–27.Google Scholar
Dye, T. 1994. Apparent ages of marine shells: implications for archaeological dating in Hawai'i. Radiocarbon 36(1):51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Guthrie, DA, Morris, DP, Teveskov, MA, West, GJ, Walker, PL. 1996. An archaeological and paleontological chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38(2):355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, SL, Polyak, L. 1997. Radiocarbon content of pre-bomb marine mollusks and variations in the 14C reservoir for coastal areas of the Barents and Kara seas, Russia. Geophysical Research Letters 24(8): 885–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gischler, E, Gibson, MA, Oschmann, W. 2008. Giant Holocene freshwater microbialites, Laguna Bacalar, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Sedimentology 55(5):1293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenman, EF. 1938. Hopewellian traits in Florida. American Antiquity 3:327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzmarzyk, C. 1998. Evidence of stress in a precolumbian population from Mound G at the Crystal River Site, Florida [unpublished Master's thesis]. Gainesville: Department of Anthropology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Erlandson, JM, Walker, P. 1997. Evidence for temporal fluctuations in marine radiocarbon reservoir ages in the Santa Barbara Channel, Southern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:1051–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Southon, JR, Wise, K. 2002. Differences in 14C age between stratigraphically associated charcoal and marine shell from the Archaic period site of Kilometer 4, southern Peru: old wood or old water? Radiocarbon 44(1):53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, CB. 1903. Certain aboriginal mounds of the central Florida west-coast. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 12:361–438.Google Scholar
Moore, CB. 1907. Crystal River revisited. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Second Series 13(3):406–25.Google Scholar
Moore, CB. 1918. The northwestern Florida coast revisited. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Second Series 16(4):514–81.Google Scholar
Pliny, PE, Grantham, CT, Schuster, JN, Stankey, DL. 1988. Soil Survey of Citrus County, Florida. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Pluckhahn, TJ, Thompson, VD, Weisman, BR. 2010. Toward a new view of history and process at Crystal River (8CI1). Southeastern Archaeology 29(1):164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, HG. 1951. Crystal River revisited, revisited, revisited. American Antiquity 17:143–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF. 1993. Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):137–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW, Braziunas, T. 1986. Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal BP. Radiocarbon 28(2B):980–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Braziunas, TF. 1998. High-precision calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, DH. 2008. Radiocarbon dating on St. Catherines Island. In: Thomas, DH, editor. Native American Landscapes of St. Catherines Island, Georgia, Volume II. The Data. Anthropological Papers Number 88, Part II. New York: American Museum Of Natural History. p 345–71.Google Scholar
Thomas, DH, Sanger, MC, Hayes, RH. 2013. Revising the 14C reservoir correction for St. Catherines Island. In: Thompson, VD, Thomas, DH, editors. Life among the Tides: Recent Archaeology of the Georgia Bight. Anthropological Papers Number 98. New York: American Museum of Natural History. p 25–46.Google Scholar
Weisman, BR. 1995. Crystal River: A Ceremonial Mound Center on the Florida Gulf Coast. Florida Archaeology Series No 8. Tallahassee: Division of Historical Resources, Florida Department of State.Google Scholar
Willey, GR. 1948a. The cultural context of the Crystal River Negative-Painted style. American Antiquity 13:325–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, GR. 1948b. A prototype for the Southern Cult. American Antiquity 13:328–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, GR. 1949. Crystal River, Florida: a 1949 visit. The Florida Anthropologist 2:41–6.Google Scholar